• Home
  • About Us
  • Contact
  • Advertise
  • Awards
  • Privacy Policy
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • RSS
TheDomains.com

How Radix new TLDs fare with End-Consumers ?

August 9, 2016 by Raymond Hackney

Radix  produced an infographic based on an ICANN survey to analyze how their new strings are doing with consumers.

Some of the ICANN results:

  •  52% of surveyed consumers were aware of at least 1 new gTLD presented to them
  •  7 out of 10 of new-gTLD-aware consumers had visited a site on a new gTLD
  • Volume vs. Consumer mindshare: TLDs that top the charts in terms of domain volumes don’t necessarily own equal amount of consumer mind share
  • Time in Market does not impact Consumer Awareness: The amount of time that a TLD has been live for is not proportional to the customer awareness for the extension

Radix delved deeper into how .online and .website fared with consumers.

Radix

 

Filed Under: Infographics, New gTLD's, Radix

« Lazy Panelist Denies UDRP But Fails To Find RDNH On Inpact.me
Cock.com closes at $93,000 »

Comments

  1. andrew says

    August 9, 2016 at 1:13 pm

    this was an icann survey, not a radix survey

    • Raymond Hackney says

      August 9, 2016 at 1:23 pm

      Corrected thanks Andrew, ICANN got removed when changing drafts.

  2. John says

    August 9, 2016 at 2:51 pm

    .online – too long, too *banal*, too expensive

    .website – totally “blows”

    .site – too expensive, too banal, would be okay but certainly not great if cheaper to renew

    Conclusion:

    .Web as a new arrival eclipses and blows them all away, the ones above, that is. .Com still rules. .Net still good. A small number of the best of the best new ones are also great and much better than the ones above.

  3. Rubens Kuhl says

    August 9, 2016 at 3:50 pm

    This ICANN research is completely flawed. What we realized with the local results for our country is that people answered about the word after the dot, not the “dot something”. So asked about “.news”, the answer was about “news”… I can’t blame a registry for using such a result in their benefit, but I hope people don’t get too excited about these numbers and when they doesn’t measure reality correctly.

    • John McCormac says

      August 9, 2016 at 4:40 pm

      The ICANN stuff doesn’t even seem to have enough of a sample size or random selection process to even be considered research. It is pure marketing fluff. It may give the ICANN people a warm fuzzy feeling but it is utterly useless to registrars, hosters, registrants, domainers and end-users. I don’t think that ICANN really ever understood what it should have been measuring or how to measure it.

      Europe is a very big market and has at least 27 or so ccTLDs including the two largest ccTLDs in the world (.DE and .UK) and even the .EU ccTLD with about 3.8 million registrations. The new gTLDs are not market leaders and most people in Europe would be unaware of the new gTLDs.

  4. DomainManage.com says

    August 9, 2016 at 4:48 pm

    There must be some long term adopters for the new GTLD’s. I didn’t like them at first, but my friends new business launched on a .guru – it really suits this funky extension – I realize not everyone feels the same way!


Recent Articles

  • Dynadot increasing auction deposits
  • Rick Schwartz AiReviews.com deal sets off a flurry of AiReview related domain registrations
  • Sedo weekly domain name sales led by Diffs.com

Recent Comments

  • Raymond Hackney on Rick Schwartz weighs in on the second Coinbook.com auction
  • James K. on Rick Schwartz weighs in on the second Coinbook.com auction
  • Jose on Rick Schwartz weighs in on the second Coinbook.com auction
  • Rick Schwartz on James Booth is a bit miffed by those shitting on the .ai extension
  • brad on James Booth is a bit miffed by those shitting on the .ai extension

Categories

Archives

Copyright ©2025 TheDomains.com