The Royal Bank Of Scotland, filed 20 separate UDRP’s cases today against 20 different domain holders.
Here are the domain names the UDRP’s were filed against:
online-rbs.com
rboscolanduk.com
rbs-groupsfinancial.com
rbs-london.com
rbs-my.com
rbs-onlinex.com
rbs-onnet.com
rbs-private.com
rbs-privatebank.com
rbs-uk.net
rbsbonline.com
rbscotl.com
rbsgrps.com
rbsindextrading.com
rbsonline-london.com
rbsplc-uk.com
rbsprivate.net
rbsukgroup.org
rbsukgrp.com
rbsexclusivecommercialfunding.info
In addition the National Westminster Bank filed 15 separate UDRP’s today
Here are the domains National Westminster Bank filed for:
nat-west-plc-online.com
natwest-investment.com
natwest-online.pro
natwest-web.com
natwestbanking.org
natwestbbnk.com
natwestbk-plc.com
natwestbk.com
natwestfinancegroup.net
ntwestbnk-online.com
uknatwestbanking.com
natwestcare.com
natwst.com
ntwsonline.com
ntwsonlines.com
I don’t blame them – those have obviously been reg’d for phishing rather than traffic.
Those domains are confusingly similar to the bank names, so udrp seems to be valid
It is the Trademark owners at the losing end. The registrant / infringer goes free, losing only the domain name. I hope ICANN could sponsor / set up a UDRP Centre, funded by ICANN. Not every company can afford the cost of filing a UDRP.