Skip to content
TheDomains
Menu
  • Home
  • Advertise
  • Contact
  • Awards
  • Privacy Policy
  • About Us
Menu

We Drop a Note in GoDaddy’s Suggestion Box and TDNAM Changes

Posted on March 31, 2008
Share on Social Media
xfacebook
Follow us on Social Media
xfacebook

A couple of weeks ago I chatted with Tess Diaz, Domain Asset Advisor with Godaddy.

She called asking if we had any suggestions for improving the TDNAM auction platform for expired domains.

We suggested that TDNAM should not show any expired auction domains in the “most active” category if they only had one bid.

Our argument was that a domain having one bidder, does not make it “most active”

Actually you need two bidders to have an auction.

We thought it was unfair that those who spent the time to mine through the lists of expired domains and placed the first bid on a domain, would have the spotlight then shined on the domain by the auction house and placed on the most active list.

Last week Tess e-mailed me back and let me know that my suggestion was being adopted by Godaddy and that TDNAM “most active” list for their expired domain auctions would start showing only domains with at least 2 bids.

So if you know look at TDNAM you will not see any expired auctions listed with 1 bid on the most active list. 

This makes all that hard work of manually going through the Godaddy expired auction list worth the effort, as you may find a gem that no one else is bidding on.

We hope that the other domain auction services, NameJet.com and Snapnames.com adopt a similar policy in the near future.

Once again this goes to show if you make an effort, sometimes you can get something done.

11 thoughts on “We Drop a Note in GoDaddy’s Suggestion Box and TDNAM Changes”

  1. Alan says:
    March 31, 2008 at 10:15 pm

    Very Very good advice. Well done Michael.

  2. Mathias says:
    April 1, 2008 at 12:40 am

    Awesome. That is a great improvement. Now it is more worth while researching GD expiring names knowing you might actually get something with a single bid.

  3. Tim Davids says:
    April 1, 2008 at 7:40 am

    nice job…thanks…I’m sure I paid a few more bucks the past few years due to the 1 bid exposure…

  4. admin says:
    April 1, 2008 at 10:03 am

    Tim

    We all did

  5. Greg Nelson says:
    April 1, 2008 at 12:31 pm

    That is a GREAT idea. TDNAM is very responsive actually and amazingly if you are patient and screen well there are some nice buys on their lists.

    ChopperRentals.com was one I really liked at TDnam a week or so ago, but I was “out” that day. Sure someone got a nice buy.

  6. Steve M says:
    April 1, 2008 at 1:10 pm

    Actually, whether this change was a good or bad one depends on whether you’re a seller or a buyer…which goes to the question of who the 3rd party domain sellers are the fiduciaries of; if they’re agents of either.

    How do you tell your sellers you’re great at getting them top dollar for their domains…while concurrently telling your buyers (often the same people) that they’re getting great deals?

    The paradox of dual agency.

  7. admin says:
    April 1, 2008 at 1:57 pm

    Steve

    The change effected only the EXPIRED domain auction, as I explained in the post.

    As far as I know the former owner of an expired domain at Godaddy does not get anything from Godaddy if his domain is sold after his registration expires, whether the domain sells for $10 or $10 million dollars.

    So basically in this instance the only seller is Godaddy, think it just one of those changes you are going to have to accept as being all good.

  8. CCC says:
    April 1, 2008 at 9:22 pm

    Tess has a really smooth, sexy voice – don’t you think? She’s sweet too.

    I like your suggestion. It makes it feel like there is a reason to keep looking then to have every domain hound sniffin’.

  9. admin says:
    April 2, 2008 at 7:14 am

    Tess

    Is very nice and she gets it done

  10. Edward Bruner says:
    September 23, 2009 at 3:02 pm

    Seriously? I would have thought that this was all too obvious by now.

  11. stephen douglas says:
    September 23, 2009 at 11:28 pm

    Hi Mike,

    Your suggestions threw me at first, too. I thought “why wouldn’t the seller WANT some attention when his domain got a bid?” Then I realized that it was TDNAM (worst name for a domain-aftermarket website I’ve ever heard/seen!). These are GD’s domains, so it doesn’t make a difference if the bidder count is revealed. Great advice to GD on this.

    On another note: As for the private auctions, they should always have a column that shows how many bidders there are for a domain (“1” “2” “4” “10”) etc. I think the key for a domain auction representing a seller is that the domain gets plenty of promotion beforehand. This can be cheaply done by reaching potential buyers with some simple banner ads placed on relevant industry websites to the domain’s prodservs. This way, a “private” auction really doesn’t become just a “listing” of the domain. One bidder, at the reserve price, is a “listing sale”, not an “auction sale” IMHO. Private auctions shouldn’t charge more than 10% for selling a domain that gets only one bidder at the reserve price.

    Great article.

Comments are closed.

Search posts

©2026 TheDomains | TheDomains.com Theme