• Home
  • About Us
  • Contact
  • Advertise
  • Awards
  • Privacy Policy
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • RSS
TheDomains.com

What Percentage of .XXX Domains Are Defensive; Two Stories Out Today: One says 48% The Other 83%

December 22, 2011 by Michael Berkens

So what portion of .XXX domain name registrations were defensive that is purchased or registered to either block the domain name or for other reasons that to use the domain actively in the adult space.

Two stories are out on the topic today.

According to one report,  the registrar 123-reg.co.uk says that  “48% of registrations weren’t from those in the porn industry at all, but regular businesses hoping to protecting their brand and reputation.”

The story does not say how the registrar came up with that percentage.

According to a separate story today, NameNewsletter.com, says they ran a report based on the .XXX Zone File and concluded that “83% of the total registrations are defensive (inactive). The runners-up are default registrar name servers like Godaddy or Enom. These account for roughly 6%. ”

“The .xxx TLD can be said to be much more defensive than speculative.”

“Two specific name servers immediately stand out with 83451 domain names assigned to them: nsb2.icmregistry.net and nsb1.icmregistry.net.”

“These are the name servers for reserved (protected) domain names (example: Disney.xxx).”

“Domain names using these name servers resolve to a standard placeholder page provided by the registry.”

“These two name servers alone account for a staggering 83% of the whole zone file.”

I know for a fact that some .XXX domains that have been purchased still have ICM servers on them for example Orgy.XXX which we purchased with partners at TRAFFIC still have ICM servers and would be included by this report as “defensive registrations”.

Also I’m not sure how the Sunrise domains that are subject to auctions that start in January are treated in the Zone file either.

ICM has not supplied any stats on defensive registrations

We do know that there were around 80,000 sunrise applications which included applications for Trademarked domains and trademark blocks but also including matching existing domain names in other extensions and we don’t know the break down of those.

Of course other companies including a many colleges registered defensive .XXX registrations after Sunrise as well.

 

Filed Under: .XXX

About Michael Berkens

Michael Berkens, Esq. is the founder and Editor-in-Chief of TheDomains.com. Michael is also the co-founder of Worldwide Media Inc. which sold around 70K domain to Godaddy.com in December 2015 and now owns around 8K domain names . Michael was also one of the 5 Judges selected for the the Verisign 30th Anniversary .Com contest.

« ICANN Publishes It’s Annual Report & Reports $100 Million In Assets
UDRP Panelist & Lawyer Neil Brown Starts His Own Blog At DomainTimes.Info »

Comments

  1. °°°°° FaceAnswers.com °°°°° says

    December 22, 2011 at 12:23 pm

    95%

  2. Michael H. Berkens says

    December 22, 2011 at 12:35 pm

    I’m actually not looking for guesses just reporting on some stories on some numbers I read on the topic.

  3. Gazzip says

    December 22, 2011 at 12:41 pm

    Any inside story on Vatican x x x ?

    Disney shows pretty much the same 2021 expiry date ans the same email contact but it looks like some people think someone has already bought it.

    There’s an article in reuters and businessinsider today

    “Despite a spokesperson from the Vatican denying that it had purchased the domain, Reuters says that it is unclear whether the Holy See even attempted to acquire the web address. It is still a mystery as to who has bought the address.”

    businessinsider.com/someones-just-bought-the-vaticanxxx-web-address-and-its-not-the-pope-2011-12

    Whois shows

    Expiration Date:01-Dec-2021 20:40:13 UTC

    registryescrow(at)icmregistry.com

  4. Robert says

    December 22, 2011 at 12:49 pm

    Thank you very much for writing this article. It seems a bit strange that the registry (ICM) wouldn’t provide some stats themselves. It also strikes me as odd, that the registry will not publish their list of reserved names.

  5. Doc says

    December 22, 2011 at 12:51 pm

    The real number is over 99%…and the story is in the process of being broken by a major news outlet…facts are being collected…that’s all for now.

  6. Tony says

    December 22, 2011 at 12:57 pm

    MHB, do you plan on eventually becoming a .xxx reseller with buyxxx.com?

    Seems you’ve spent an inordinate amount of time covering this extension similar to your coverage of Demand’s stock price.

  7. Michael H. Berkens says

    December 22, 2011 at 1:02 pm

    Tony

    No plans for buyxxx.com

    I count 12 stories on Demand Media stock this year, it is one the largest companies in the domain space and the only one to go public this year.

    .XXX its again one of the top domain news stories of the year and a huge subject of interest based on traffic to the blog from search engines.

    We will continue to follow the hot stories and those that get lot of interest in the domain world.

  8. David says

    December 22, 2011 at 1:48 pm

    Do you think these could be a good portal for .xxx?
    GTLDxxx.com
    RegistrarXXX.com
    Rightxxx.com

    I own about 17 .xxx names with some LLL.xxx. Do you see any value in LLL.xxx?
    FOP.xxx – Free Online Porn
    FMP.xxx – Free Mobile Porn
    FOG.xxx – Free Online Girls
    FPV.xxx – Free Porn Videos
    Let me know what you think.
    Dave

  9. Brad says

    December 22, 2011 at 2:14 pm

    Either way the numbers are pretty embarrassing.

    Let’s take the lower number which is basically 50%.

    At best, that means for every 2 .XXX registered, 1 is a defensive registration.

    At the higher number more than 4 out of every 5 registrations are defensive.

    I would suspect the number is actually somewhere in between.

    ICM of course has really embraced the “protect your brand” marketing angle.

    Since the adult industry does not support the extension.
    Who else are they going to sell domains to?

    This is a perfect template of what brand owners are so afraid of with the new TLD program.

    Brad

  10. Alan says

    December 22, 2011 at 2:28 pm

    ICM’s marketing strategy is like a dirty diaper……………..a mess!

  11. Tony says

    December 22, 2011 at 2:59 pm

    David,

    Hate to burst your bubble but if I want free porn, I don’t need to visit a .xxx site when there’s Youporn.com, Porntube.com, Pornhub.com, etc.

    The extension is 10 years too late. The industry is mature and saturated on dotcom as of years ago.

  12. Jon says

    December 22, 2011 at 3:02 pm

    .xxx performed exceptionally poorly. Looks like final total will be several hundred thousand registrations, most of them one time defensive fees. Most of the others will drop after one year. A year from now there will be under 50,000 paid registrations, in a few years under 10,000.

  13. Gazzip says

    December 22, 2011 at 4:05 pm

    “ICM of course has really embraced the “protect your brand” marketing angle.

    Since the adult industry does not support the extension.”

    Agree, I really like the look of .xxx domains but the way its been promoted and handled has been pretty bizarre.

  14. Hmmmm says

    December 22, 2011 at 4:26 pm

    So one story has factual evidence, presents a copy of their findings and methodolgy and their calculations can be repeated by anyone with a copy of the zone, while the other story has no evidence and is based on speculation/opinion.

    Lo and behold, the story based on factual evidence reports 83% inactive domains. And plenty of other parking in the top nameservers (sedoparking, cashparking, etc.).

    Is this a successful registry?

    Depends on how you measure success.

    Do you measure by content, by traffic or by how many registrations you sell?

    Is anyone surprised at what .xxx is doing?

    Now if we could only get a copy of the .co zone.

    How much content is on .co domains as a percentage of the registry as a whole?

    Is this is a preview of what we can expect with new gTLD’s?

  15. TopDomainDeal says

    December 22, 2011 at 4:53 pm

    Soon or later regular businesses will give up registering .xxx domain for defensive purposes!
    It is getting ridiculous now.Domain names have been badly hit by this farce .XXX

  16. Tom G says

    December 22, 2011 at 4:54 pm

    Most defensive registrations in XXX will not see a repeat in new gtlds. Universities and others will not see the need to protect their image from damage in .DENTIST etc.

    Also, where the adult community is against XXX, many new gtlds have the support of their sponsoring communities, cities, industries.

  17. JamesD says

    December 22, 2011 at 5:24 pm

    Why do some people keep bleating on about the porn industry ‘not accepting’ .xxx? The porn industry like any other evolves with new players (nice pun eh?) entering (another one) the space. Who can say what they want?

    Only got two .xxx domains – both generic porn niches with good search vol – so my position is virtually neutral, but I’ll say this; there aren’t any top names being touted for sale – which means the owners believe in them long term. Not seen that with with other new TLDs.

  18. rob sequin says

    December 22, 2011 at 6:10 pm

    My take on all this is that all the .xxx news stories has taken porn to the main stream.

    I remember seeing a CNBC interview with Stuart Lawley about .xxx and porn in general.

    Love it or hate it, .xxx is bringing the conversation about internet porn to the masses.

  19. °°°°° FaceAnswers.com °°°°° says

    December 23, 2011 at 4:14 am

    Who Owns The Vatican.xxx Web Address? Not The Vatican

    huffingtonpost.com/2011/12/21/mystery-buyer-acquires-vatican-xxx_n_1163261.html

    just a big gift to the p0rn industry

  20. Timothy says

    December 27, 2011 at 11:16 am

    “Any inside story on Vatican x x x ”

    It was on a list of sensitive names that were on an automatic reserve list set up by ICANN.

  21. Michael H. Berkens says

    December 27, 2011 at 11:39 am

    Tim

    Don’t think there is an inside story, ICM put together a restricted list of thousands of sensitive terms, celebs names etc and didn’t allow them to be registered.


Recent Articles

  • Will $15M seem like a steal or a huge overpay 5 years from now for NFTs.com?
  • Sedo weekly domain name sales led by Afloat.com
  • Galileo.net from $4,050 to $50K in a little over a month

Recent Comments

  • Rex on Will $15M seem like a steal or a huge overpay 5 years from now for NFTs.com?
  • Joe on Will $15M seem like a steal or a huge overpay 5 years from now for NFTs.com?
  • steve on Will $15M seem like a steal or a huge overpay 5 years from now for NFTs.com?
  • MarkMajor on Will $15M seem like a steal or a huge overpay 5 years from now for NFTs.com?
  • Jon on Will $15M seem like a steal or a huge overpay 5 years from now for NFTs.com?

Polls

How Many .Web Domains Will Be Registered 1 Year After Launch

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Categories

Archives

domain name news

Copyright ©2019 TheDomains.com — Published by Worldwide Media, Inc. — Site by Nuts and Bolts Media