• Home
  • About Us
  • Contact
  • Advertise
  • Awards
  • Privacy Policy
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • RSS
TheDomains.com

Goldman Sachs Invests $450 Million Into Facebook Making Its Valuation $50 Billion

January 3, 2011 by Michael Berkens

On the 1st business day of 2011, Facebook has a $50 Billion dollar Valuation thanks to an investment of $450 Million dollars by Goldman Sachs.

According to mulitple reports, Goldman’s investment of $450 Million was paired with another $50 Million dollar investment by Digital Sky Technologies, a Russian investment company that already invested $500 Million into Facebook.

Therefore this round of financing was $500 Million invested based on at a $50 Billion Valuation.

Facebook shares split 5 for 1 in the past year and the price of the shares as traded on Sharespost.com have tripled in the past year as well.

Last week Groupon reportedly received $500 Million in investment as well, meaning the year is off to a big start.

Filed Under: Internet News

About Michael Berkens

Michael Berkens, Esq. is the founder and Editor-in-Chief of TheDomains.com. Michael is also the co-founder of Worldwide Media Inc. which sold around 70K domain to Godaddy.com in December 2015 and now owns around 8K domain names . Michael was also one of the 5 Judges selected for the the Verisign 30th Anniversary .Com contest.

« In 2010: China Shuts Down 60,000 Sites, 4,500 Criminal Investigations & Sends 1,332 To Jail
Sedo Increases Sales Commission 50%; From 10% to 15% : For “Domain Sales By Our Sales Team” Without Notice »

Comments

  1. Tony says

    January 3, 2011 at 11:10 am

    Mind-bogglingly overvalued.

  2. TLD says

    January 3, 2011 at 11:17 am

    This is an insane valuation.

    People should consider how fast Myspace fell. And Facebook’s business model is a little lacking.

  3. TheBigLieSociety says

    January 3, 2011 at 11:21 am

    ://dealbook.nytimes.com/2011/01/03/why-facebook-is-such-an-important-friend-for-goldman-sachs/
    …
    “In 1956, Goldman advised a prominent Detroit family named Ford on the I.P.O. of its car company.”
    …
    “When Ralph Lauren sold $1 billion of stock last year to cash out a quarter of his stake in his company, Goldman sold it for him.”
    …
    “Then there is Meg Whitman and eBay, the online auction site. Goldman put the bear hug on eBay as it was becoming one of the hottest Internet companies…”
    …
    “the Facebook investment represents a negligible percentage of the firm’s roughly $900 billion balance sheet”

  4. Ace says

    January 3, 2011 at 11:28 am

    ~75% of Tech-Investments fail. That’s why they are called investments.

  5. Shaun says

    January 3, 2011 at 11:50 am

    “People should consider how fast Myspace fell. And Facebook’s business model is a little lacking.”

    Proof that domainers should never discuss modern tech.

  6. Gazzip says

    January 3, 2011 at 12:06 pm

    “…based on at a $50 Billion Valuation.”

    I don’t understand why people are pumping money into Facebook at such a rate, Is that valuation based on a multiple of actual profits or just a wing and a prayer for what “might be” ?

    How much real profit did they make in 2009, 2010?

    I don’t know much about Facebook but reading this article it does’nt seem as if he cares whether he makes a profit or not.

    “Mark Zuckerberg: Facebook doesn’t make real profits, and that’s okay”

    “There’s no point right now in having a massive profit,” Zuckerberg said.”

    “His initial indifference toward revenue is almost legendary at this point, at least in the startup world. Even now, Zuckerberg said he’s not that interested in making money.”

    venturebeat.com/2010/10/16/facebook-mark-zuckerberg-profits/
    ———

    Pretty weired comments considering people are investing so much of their money in them.

    Can someone explain to dumb old me why the big attraction to invest ?

    “~75% of Tech-Investments fail. That’s why they are called investments.”

    Nowadays its hard to tell the difference between an Investment and a Ponzi scheme 😉

    Anyone ever watch the Keiser Report ?

  7. Good Domain Names says

    January 3, 2011 at 12:13 pm

    At the same time there´s rumour Google may come out with an iTunes rival and is already in talks with publishers.

  8. TheBigLieSociety says

    January 3, 2011 at 12:27 pm

    “he’s not that interested in making money… Pretty weired comments considering people are investing so much of their money in them. Can someone explain to dumb old me why the big attraction to invest ?”
    ====

    “he’s not that interested in making money…”

    That is part of the Silicon Valley Shtick
    All the big players take $1 salary per year and ride the equity wave (and loans)

    The East Coast (New York) Cocktail.Party investor crowd loves the Silicon Valley Shtick – It is easy to leverage that in their pump and pump world

    It all drives eyeballs and traffic which is how some measure success…

  9. Landon White says

    January 3, 2011 at 12:47 pm

    It’s O K

    Mark Snookerburg always comes out on top

    you can ask the Twin brothers …

  10. LS Morgan says

    January 3, 2011 at 12:57 pm

    “All the big players take $1 salary per year and ride the equity wave (and loans)”

    Hahahahaha…. Listen for that all-too-familiar clicking noise, signifying the ratcheting up of salaries and equity stakes, and the sucking sound on the other end once the delusion kicks into full swing and the divestment begins.

    Your entire post was dead on. It’s 1998 all over again.

  11. Landon White says

    January 3, 2011 at 1:02 pm

    Talking about being snookered

    Mason Jar COLE for Moniker/Oversee …

    Just released a statement over on ricks blog Jan,03 12:03pm

    They are going to fully hide behind the human resource cloak…

    In short …this is none of your business! …

    ://www.ricksblog.com/my_weblog/2010/12/the-privacy-issuewho-has-access-to-that-info-what-they-can-do-with-it.html#comments

  12. TLD says

    January 3, 2011 at 1:14 pm

    @ Shaun

    Maybe you weren’t born yet when Friendster was around.

  13. TheBigLieSociety says

    January 3, 2011 at 2:06 pm

    The Achilles Heel of Facebook, Google and many others is of course the Thin-Client/Server architecture compared to true Peer-2-Peer.

    As the CEO of Google, Eric Schmidt, always asks, “Who is going to pay the electric bill for all the servers/disks/etc. ?”

    Migrating domains to Peer-2-Peer and of course Web Hosting is in progress. People do not pay much attention or understand the technology. All they care about is the “Brand” and the traffic and the sizzle, not the steak.

  14. Soc.TV says

    January 3, 2011 at 2:15 pm

    One of the many reasons for this high valuation on FB is the fact that their competition is contracting while they’re expanding. I would not be surprised to see a $100 Billion valuation on FB within 4-5 years.

    – TBC (Soc.TV)

  15. Aggro says

    January 3, 2011 at 2:19 pm

    For those still scratching their heads at ‘valuation’…this is a prime example of how the investment world works.

    Buy high, sell higher

    All the early investors will make multiples of their grubstake when it goes IPO.

    ******
    In short the most important lesson the ‘unwashed’ will learn about valuations & the stock market is:
    Short term = voting machine
    Long term = weighing machine
    ******

  16. rkb says

    January 3, 2011 at 2:25 pm

    FB is wayyyyyyyy overrrrrrr priced imo.

    Early investors will make money while all others will lose imo.

    ON A SIDE NOTE, look at the best domain offer I ever got.
    This just came in today:
    —————————-

    I am interested in using your URL, LoanHD. Can you make it available? Thank you.

    —————————

    lol

  17. Shaun says

    January 3, 2011 at 2:51 pm

    @TLD,

    Maybe you’re too dull to realize that facebook and friendster have very little in common.

  18. GhettoCaveMan says

    January 3, 2011 at 5:08 pm

    Whenever the “private” banking arm of U.S.A., inc. gets involved, you know someone/something is getting scammed at some point in the time-line of the deal.

  19. The Big Cheese says

    January 3, 2011 at 5:13 pm

    @CaveMan,

    These guys only bet on sure things. Social-Mobile is the future. FB is at the center of it all.

    – TBC

  20. Virtual World says

    January 3, 2011 at 6:04 pm

    So the $500 million investment must have gotten 1% of Facebook, to give a $50 billion valuation.

    I don’t find it to hard to believe, Facebook is the de facto meeting place on the web, nothing comes even close. Google and MSN, with all their billions, can’t create a serious competitor.

    The beauty of Facebook, the most visited website in the US last year, is that they don’t face competition or keep having to come up with new and innovative products all the time – like Apple or Amazon. And the premise is simple, keep in touch with family and friends, share photos and links, play games, etc. in the biggest virtual community in the world.

    No one will ever leave because everyone else they know is on FB. Sure nothing is guaranteed for Facebook to last, but on the other hand there is no serious competition on the horizon – FG would have to do a very serious blunder to lose their position at this point in time.

  21. Virtual World says

    January 3, 2011 at 6:11 pm

    Oops, my last reference to FG I meant to say FB.

    Should also add, you can’t really compare Facebook to MySpace or Friendster.

    How many people do you know on Facebook?

    Now, how many people did you ever know on MySpace or Friendster?

    I would compare Facebook more to other websites that have had longevity, like Google or Ebay.

    If you want to compare market caps, Google is at 193B, ebay at 37B, Yahoo 22B, Apple 302B, Microsoft at 239B.

  22. Soc.tv says

    January 3, 2011 at 6:31 pm

    @Virtual World,

    So, using the valuations in your post (assuming they’re correct), FB is worth as much as Goog & APPL combined? Wow, just wow…

    – TBC

  23. TheBigLieSociety says

    January 3, 2011 at 6:40 pm

    “nothing is guaranteed for Facebook to last, but on the other hand there is no serious competition on the horizon”
    ====

    China now has 100 orders for 737-class jets to replace Boeing and Airbus [C919]

    Skype is loaded into many motherboards that boot Linux (not BIOS)

    True Peer-2-Peer technology is very hard for people to see “on the horizon”
    …speaking and reading Chinese helps…

  24. Louise says

    January 3, 2011 at 8:08 pm

    Is Goldman Sachs “holding securities of record is used primarily to circumvent the provisions of Section 12(g) or 15(d) of the [Securities Exchange] Act?” Then, “the beneficial owners of such securities shall be deemed to be the record owners thereof.” That’s what the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 states, in its definition of “Held of Record.” The truth is going to come out. – http://taft.law.uc.edu/CCL/34ActRls/rule12g5-1.html

  25. MHB says

    January 3, 2011 at 8:13 pm

    Louise

    Circumvent is one word, get around would be another term anyway the mainstream press is already on this

    http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2011/01/03/facebook-and-the-500-person-threshold/

  26. HNN.TV says

    January 3, 2011 at 8:16 pm

    What happens to Google, Apple, and Microsoft if Facebook decides to create its own search engine, mobile phone, and proprietary mobile-OS? Facebook is the hottest company on the planet right now and they’ve got the sizzle to do whatever they want. Should be fun to watch.

    I’d love to see a Facebook-Groupon merger.

    – TBC (HNN.TV)

  27. owen frager says

    January 3, 2011 at 8:58 pm

    There is no profit now. But there could be huge profit if they charge an annual fee, which they should with corporate accounts who advertise their Facebook pages on TV paying their fees based on size of company revenue. If they just provide a living room like MySpace did for people to come in and make money cutting them out, they will fail. If only 10% opt to pay that’s still 50 million at average $10/ month for individual and $500 for corporate. HUGE! Why would someone want to pay? That’s what they said when cable was introduced to TV. The reason is because they are addicted. And like selling cigarettes, that’s the marketing strategy now- “addict em’ and empty their wallets later when they can’t refuse.”

  28. VSN.TV says

    January 3, 2011 at 9:14 pm

    This post prodded me to hand-reg’ VSN.TV (Video Social Network). There remains tremendous profit potential in the social-networking space, even for late-comers. The key is in creating new niches within the social-networking paradigm – I and my partners are working hard on developing multiple projects in this space.

    – TBC (VSN.TV – Soc.TV – Together.TV)

  29. LS Morgan says

    January 3, 2011 at 10:52 pm

    “But there could be huge profit if they charge an annual fee, which they should with corporate accounts who advertise their Facebook pages on TV paying their fees based on size of company revenue.”

    The corporate pay-to model is one piece, but insignificant, IMO.
    Their real goldmine is in their ads and the ability to target demographics down to the subatomic level. Right now, their ad filtering protocols are still pretty broad, relative to what they could (and should) be. I started experimenting with fb ads pretty early on and have found them to convert like fire (better than G), assuming one knows the basics in picking the right audience.

    Facebook is an eyeball factory no different than any other “look at me” web app, but with ubiquitousness. That’s where the strength is. Depending on what one sells, $X in facebook ads might be superior to that same amount spent on a superbowl commercial.

  30. SocialDealMap says

    January 4, 2011 at 1:01 am

    I don’t think there’s any over valuation for FB and Goldman Sachs is way much smarter than we average people do. FB is already taking over GOOG as the top Internet traffic destination and most searched over.

  31. INTERNET MEDIA says

    January 4, 2011 at 9:00 am

    It’s not about the FB valuation for Goldman Sachs. GS made the investment in Facebook to secure it’s position as the primary securities brokerage for the future IPO….

    IPO valuation at $50B, what do you think GS would make in fees?

  32. TheBigLieSociety says

    January 4, 2011 at 10:02 am

    “It’s not about the FB valuation for Goldman Sachs. GS made the investment in Facebook to secure it’s position”
    ====

    It’s not about the FB valuation for Goldman Sachs. GS made the investment in Facebook to secure it’s [Spin]&[Schtick] position [with the Lame.Stream.Media].

    [It is not what you know, it is WHO you know and who you hang.out with…]

    [Other people’s money – Other people’s time – Other people’s tweets – YOUR brand]

  33. BFitz says

    January 4, 2011 at 10:06 am

    So that’s about $100 per FB user which is less what Groupon values each subscriber. I had someone in a hot sector tell me that their FB ad results quickly tapered because its a captive audience but my sites produce unique, targeted, visitors each day. FB is not going anywherebut the shine for outside companies will fade.

  34. TheBigLieSociety says

    January 4, 2011 at 10:18 am

    “So that’s about $100 per FB user…unique, targeted, visitors each day”
    =====

    Imagine if you had 75,000+ domain names and could channel all of the “unique, targeted, visitors each day” into YOUR BRAND

    What BRAND would you build ?

    Disney?
    Playboy?
    Oprah?
    Vegas?

  35. Together.TV says

    January 5, 2011 at 11:24 am

    Facebook overtakes Google to become the #1 most visited site on the web:

    http://www.dp-news.com/pages/detail.aspx?l=2&articleId=68804

  36. GhettoCaveMan says

    January 5, 2011 at 1:01 pm

    Nice little write-up on what Goldman is up to from the Wall Street Journal:

    http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704723104576062280540485652.html?mod=WSJ_hp_LEFTTopStories

    Fear not, the SEC is all over it – lol.

    Remember, never take the other side of Goldman’s trades. If you do trade with (same side) or invest with Goldman, be sure to tithe your 10% every time because your gonna need all the help you can get.

  37. D8.TV says

    January 5, 2011 at 1:19 pm

    “you don’t tug on superman’s cape…you don’t spit into the wind…”

  38. GenericDomainMarket says

    January 6, 2011 at 1:03 pm

    ComScore: U.S. Online Holiday Shopping Season Reaches Record $32.6 Billion for November-December Period, Up 12 Percent vs. Year Ago

    http://www.comscore.com/Press_Events/Press_Releases/2011/1/U.S._Online_Holiday_Shopping_Season_Reaches_Record_32.6_Billion_for_November_December_Period

    Looking forward to a great year in 2011 .. Don’t we all!

  39. MHB says

    January 17, 2011 at 2:33 pm

    UPDATE:

    Goldman Sachs decided to exclude U.S. clients from the private offering of as much as $1.5 billion in shares of social-networking company Facebook, citing “intense media attention.”

    In a statement provided to The Wall Street Journal, Goldman said the move came after officials at the New York securities firm “concluded the level of media attention might not be consistent with the proper completion of a U.S. private placement under U.S. law.”

    http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703396604576087941210274036.html?mod=djemalertMARKET

  40. owen frager says

    January 17, 2011 at 5:51 pm

    So Mike, that reenforces the fact that the government has their back.


Recent Articles

  • Rick is older than the Pope!
  • The Greatest Domain Stories of all time – Part 1
  • Sedo weekly domain name sales led by Borj.com

Recent Comments

  • Jay on Rick is older than the Pope!
  • John on The Greatest Domain Stories of all time – Part 1
  • Francois on Rick Schwartz details every domain he has acquired since 2022
  • Zip on Rick Schwartz details every domain he has acquired since 2022
  • John on Rick Schwartz details every domain he has acquired since 2022

Categories

Archives