• Home
  • About Us
  • Contact
  • Advertise
  • Awards
  • Privacy Policy
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • RSS
TheDomains.com

Google Loses UDRP On Play-Gogles.com; Not Confusing To TM On Google Play

May 22, 2013 by Michael Berkens

In a case that is sure to drive the trademark holders crazy, Google Inc. just lost a UDRP on the domain name play-gogles.com which was registered in February 2013.

 Google claimed it had rights to the domain name play-gogles.com based off its trademarks for Google and Google Play.

However the one member panel denied Google’s claim even though the domain holder didn’t even bother responding the the UDRP, finding 

“Panel is not persuaded by Complainant’s submissions that the terms are confusingly similar.”

However the panel also found “given the February 2013 registration date of the domain name and the content of the resolving website, more than suggest that Respondent targeted Complainant’s trademark”

“Complainant argues, in short, (i) that the word “play” is descriptive in the context of the goods; (ii) that GOGLE is an obvious misspelling of GOOGLE, and (iii) that merely inverting the terms of a trademark is insufficient to avoid confusing similarity.”

  “What that submission awkwardly sidesteps is the fact that, in English, the word “goggles” (always used in the plural) is a well understood common noun and that GOGLES is (1) a degree of misspelling closer to “goggles” than it is to GOOGLE; (2) is phonetically identical to “goggles”, and (3) when prefaced by the word “play” is given semantic sense and meaning which is altogether absent if GOGLES is interpreted as GOOGLE. “

“For the sake of completeness Panel notes here the evidence relative to the other elements of the Policy (legitimate interests and bad faith) which, given the February 2013 registration date of the domain name and the content of the resolving website, more than suggest that Respondent targeted Complainant’s trademark.  Nevertheless, it has been remarked more than once in former UDRP decisions that a complainant bears an essential obligation to prove confusing similarity under paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy independently of other factors.” 

 “Panel finds that Complainant has failed to satisfy the requirements of paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy.”

Filed Under: UDRP

About Michael Berkens

Michael Berkens, Esq. is the founder and Editor-in-Chief of TheDomains.com. Michael is also the co-founder of Worldwide Media Inc. which sold around 70K domain to Godaddy.com in December 2015 and now owns around 8K domain names . Michael was also one of the 5 Judges selected for the the Verisign 30th Anniversary .Com contest.

« ICANN Approves The Arab Center for Dispute Resolution (ACDR) As A UDRP Provider
Reserve Price Ranges For TRAFFIC Domain Name Auction Released »

Comments

  1. jose says

    May 22, 2013 at 12:14 pm

    great decision! and from a one member panel without any reply from the respondent…

  2. LM says

    May 22, 2013 at 7:51 pm

    I wonder if theyll pay the $11 and take googleplay.tv when it drops in 8 hours or wait a while and pay 200x more to get it at udrp 😀


Recent Articles

  • Sedo now offering 6 more payment options
  • NameJet/SnapNames May 2022 domain sales led by Vip.org
  • Sedo weekly domain sales led by Yachts.com

Recent Comments

  • FX on Move over Web3 hype here comes Web5
  • steven on JoeRogan.net expires closes at $52,000 at GoDaddy auctions
  • Mark Thorpe on JoeRogan.net expires closes at $52,000 at GoDaddy auctions
  • brian on JoeRogan.net expires closes at $52,000 at GoDaddy auctions
  • Cheetah Cowboy on Sedo weekly domain name sales led by Marathon.de

Polls

How Many .Web Domains Will Be Registered 1 Year After Launch

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Categories

Archives

domain name news

Copyright ©2019 TheDomains.com — Published by Worldwide Media, Inc. — Site by Nuts and Bolts Media