Its been six months since ICANN rolled out a major revision to its site at ICANN.org.
Now ICANN is asking you to tell them how you like their site.
“”The redesign of ICANN.ORG was launched on 27 February 2012. As we pass the six-month mark, we’d like to get your feedback. Is the redesigned site easier to use? Do you find the new features useful? Did we effectively streamline site navigation?
The new information architecture was designed to organize the resources that ICANN.ORG offers in a more logical arrangement. More than 38,000 pages and files were carefully examined and migrated into new locations following extensive consultation with the ICANN community, including:
Nearly 300 responses to the site survey conducted by The Revere Group
More than two dozen in-depth interviews with SO and AC members
A series of live briefings (with Q&A) across two ICANN public meetings
At least three briefings on process and progress to Board Directors (via the Public Participation Committee)
Two public webinars requesting input and concerns
“So now, you tell us! ”
“Were we successful?
“What do you like and dislike?
“Please take a few minutes to respond to this survey and let us know your thoughts. ”
“We’ll publish the results and review as we continuously improve the site.”
To take the poll click here
really boring and old design styles, hopefully good info underneath, however that organization turned in to a huge scam, was supposed to be lightly funded little office to help domain owners from fraud
The ICANNT.com design is better.
design from 2003-2006
@ DomainAddress4u
If the design looks like it’s 6+ years old, that’s probably because that’s when ICANN began the re-design process. ;+)
“was supposed to be lightly funded little office to help domain owners from fraud”
It was set up by lawyers who worked for the DOC for a short time. They went out of their way to circumvent pocesses such as the Freedom of Information Act so they could set a taxing authority so that the people paying the tax have no say in how the organization was run. They brought in lobbyists like Esther Dyson who were well-known DC brownnosers and others caught up in Internet pump and dump stock schemes to run the organinzations. Those lawyers are still around collecting legal fees for ICANN-related issues.
That was the plan and it has worked pretty well.