Skip to content
TheDomains
Menu
  • Home
  • Advertise
  • Contact
  • Awards
  • Privacy Policy
  • About Us
Menu

Apple Gets iTunes.net in UDRP

Posted on July 12, 2012
Share on Social Media
xfacebook
Follow us on Social Media
xfacebook

Apple was awarded the domain name,  iTunes.net and i-tune.com and today in a  UDRP decision.

The domain was owned under privacy and going to a parked page.

Last week Apple gained control of the domain iPad3.com after it filed a UDRP and the domain holder relinquished control of the domain.

In other UDRP decision, a one member panel rejected the claim of a ‘Steven L. Vensand, contends that he paid Respondent, HelpfulHal.com, to act as the intermediary between Complainant and the registrar, by registering the  domain name, newportbeachoptometry.com domain name and developing the resolving website.’

‘Complainant now would like the domain name registered in his name in order to continue doing business on the website. Complainant alleges that Complainant himself presently uses the disputed domain name in good faith.’

The panel found that the UDRP is not the proper mechanism to resolve what appears to be contractual disagreements between parties:

“The Panel finds that this is a business and/or contractual dispute between two companies that falls outside the scope of the UDRP.  Complainant’s Complaint should be dismissed without prejudice”

 

newportbeachoptometry.com

 

3 thoughts on “Apple Gets iTunes.net in UDRP”

  1. www.tl says:
    July 12, 2012 at 3:46 am

    Yes, trademark names can be taken from you very easily.

    But not only that. If you hold a portfolio of domains, and a TM
    holder takes a name from you (via UDRP), for infringement, then
    your position re: your OTHER names will also be weakened as a
    result.

    No UDRP verdict can, or will be, an isolated result…

  2. Web Wise Forum says:
    July 12, 2012 at 7:42 am

    The panel found that the UDRP is not the proper mechanism to resolve what appears to be contractual disagreements between parties:

    “The Panel finds that this is a business and/or contractual dispute between two companies that falls outside the scope of the UDRP. Complainant’s Complaint should be dismissed without prejudice”

    ———————————————-

    Glad to hear this! I’ve always wondered what could happen in this situation. I don’t think UDRP panels should be involved in anything further than trademark disputes. That’s what they are there for.

    They shouldn’t be going down the ICANN road of sticking their fingers in too many pies!

  3. @@@ DOT MAIL @@@ says:
    July 13, 2012 at 5:35 am

    too easy 🙂

Comments are closed.

Search posts

©2026 TheDomains | TheDomains.com Theme