• Home
  • About Us
  • Contact
  • Advertise
  • Awards
  • Privacy Policy
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • RSS
TheDomains.com

Enom takes away “Cuba” domain names: What it Means to You in light of the Snowe Bill

March 4, 2008 by Michael Berkens

In an article published today in the New York Times, it was reviled that Enom.com shut down around 80 domains owned by a non-US citizen and resident, Steve Marshall.

It is important to note that, Mr. Marshall is a British national, lives in Spain where he operates a travel agency selling trips to Europeans who want to travel to Cuba and his servers are located in the Bahamas.

The only tie he had to the U.S. is that his domains were registered at a U.S. based registrar, Enom.com

According to the Times, the sites, which had been online since 1998, had been put on a Treasury Department blacklist and, Enom.com being an American domain name registrar, disabled them.

Enom.com took the action with NO notice to Mr. Marshall and apparently will not let Mr. Marshall transfer the domains to a non-US based registrar.

In the article Mr. Marshall was quoted as saying he did not understand “how Web sites owned by a British national operating via a Spanish travel agency can be affected by U.S. law.

When we first discussed the new Anti-Phishing Consumer Protection Act of 2008, sponsored by Senator Snowe, we took the position that the bill would not effect non-US citizens or residents.

However it appears that this may not be the case.

If the domain is registered with a US based Registrar, it seems the domain certainly may be subject to the bill.

Moreover some domain cases have held that since the main registry is located in Virginia, (VeriSign), then all domains, even if registered with a non-US based registrar maybe subject to the law.

In the case of cnn vs. cnnnews.com , the owners of the U.S. registered trade-mark CNN sued the domain namecnnnews.com which had been registered by a Chinese entity through a Chinese registrar.

The registrant argued that it did not have sufficient minimum contacts with the U.S. to subject it to U.S. jurisdiction, given that it conducted its business exclusively in China through its Chinese language web site and had registered the name through a Chinese registrar.

The Court in CNN the District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia held that in rem jurisdiction was proper because the domain name itself was located within the jurisdiction by virtue of the presence of the .com registry (VeriSign) in Virginia.

This case along with the actions of Enom.com today indicate that no one, regardless of where you live, or where your domain is registered, may be immune from the effect’s of this Proposed Bill.

Once again is crucial for everyone to join the ICA immediately and give money for them to fight.

It is not someone else’s problem .

It is your problem


Filed Under: Domain Industry, ICA

About Michael Berkens

Michael Berkens, Esq. is the founder and Editor-in-Chief of TheDomains.com. Michael is also the co-founder of Worldwide Media Inc. which sold around 70K domain to Godaddy.com in December 2015 and now owns around 8K domain names . Michael was also one of the 5 Judges selected for the the Verisign 30th Anniversary .Com contest.

« Google get 66% of all U.S. Internet Searches
Ask.com to become a Women Q & A Site »

Comments

  1. Dave Zan says

    March 5, 2008 at 10:52 pm

    Some insights on the subject:

    http://www.circleid.com/posts/83420_controversial_domain_names/

  2. JohnnyNight says

    March 19, 2008 at 2:49 pm

    Can someone tell me, that even though the Verisign company is headquartered in California, is Virginia still considered the federal district to file “in rem actions”, instead of California.

    Thanks

  3. admin says

    March 19, 2008 at 6:51 pm

    Johnny

    Network Solutions are headquartered in VA and the root name servers are located in VA.

  4. JohnnyNight says

    March 19, 2008 at 7:56 pm

    admin

    Thanks for the info.

    The reason I ask is that I am involved in a court case where the opposing side claims California is proper jurisdiction, because Verisign is located in California, and Verisign controls the registry.

    They did not make it clear though that the registry is actually in Virginia, but have left the impression with the court and myself, until today when I have found out the registry is actually in Virginia.

    So I am wondering if this will actually help me

  5. JohnnyNight says

    March 19, 2008 at 7:57 pm

    to go over that.

    have left the impression with the court and myself that the registry is actually in California.

  6. Jhon says

    April 1, 2008 at 2:56 pm

    Thanks good information.

  7. 2w says

    July 23, 2009 at 1:20 am

    hi greeting good afternoon ,

    we have some very-serious & similar issues with eNom ,

    could any1 tell us
    the email’s-address or the phone’s-# of top-managements of eNom ??
    ??

    our e-mail : fourcharities at hotmail.com

    cheers thank ye

  8. Rob Sequin says

    November 21, 2009 at 11:31 am

    Nothing has changed. The websites still do no resolve.

    What is even more odd is that Spanish hotel chain Sol Melia (which owns a couple dozen hotels in Cuba) has registered many of their domains at GoDaddy and I wrote about it here

    http://havanajournal.com/politics/entry/sol-melia-cuba-registers-more-domains-at-godaddy-and-has-ties-to-nyc-hotel/

    I guess it’s different for them?


Recent Articles

  • ChatGPT.net sells for $8,900 at DAN.com
  • What is a fair sales commission rate?
  • TXT.com sells for $300K

Recent Comments

  • James on What is a fair sales commission rate?
  • Richard on What is a fair sales commission rate?
  • Brad Mugford on What is a fair sales commission rate?
  • Dan on What is a fair sales commission rate?
  • Raymond Hackney on What is a fair sales commission rate?

Categories

Archives

Copyright ©2022 TheDomains.com — Published by Worldwide Media, Inc. — Site by Nuts and Bolts Media