<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Domains</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thedomains.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thedomains.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 17:02:13 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Next Big Money Domains: TajMahal.com, Filth.com</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2009/07/03/next-big-money-domains-tajmahalcom-filthcom/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thedomains.com/2009/07/03/next-big-money-domains-tajmahalcom-filthcom/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 17:02:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>MHB</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Domain Auctions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=4071</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There are 2 domains still at backorder at Namejet.com that looks like they are going to sell into the five figures.
TajMahal.com is currently at $8K with the backorder deadline closes at 11pm EST tonight.
Filth.com is currently at $5K with the backorder deadline closing tomorrow at 11PM.
You can see some of our other picks at NameJet.com [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are 2 domains still at backorder at Namejet.com that looks like they are going to sell into the five figures.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.namejet.com/Pages/Auctions/BackorderDetails.aspx?domainname=tajmahal.com">TajMahal.com</a> is currently at $8K with the backorder deadline closes at 11pm EST tonight.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.namejet.com/Pages/Auctions/BackorderDetails.aspx?domainname=filth.com">Filth.com</a> is currently at $5K with the backorder deadline closing tomorrow at 11PM.</p>
<p>You can see some of our other picks at <a href="http://www.thedomains.com/2009/06/27/our-first-maybe-last-namejetcom-picks/">NameJet.com here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thedomains.com/2009/07/03/next-big-money-domains-tajmahalcom-filthcom/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google.com Sued Again But This Time Its Not Just Over PPC:  Organic Search Removal</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2009/07/03/googlecom-sued-again-but-this-time-its-not-just-over-ppc-organic-search-removal/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thedomains.com/2009/07/03/googlecom-sued-again-but-this-time-its-not-just-over-ppc-organic-search-removal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 14:44:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>MHB</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Legal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=4065</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For the fifth time since May, Google has been sued for trademark infringement on AdWords.
This lawsuit, brought by computer software company Ascentive, in the federal district court in the eastern district of Pennsylvania, alleges that Google wrongly allowed other companies to use Ascentive&#8217;s trademarks to trigger pay-per-click search ads.
Nothing new there,  but the suit does [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For the fifth time since May, Google has been sued for trademark infringement on AdWords.</p>
<p><a href="http://docs.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/pennsylvania/paedce/2:2009cv02871/310256/1/">This lawsuit</a>, brought by computer software company Ascentive, in the federal district court in the eastern district of Pennsylvania, alleges that Google wrongly allowed other companies to use Ascentive&#8217;s trademarks to trigger pay-per-click search ads.</p>
<p>Nothing new there,  but the suit does on to allege that Google wrongly removed the company from the organic results listing of Google.</p>
<p>Ascentive alleges that Google removed the Ascentive site FinallyFast.com from the organic search results earlier this year. The company says that traffic then plummeted to around 500,000 visitors a month, from 1.9 million in January.</p>
<p>In its lawsuit, filed , the company alleges it owns the trademarks on a host of terms including FinallyFast.com, FastAtLast.com and Spyware Striker.</p>
<p>Ascentive complains that Google allows rivals to purchase terms like Finally Fast as keywords that triggered ads for their sites. &#8220;Google&#8217;s unauthorized and willful use and sale of Ascentive&#8217;s trademarks in connection with its advertising programs &#8230; is likely to cause confusion, mistake or deception as to the source of the goods and services offered,&#8221;</p>
<p>Google has prevailed in at least one other lawsuit where a company complained that it was wrongly removed from the organic search results. In that case, directory and search engine <a href="http://www.linksandlaw.com/news-update42-kinderstart-google.htm">KinderStart.com unsuccessfully sued Google after it stopped showing KinderStart&#8217;s site in the results</a>.</p>
<p>Not only did a federal district court judge in California throw out the case, but ordered KinderStart&#8217;sto pay $7,500 in sanctions for having brought the action.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thedomains.com/2009/07/03/googlecom-sued-again-but-this-time-its-not-just-over-ppc-organic-search-removal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Comment Period For The Uniform Rapid Suspension (URS) Closes On Monday:</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2009/07/03/comment-period-for-the-uniform-rapid-suspension-urs-closes-on-monday/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thedomains.com/2009/07/03/comment-period-for-the-uniform-rapid-suspension-urs-closes-on-monday/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 12:45:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>MHB</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[ICA]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[ICANN]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[New Extensions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=4057</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We have talked about it since it came out, and now the time to put your comments on record at ICANN for the proposed Uniform Rapid Suspension (URS).
The comment period closes on Monday July 6th.
Although the URS on its face only applies to the new gTLD&#8217;s, comments made by representatives of ICANN clearly indicate that [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.thedomains.com/2009/06/01/hate-udrps-say-hello-to-something-much-worse-the-uniform-rapid-suspension-system-urs/">We have talked about it since it came out</a>, and now the time to put your comments on record at ICANN for the proposed Uniform Rapid Suspension (URS).</p>
<p>The comment period closes on Monday July 6th.</p>
<p>Although the URS on its face only applies to the new gTLD&#8217;s, <a href="http://www.thedomains.com/2009/06/25/it%E2%80%99s-official-icann-wants-the-proposed-uniform-rapid-suspension-urs-rules-to-apply-to-coms/">comments made by representatives of ICANN clearly indicate that they will in fact apply to all existing extensions </a>(.com. .net. &amp;.org) meaning all the domains you own sooner than later.</p>
<p>If you didn&#8217;t read our initial post on the proposal set forth by trademark holder groups, you should go read it now, since it is arguably the worst thing to happen to domain holders certainly since the Snow Bill.</p>
<p>We will be posting our thoughts on Monday in our comments to ICANN but that shouldn&#8217;t stop you from learning about the proposal and taking a hour of the weekend, dedicated to the independence of our country, to compose a response to a this proposal which seeks to take away your property.</p>
<p>Actually what is actually closing on Monday is the comment period for the report of The Implementation Recommendation Team (IRT) which contains, among other things the Uniform Rapid Suspension proposal.</p>
<p>Background information and links to the final Report can be found by <a href="http://www.icann.org/en/announcements/announcement-4-29may09-en.htm">clicking here</a>.</p>
<p>Comments should be submitted to:</p>
<p>irt-final-report@icann.org</p>
<p>Once you e-mail your comments to ICANN you will receive an e-mail from ICANN asking you to confirm the submission.  Until and unless you respond to that e-mail,  your comments will not be posted or seen by ICANN so it is essential you answer the e-mail.</p>
<p>Although our comments will not be available until Monday, you can use the comments of the <a href="http://www.internetcommerce.org/">Internet Commerce Association</a> (ICA) and George Kirikos as a guide.</p>
<p>From the ICA:</p>
<p>&#8220;&#8221;"&#8221;While each individual should focus on those aspects of the Report of greatest concern to him, major points that will be made in the comment letter being prepared by the ICA are:<br />
·     The IRT operated in violation of ICANN Bylaws requirements for maximum transparency and fair representation. It voted to operate confidentiality; its agenda and membership was controlled by the Intellectual Property Constituency (IPC); and it included no members of the domain investment community. Not surprisingly, its recommendations lack balance and constitute proposed UDRP reform undertaken solely from the perspective of complainants.</p>
<p>·        The Uniform Rapid Suspension (URS) proposal would effectively displace the UDRP at all new gTLDs and substantially diminish registrants’ procedural and substantive due process rights. The extreme low cost of filing complaints (as little as $1.50 per domain in mass filings) and the lack of effective sanctions (abusive complainants barred from the URS for one year, and then only after three separate incidents of abuse, with no monetary sanctions or indemnification requirements) would encourage abusive complaint filings. There is also a lack of effective or affordable substantive appeals procedures for registrants who believe that their domains have been unfairly suspended. Further, trademark interests have already voiced the goal of imposing the URS on incumbent gTLDs, including .com, soon after its adoption for new gTLDs.</p>
<p>·        Other report recommendations, such as the Globally Protected Marks List (GPML), appear to be both infeasible and have no basis in existing trademark law; their adoption would impermissibly expand ICANN’s function to that of a DNS treaty organization or legislature.</p>
<p>·        While the domain investment community is willing to engage constructively with trademark interests, that must occur through a standard but expedited  ICANN Policy Development Process (PDP) that is open to all affected interests, transparent in its operation, and balanced in its membership and recommendations. This can result in UDRP reforms applicable to both new and incumbent gTLDs that provide redress to the current problems and abuses faced by both registrants and complainants. It would be an unacceptable precedent to allow a single ICANN constituency to control a short term, ad hoc group and have its skewered policy recommendations implemented absent further review and input by the broad ICANN community.</p>
<p>The close of the comment period is not the end of this process. On Monday, July 13th ICANN will hold in New York City the first of four full day global consultations on the new gTLD program, free and open to all who have pre-registered, with a focus on trademark protection and the potential for malicious behavior. The NYC consultation will be followed by one in London on July 15th; Hong Kong on July 24th; and Abu-Dhabi on August 4th. Information about these consultations and a link to the pre-registration page can be found by clicking <a href="http://www.icann.org/en/topics/new-gtlds/consultation-outreach-en.htm">here</a>:</p>
<p>We know that the trademark community is actively encouraging its members to attend and speak out at these consultations, so it is vitally important that the domain investment community, as well as the many other constituencies and organizations that have raised strong concerns about the IRT process and recommendations, be in attendance as well.</p>
<p>ICANN Counsel Philip Corwin is planning to attend the NYC consultation and would appreciate being advised by those in the domainer community and other groups concerned by the IRT Report who are planning to attend – he can be reached by e-mail at pcorwin@butera-andrews.com.</p>
<p>Freedom is never free. Please take the time this weekend to send a comment to ICANN, and please consider attending one of the upcoming global consultations – because those who would diminish registrant rights are already planning to do so.&#8221;"&#8221;</p>
<p>If you want to check out Mr. Kirikos comments (I urge you to do so) you can <a href="http://forum.icann.org/lists/irt-final-report/msg00084.html">click here</a>:</p>
<p>You need to understand what additional rights trademark holders are trying to grant themselves against your direct interest as a domain holder.</p>
<p>If you have no interest in this then you have no interest in your own property.</p>
<p>ALL of you need to support the ICA.</p>
<p>For the like millionth time, the ICA is the ONLY organization representing your interest as a domain holder.</p>
<p>Trademark holders got plenty of support and actually got their group in a position with ICANN to write the rules.</p>
<p>By not spending $295 a year, (again 4 backorders on namejet) you allowed it to happen.</p>
<p>Now you can at least spend a few bucks and have a voice in this process.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thedomains.com/2009/07/03/comment-period-for-the-uniform-rapid-suspension-urs-closes-on-monday/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>TheJayLenoShow.com Goes To the Rightful Owner</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2009/07/02/thejaylenoshowcom-goes-to-the-rightful-owner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thedomains.com/2009/07/02/thejaylenoshowcom-goes-to-the-rightful-owner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 00:40:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>MHB</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Legal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=4049</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It seems like a no-brainier to me, but I have seen at least 10 stories in the mainstream media about this today and no one reported it on domaining.com, so I&#8217;ll bite.
TheJayLenoShow.com was ordered transferred to Mr. Leno in a WIPO action today.
The domain was originally registered by Guadalupe Zambrano of Texas, back  in 2004, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems like a no-brainier to me, but I have seen at least 10 stories in the mainstream media about this today and no one reported it on domaining.com, so I&#8217;ll bite.</p>
<p>TheJayLenoShow.com was ordered transferred to Mr. Leno in a WIPO action today.</p>
<p><span id="KonaBody"><span>The domain was originally registered by Guadalupe Zambrano of Texas, back  in 2004, while Mr.Leno was firmly entrenched as the host of &#8220;The Tonight Show&#8221; and years before anyone knew (including Jay Leno)  that there would ever be a Jay Leno Show.</span></span></p>
<p><span id="KonaBody"><span>Still,  the domain was pointed to Zambrano’s real estate site, which certainly didn&#8217;t help his case.</span></span></p>
<p>The World Intellectual Property Organization decided that Leno does have common law trademark rights to his own name after working for 30 years in the public eye and found  Zambrano had no legitimate claim to the domain name and gave Zambrano 10 days to transfer the domain name to Leno.</p>
<p><span><span>Once again as we discussed the other day in relation to the mass registration of Michael Jackson domains, you have no right to use the name of a famous person be he dead or alive, or  host of the Tonight Show or his own.<br />
</span></span></p>
<p><span><span><br />
</span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thedomains.com/2009/07/02/thejaylenoshowcom-goes-to-the-rightful-owner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>BuyMyPoop.com: Learn What Makes A Valuable Domain &amp; What is Just a Bunch Of Crap</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2009/07/02/buymypoopcom-learn-what-makes-a-vaulable-domain-what-is-just-a-bunch-of-crap/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thedomains.com/2009/07/02/buymypoopcom-learn-what-makes-a-vaulable-domain-what-is-just-a-bunch-of-crap/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 15:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>MHB</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Domain Industry]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=4043</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With PPC declining you will be seeing more and more domains dropping as small and large domain holder shed dead weight from their portfolios.
Its a great time to pick up inventory, but there is a ton of stuff, which is just a waste of money.
Not that there isn&#8217;t great advice our there to decide what [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With PPC declining you will be seeing more and more domains dropping as small and large domain holder shed dead weight from their portfolios.</p>
<p>Its a great time to pick up inventory, but there is a ton of stuff, which is just a waste of money.</p>
<p>Not that there isn&#8217;t great advice our there to decide what makes a domain worth buying and holding</p>
<p>The &#8220;Domain King&#8221;,  <a href="http://www.ricksblog.com/my_weblog/2009/06/nouns-adjectives-and-verbs-are-what-domains-are-all-about.html">Rick Schwartz in a recent post</a> gave away the keys to the &#8220;candy&#8221; store when he told you what domains you should be looking for.</p>
<p>In a post over last weekend I gave <a href="http://www.thedomains.com/2009/06/27/our-first-maybe-last-namejetcom-picks/">you some great domains that were at Namejet.com</a>.  (CaliforniaForeclosures.com sold yesterday for under $4,500, talk about a bargain; today filth.com is on backorder at just over 1K).</p>
<p>There are great examples everywhere of failed domain strategies; money, time and opportunity wasted.</p>
<p>I found this domain at an expired auction going on at Godaddy.com, which says it all: <a href="https://auctions.godaddy.com/trpHome.aspx?t=16&amp;searchKeyword=_buymypoop.com">BuyMyPoop.com</a>.</p>
<p>Sure there are good even great buys out there, but there&#8217;s a ton of crap.</p>
<p>Take these gems that are dropping, please note they are all owned by the same person and have been registered for 9 years.  That&#8217;s 9 years of renewal fees on a bunch of worthless domains:</p>
<p>bestagencyaround.com<br />
bestairlinesaround.com<br />
bestauctionsaround.com<br />
bestautosaround.com<br />
bestbadgirlsaround.com<br />
bestbaseballaround.com<br />
bestbasketballaround.com<br />
bestbeeraround.com<br />
bestbetsaround.com<br />
bestbikesaround.com<br />
bestbingoaround.com<br />
bestbizaround.com<br />
bestbodyaround.com<br />
bestboxingaround.com<br />
bestbrainsaround.com<br />
bestbroadbandaround.com<br />
bestbucksaround.com<br />
bestcardsaround.com<br />
bestcasharound.com<br />
bestcellphonesaround.com<br />
bestchoicearound.com<br />
bestchristmasaround.com<br />
bestclothesaround.com<br />
bestcomputersaround.com<br />
bestdesignsaround.com<br />
bestdigitalaround.com<br />
bestdiscountsaround.com<br />
bestdollarsaround.com<br />
bestdowaround.com<br />
bestescrowaround.com<br />
bestescrowsaround.com<br />
besteverythingaround.com<br />
bestfashionsaround.com<br />
bestfilmaround.com<br />
bestfilmsaround.com<br />
bestflightsaround.com<br />
bestflowersaround.com<br />
bestfootballaround.com<br />
bestfunaround.com<br />
bestgiftsaround.com<br />
bestgirlsaround.com<br />
bestgodaround.com<br />
bestgolfaround.com<br />
besthobbiesaround.com<br />
besthockeyaround.com<br />
besthospitalsaround.com<br />
besthotelsaround.com<br />
bestideasaround.com<br />
bestkidsaround.com<br />
bestlandaround.com<br />
bestlimosaround.com<br />
bestlotteryaround.com<br />
bestlowpricesaround.com<br />
bestluckaround.com<br />
bestmachinesaround.com<br />
bestmallsaround.com<br />
bestmanaround.com<br />
bestmedicinearound.com<br />
bestmoneyaround.com<br />
bestmotelsaround.com<br />
bestmovesaround.com<br />
bestmoviesaround.com<br />
bestmusicaround.com<br />
bestnewsaround.com<br />
bestofficesaround.com<br />
bestpartyaround.com<br />
bestpetsaround.com<br />
bestratesaround.com<br />
bestrealestatearound.com<br />
bestrockaround.com<br />
bestsalearound.com<br />
bestsavingsaround.com<br />
bestsearcharound.com<br />
bestseatingaround.com<br />
bestsecurityaround.com<br />
bestservicearound.com<br />
bestshapearound.com<br />
bestshoppingaround.com<br />
bestshopsaround.com<br />
bestshowaround.com<br />
bestshowsaround.com<br />
bestsoundsaround.com<br />
bestspacearound.com<br />
bestsportsaround.com<br />
beststereosaround.com<br />
beststocksaround.com<br />
beststoresaround.com<br />
besttelevisionaround.com<br />
besttennisaround.com<br />
bestthingsaround.com<br />
bestticketsaround.com<br />
besttimearound.com<br />
besttitsaround.com<br />
besttravelaround.com<br />
besttvaround.com<br />
bestvacationsaround.com<br />
bestvaluesaround.com<br />
bestvetaround.com<br />
bestvetsaround.com<br />
bestvideoaround.com<br />
bestvideosaround.com<br />
bestvitaminsaround.com<br />
bestvotesaround.com<br />
bestwallstreetaround.com<br />
bestweatheraround.com<br />
bestwebsitearound.com<br />
bestwebsitesaround.com<br />
bestwheelsaround.com<br />
bestwholesalearound.com<br />
bestwinearound.com<br />
bestwinesaround.com<br />
bestwirelessaround.com<br />
bestwomanaround.com<br />
bestwrestlingaround.com</p>
<p>For 9 years someone paid renewal fees for these domains.  All the domains are at Stargate.  I don&#8217;t know if they paid $10 per name, or $35 per name but over 9 years that&#8217;s a lot of wasted money.  I see strings of domains every few days, all worthless.  All sucking up valuable resources.</p>
<p>Bottom line; people will be dumping a ton of inventory, but don&#8217;t buy other people&#8217;s poop.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thedomains.com/2009/07/02/buymypoopcom-learn-what-makes-a-vaulable-domain-what-is-just-a-bunch-of-crap/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Where Will It End: Now TradeMark Holders Are Suing Craigslist.Org For Free Posted Ads</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2009/07/02/now-trademark-holders-are-suing-craigs-list-for-posting-ads/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thedomains.com/2009/07/02/now-trademark-holders-are-suing-craigs-list-for-posting-ads/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 12:38:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>MHB</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Legal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=4017</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Trademark holders in a seemingly unending quest to expand their online rights, have now filed suit against Craigslist for trademark infringement based on ads posted by users.
The lawsuit was brought by Texas real estate company First Call Properties, (yes Texas again) which alleges that it began advertising on Craigslist&#8217;s in March and that a competing [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="articleText">Trademark holders in a seemingly unending quest to expand their online rights, have now filed suit against <a href="http://www.craigslist.org/about/sites">Craigslist</a> for trademark infringement based on ads posted by users.</span></p>
<p>The lawsuit was brought by Texas real estate company <a href="http://firstcallaustin.com/">First Call Properties</a>, (yes Texas again) which alleges that it began advertising on Craigslist&#8217;s in March and that a competing company,  AAA Apartment Locating (AAA),  began posting Craigslist ads that use the phrases &#8220;first call,&#8221; &#8220;call first,&#8221; and &#8220;call us first.&#8221;</p>
<p>First Call alleges that those ads were placed in a deliberate attempt to confuse consumers.</p>
<p>The company also asserts that Craigslist knew that AAA was using the First Call trademark and failed to stop the ads from appearing.</p>
<p>The lawsuit, in the  Federal Court for the southern district of Texas late last week named  Craigslist, AAA and two other individuals as defendants. Before the case was sent to federal court, a state court judge issued a preliminary order banning Craigslist and AAA from using &#8220;Call First,&#8221; &#8220;First Call Properties,&#8221; or &#8220;Call Us First,&#8221; or similar terms.</p>
<p>Now for me here is the interesting thing.</p>
<p>Unlike the suits filed against Google, on Craigslist, the posted ads are free.</p>
<p>Craigslist does not charge for placing the ads.</p>
<p>Craigslist does not make any more or less money on whether someone clicks on the ads</p>
<p>Now the trademark interest want to place on Craigslist a duty to know every unknown trademark in the world, and make Craigslist the enforcer of trademark laws.</p>
<p>Yet in this particular case the term &#8220;First Call&#8221; is very generic.</p>
<p>If you search &#8220;first call&#8221; on Google you get the following companies, all around the world that uses &#8220;First Call&#8221; and are all in the property management business:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.firstcallpropertyservices.com/about.htm">Firstcallpropertyservices.com</a>, located in NH</p>
<p><a href="http://www.1stcallpro.com/">1st Call Property Management</a> located In CA.</p>
<p><a href="http://fl.serviceslisted.com/466253-FirstCallPropertyMaintenance.htm">First Call Property Maintenance</a>, located in FL</p>
<p><a href="http://www.touchnottingham.com/business/list/bid/6230290">First Call Property Maintenance</a>, located in the UK</p>
<p><a href="http://1stcall.en.ecplaza.net/">1st Call Property Maintenance</a> Located in Spain</p>
<p>There are HUNDREDS maybe thousands more businesses using 1st call or first call in their name and they are all allowed to co-exist and operate, but when it comes to the net, it seems there can only be one.</p>
<p>If its not the domain their after, then its the exclusive use of the term in all internet advertising.</p>
<p>And what stupid judge would give someone an exclusive right to use the term &#8220;call us first&#8221; in advertising by issuing a injunction based off First Call which is generic in nature on its own.</p>
<p>Oh BTW &#8220;Call Us First&#8221; is also trademarked by another company in the background check business.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m telling you someone needs to address this problem.</p>
<p>Yes the true trademark infrining domains like &#8220;verison&#8221;, but we are at the point where every word, 2 letter combo, 3 letter combo and every phrase and saying that anyone has ever heard is trademarked, just in the US.</p>
<p>We need to bring a &#8220;famous&#8221; requirement back into online trademark law or we got bring problems coming at us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thedomains.com/2009/07/02/now-trademark-holders-are-suing-craigs-list-for-posting-ads/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CNET Asks: Do Domains Matter Anymore?</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2009/07/01/cnet-asks-do-domains-matter-anymore/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thedomains.com/2009/07/01/cnet-asks-do-domains-matter-anymore/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 00:41:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>MHB</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Domain Industry]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=4032</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[CNET.com published an article tonight entitled &#8220;Do URL&#8217;s matter Anymore?&#8221;
My favorite quote from the article is:
&#8220;Perhaps there are those generic words that people absent-mindedly type, perhaps just out of boredom. I don&#8217;t know, URLs like kitchen.com. Or music.com. But could this still be a significant number?
How many people really do bother to type URLs these [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CNET.com <a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-17852_3-10276727-71.html">published an article tonight entitled &#8220;</a><em><a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-17852_3-10276727-71.html">Do URL&#8217;s matter Anymore</a>?</em>&#8221;</p>
<p>My favorite quote from the article is:</p>
<p>&#8220;Perhaps there are those generic words that people absent-mindedly type, perhaps just out of boredom. I don&#8217;t know, URLs like kitchen.com. Or music.com. But could this still be a significant number?</p>
<p>How many people really do bother to type URLs these days?&#8221;"</p>
<p>The author <a href="http://www.cnet.com/profile/ChrisMatyszczyk/?tag=mncol;txt">ChrisMatyszczyk</a> expresses his believe is domains are old news and search is where its at.</p>
<p>Of course this article brought out all the domain haters and there are plenty of comments already including this one:</p>
<p>&#8220;&#8221;"I always thought it smarmy how people traded up url&#8217;s. Now we are entering an age where it is more important to know how to find information than to remember lots of info. Keywords are better than remembering web urls.&#8221;"&#8221;</p>
<p>However the most accurate comment in my opinion was:</p>
<p>&#8220;&#8221;Do people actually pay Chris Matyszczyk for nutty advice like this? If so, they&#8217;re wasting their corporate dollars.&#8221;"&#8221;</p>
<p>Go read the article.</p>
<p>Really an amazing lack of knowledge for someone who wrties about Tech.</p>
<p>On the other hand this is the same <a href="http://www.thedomains.com/2009/05/27/why-would-cnetcom-just-park-a-domain-like-radiocom/">CNET.com which owns the domain radio.com and has it going just to a parked page.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thedomains.com/2009/07/01/cnet-asks-do-domains-matter-anymore/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>UPDATE: NameJet&#8217;s .CM Landrush System Is Live: URL &amp; Pricing Info Here</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2009/07/01/update-namejets-cm-landrush-system-is-live-url-pricing-info-here/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thedomains.com/2009/07/01/update-namejets-cm-landrush-system-is-live-url-pricing-info-here/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 00:16:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>MHB</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Domain Auctions]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[ccTLD's]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=4029</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Namejet.com is now taking orders for .CM domains on its site.
To place your backorders here is the direct link to the NameJet site: click here
Pricing has also been announced.
To be clear Namejet.com is NOT charging to place a backorder, however any domain which is registered, you will be charged $350 upon successful registration, including 2 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Namejet.com is now taking orders for .CM domains on its site.</p>
<p>To place your backorders here is the direct link to the NameJet site: <a href="http://www.namejet.com/Pages/promos/preorder.aspx">click here</a></p>
<p>Pricing has also been announced.</p>
<p>To be clear Namejet.com is NOT charging to place a backorder, however any domain which is registered, you will be charged $350 upon successful registration, including 2 years of registration.</p>
<p>As we discussed in our <a href="http://www.thedomains.com/2009/07/01/namejetcom-to-be-exclusive-clearing-house-for-all-cm-domains/">earlier post today</a>, since Namejet.com is operating as the central clearing house for all .CM landrush domains you do not have to put orders in with multiple registrars attempting to get a particular .cm domain.  If you place an order with Namejet and it is the only order placed for that particular .cm domain with any registrar, you will get it for $350 with the 2 year registration.</p>
<p>If there is more than one backorder placed with Namejet, or any other registrar accepting .cm landrush applications, then those people will be placed into a private auction for that domain.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thedomains.com/2009/07/01/update-namejets-cm-landrush-system-is-live-url-pricing-info-here/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NameJet.com To Be Exclusive Clearing House For All .CM Domains</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2009/07/01/namejetcom-to-be-exclusive-clearing-house-for-all-cm-domains/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thedomains.com/2009/07/01/namejetcom-to-be-exclusive-clearing-house-for-all-cm-domains/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 18:31:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>MHB</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Domain Auctions]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[ccTLD's]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=4021</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[NameJet has reached an agreement with the .cm registry to be the exclusive auction provider for the .CM  upcoming Landrush.  (their site should be updated shortly)
NameJet will manage all the pre-order applications from the participating registrar partners through the registry.
NameJet customers will be able to submit their applications directly through NameJet for FREE (no application [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NameJet has reached an agreement with the <a href="http://register.cm">.cm registry</a> to be the exclusive auction provider for the <a href="http://register.cm">.CM  upcoming Landrush</a>.  (their site should be updated shortly)</p>
<p>NameJet will manage all the pre-order applications from the participating registrar partners through the registry.</p>
<p>NameJet customers will be able to submit their applications directly through NameJet for FREE (no application fees!).</p>
<p>With <a href="https://registrar.communigal.net/General/InfoPageCM.aspx">other registrars charging up to $300+</a> for each .cm domain in applications fees for the landrush (fees returned if domain is not obtained) this could save you a ton of dough.</p>
<p>Namejet.com will start taking pre-orders this afternoon and those will be accepted from July 15th through the 31st.</p>
<p>Auctions will then be scheduled for all domains where there was more than 1 pre-order application.</p>
<p>Rick Latona is also holding an online auction for some .cm domains that will NOT be available in the landrush.  Those domain will be sold only through the <a href="http://www.proxibid.com/ricklatona">Rick Latona auction which starts next week only July 7th</a>.</p>
<p>We will have more on that auction next week.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thedomains.com/2009/07/01/namejetcom-to-be-exclusive-clearing-house-for-all-cm-domains/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>No Record Setters, But We Close Over $100K In Sales In June</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2009/07/01/no-record-setters-but-we-close-over-100k-in-sales-in-june/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thedomains.com/2009/07/01/no-record-setters-but-we-close-over-100k-in-sales-in-june/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 12:30:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>MHB</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Domain Industry]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Domain Sales]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=4004</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We all love to hear about all those six and seven figure domain sales of one word category killer domains.
But there is a whole other market out there for end user buyers of two three and four word domains, and its a pretty busy marketplace.
We just finished up out best month of the year, in [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We all love to hear about all those six and seven figure domain sales of one word category killer domains.</p>
<p>But there is a whole other market out there for end user buyers of two three and four word domains, and its a pretty busy marketplace.</p>
<p>We just finished up out best month of the year, in June, selling 16 domains for a total of $110K in sales.</p>
<p>We also turned down well over 100 offers on some of our best domains.</p>
<p>With <a href="http://domainnamewire.com/2009/06/30/namemedia-sells-another-600k-in-domains/">BuyDomains.com rocking along</a> with $600K  in sales a week, there&#8217;s no doubt that there is tremendous demand for domains from end users for sites, blogs and e-mail.</p>
<p>It seems that with job losses, people are turning to the net to find income streams and need a good domains to start.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thedomains.com/2009/07/01/no-record-setters-but-we-close-over-100k-in-sales-in-june/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
