Skip to content
TheDomains
Menu
  • Home
  • Advertise
  • Contact
  • Awards
  • Privacy Policy
  • About Us
Menu

Diamond.com Which Sold For $7.5 Million in 2006 Is Back On The Market

Posted on March 20, 2015
Share on Social Media
xfacebook
Follow us on Social Media
xfacebook

The domain name Diamond.com is back on the market and its being brokered by Godaddy.

In 2006 Ice.com bought the domain name Diamond.com for $7.5 Million from Odimo

According DnJournal.com, Diamond.com it is the 5th highest all cash domain sale of all time.

“If you consider that in nine years, the market has gone up, we hope for a better number than [the previous sale],” says Paul Nicks, senior director of aftermarket at GoDaddy. “If you look at the top end of the domain market, it’s all generic.”

“We are trying to identify folks who are either in the industry or outside,” he says. “Diamond is very versatile. It can also be used for credit card rewards or things of that nature. We want to make sure this gets the white glove treatment it deserves.”

Shmuel Gniwisch, former ice.com CEO, says his company wanted to sell the domain, as it is “slowly getting out of the online business.

According to the owner of Diamond.com the site gets “thousands of visitors each month and we are not spending any money. People feel it’s a destination to start off with.”

The press release goes on to note that the domain name ICE.com sold last year to the company that owns Build.com, I’m not sure that sale was previously reported anywhere.

 

10 thoughts on “Diamond.com Which Sold For $7.5 Million in 2006 Is Back On The Market”

  1. R P says:
    March 20, 2015 at 7:13 am

    Almost too generic for ecommerce purposes and most likely doesnt convert the free type in traffic.

    Plural diamonds.com much better but still not an exact match product that consumers typically search for AND purchase like diamond rings or diamond earrings

    If the end user is selling than apparently the domain isn’t working well or business is poorly run

    An amazing domain but I wouldn’t buy it

    1. dmpartners says:
      March 20, 2015 at 11:19 am

      Why pick Go Daddy to list it what a bad move that is. They will most certainly screw this up

  2. Spike says:
    March 20, 2015 at 9:26 am

    Great domain; however, the last buyer severely overpaid and will be lucky to get half what he paid for it.

    Would be a cool name for an online casino.

  3. todd says:
    March 20, 2015 at 12:04 pm

    The Diamond.com domain name, online business and inventory sold for 9.5 million in 2006. This was a complete package deal that included a full functioning business. The only reason Diamond.com was listed as sold for 7.5 million is because that’s the valuation that they placed on the domain name during the sale. This domain would not have had that valuation without the sale of the entire business.

    Does Godaddy really think they will get more than 7.5 million for this domain?

  4. Xavier Lemay says:
    March 20, 2015 at 12:17 pm

    Diamond.com is better then Diamonds.com.

    Why?

    Beacause you can use Diamond.com as a brand name and not only to sell diamonds.

  5. Danilo Perus says:
    March 20, 2015 at 1:06 pm

    Well, commenting if you are not involved is easy 🙂

    I have domain Tanzanite Diamonds dot Com.

    It has all attributes you are missing in this article:
    a) concrete name – Tanzanite is in fact the rarest diamond in the world
    b) domain ends with plural – diamonds
    c) price is of course very attractive

    Can I hope on some bids (at least some action) from your side:)

  6. Megan says:
    March 20, 2015 at 5:23 pm

    After doing some research, I want to correct your statement “The press release goes on to note that the domain name ICE.com sold last year to the company that owns Build.com.” The former VP of Marketing at Build.com, Brandon Proctor, went on to become the CEO of Ice.com. Ice.com is not owned by the same company who owns Build.com.

  7. Mark Jeftovic says:
    March 22, 2015 at 6:51 pm

    Delusional. The market hasn’t “gone up” since 2006. Aside from fewer and rarer exceptions it’s gone into the toilet. They’re lucky if they can get xxx,xxx for this now.

  8. Jeff Schneider says:
    March 22, 2015 at 8:04 pm

    Hello MHB,

    This is a pretty one dimensional name, and personally and professionally we think its strongest suite is its a .COM extension Platform name. We cannot as cannot anyone else predict what the next buyer will pay. Value is in the eye of the beholder.

    Gratefully, Jeff Schneider (Contact Group) (Metal Tiger)

  9. Mark says:
    October 22, 2016 at 10:13 am

    Must be loosing money if they are selling. Why depart with such a prized name that cost so much???
    Super stiff competition from hundreds of online diamond/jewelry sellers.

Comments are closed.

Search posts

©2026 TheDomains | TheDomains.com Theme