• Home
  • About Us
  • Contact
  • Advertise
  • Awards
  • Privacy Policy
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • RSS
TheDomains.com

Court of Justice of the European Union: “EU Cannot Order ISP’s To Prevent illegal Dowloading Of Files”

November 24, 2011 by Michael Berkens

While The US is proposing laws to make all sorts of Internet providers and companies to filter and block certain content in a ruling issued by the Court of Justice of the European Union today, the court ruled that “EU law precludes the imposition of an injunction by a national court which requires an internet service provider to install a filtering system with a view to preventing the illegal downloading of files”

“Such an injunction does not comply with the prohibition on imposing a general monitoring obligation on such a provider, or with the requirement to strike a fair balance between, on the one hand, the right to intellectual property, and, on the other, the freedom to conduct business, the right to protection of personal data and the freedom to receive or impart information”

“The Court finds that the injunction in question would require Scarlet to actively monitor all the data relating to each of its customers in order to prevent any infringement of intellectual-property rights. It follows that the injunction would impose general monitoring, something which is incompatible with the E-Commerce Directive.”

“It is true that the protection of the right to intellectual property is enshrined in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU. There is, however, nothing whatsoever in the wording of the Charter or in the Court’s case-law to suggest that that right is inviolable and must for that reason be absolutely protected.”

“In the present case, the injunction requiring the installation of a filtering system involves monitoring, in the interests of copyright holders, all electronic communications made through the network of the internet service provider concerned. That monitoring, moreover, is not limited in time. Such an injunction would thus result in a serious infringement of Scarlet’s freedom to conduct its business as it would require Scarlet to install a complicated, costly, permanent computer system at its own expense.”

“What is more, the effects of the injunction would not be limited to Scarlet, as the filtering system would also be liable to infringe the fundamental rights of its customers, namely their right to protection of their personal data and their right to receive or impart information, which are rights safeguarded by the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU.”

“”It is common ground, first, that the injunction would involve a systematic analysis of all content and the collection and identification of users’ IP addresses from which unlawful content on the network is sent. Those addresses are protected personal data. “”

“”Secondly, the injunction could potentially undermine freedom of information since that system might not distinguish adequately between unlawful content and lawful content, with the result that its introduction could lead to the blocking of lawful communications.

“”Consequently, the Court finds that, in adopting the injunction requiring Scarlet to install such a filtering system, the national court would not be respecting the requirement that a fair balance be struck between the right to intellectual property, on the one hand, and the freedom to conduct business, the right to protection of personal data and the right to receive or impart information, on the other.

“Accordingly, the Court’s reply is that EU law precludes an injunction made against an internet service provider requiring it to install a system for filtering all electronic communications passing via its services which applies indiscriminately to all its customers, as a preventive measure, exclusively at its expense, and for an unlimited period.”

Filed Under: Legal

About Michael Berkens

Michael Berkens, Esq. is the founder and Editor-in-Chief of TheDomains.com. Michael is also the co-founder of Worldwide Media Inc. which sold around 70K domain to Godaddy.com in December 2015 and now owns around 8K domain names . Michael was also one of the 5 Judges selected for the the Verisign 30th Anniversary .Com contest.

« Buy.XXX Media Blitz Starts Tonight
Another Thanksgiving & Another 131 Domain Names Seized By Homeland Security »

Comments

  1. Jonathan says

    November 25, 2011 at 4:43 am

    That is a well balanced statement that justifies the right decision. It is a statement that could be re-hashed by opponents of the of the US proposed laws to good effect without paying out for legal advice.
    Noted an authoratative comment & info links regarding proposed laws on another domain blog http://dannosblog.com/2011/11/18/2116/ It is good to see the silent majority voicing its opinion over this real threat to democracy.


Recent Articles

  • Sedo weekly domain name sales led by Sulamericasaude.com
  • NameJet/SnapNames May 2023 sales report led by Agon.com
  • NamesCon live auction less than 24 hours away

Recent Comments

  • MarkMajor on Sedo weekly domain name sales led by zCompany.com
  • J.R. on John Berryhill posts a warning about dealing with GoDaddy brokers
  • DimeScout on John Berryhill posts a warning about dealing with GoDaddy brokers
  • Mark Thorpe on John Berryhill posts a warning about dealing with GoDaddy brokers
  • No Daddy on John Berryhill posts a warning about dealing with GoDaddy brokers

Categories

Archives

Copyright ©2022 TheDomains.com — Published by Worldwide Media, Inc. — Site by Nuts and Bolts Media