With Renewal Time Approaching .Co Registry Is Set To Roll Out Dropping Domain Backorder Reservation System

2011 July 9
by Michael H. Berkens

I have gotten a lot of questions from readers on how .Co dropping domains are going to be handled.

.CO’s first year anniversary is coming up on July 19th (expiration date for 1st day registered .Co domains) and domain names will be coming up for their 1st renewals.

So I reached out to the .Co registry who gave me the run down for the process they will be implementing to handle .Co domains that are not renewed by their current owners, otherwise known as dropping .Co domain names.

.CO once again is going to be taking a whole new approach to handling of dropping domain names,  by allowing Back-Order Reservations for Domain Names Before they Drop.

You can read the details below, but under this system there will only be one backorder allowed, so first come first served, with no auctions.

My understanding is that when a .CO domain name expires, the Restore Grace Period (RGP) kicks in from the date of expiration for a period of  20 days before the domain is dropped.

During the first 15 days of the RGP domain names are Restorable by the registrant.

As with .com domains there will be a redemption fee.

Each registrar sets their own price for the redemption service just as they do to redeem a .com domain during the redemption period.

Based on what registrars charge to redeem a .com, I believe the fee may range anywhere from $90 – $200 per domain for redemption.

If the domain is not redeemed by the registrant during the 15 day period, then in the Last 5 days of the RGP the domain name becomes Non-Restorable.

During the last 5 days of this RGP period, anyone can make a reservation for a particular .CO domain that is about to drop through a .CO accredited registrar.

Once again the fee to back order a .Co dropping domain will be set by each registrar.

It’s going to be a one time fee plus the normal cost of registration.

Since the domain at this point will be in non-restorable status the person who back-ordered the domain will get it.

This Reservation fee is separate from the normal Registration cost and is not refundable given that if a Reservation is accepted and charged then it means the domain will be awarded.

The .CO Registry will launch this backorder process on Wednesday, August 3rd, which is 15 days after the 1st .Co domain expire.

Reservations (Backorders) will be made on a first-come, first-served basis, and only one backorder reservation will be allowed per domain.

If you plan to play in the .CO drop market, check with your .CO accredited registrar of choice from now to make sure they will be offering this option.

Since participation is optional for accredited registrars  you need to make sure your registrar is on that list!

I have also heard that some registrars might start this backorder process sooner, making an early order option available to their customers so the process depending on the registrar may begin before August 3rd.

Remember its 1 backorder per domain period,  not one backorder per registrar.

Of course if no one places a backorder on a .CO domain name in that 5 day period the domain name will drop and will be available to be registered by anyone on a first come, first serve basis for normal registrations fees any time after they drop.

For .CO investors, this is great news.

It means you can place back orders on the very valuable first round of .CO drops without domains going into drop auctions.

For the specific details about how the .CO back order process will work,  check with your registrar,  each registrar probably has its own unique policies, prices and processes to consider and we will keep you updated as more information is made available from registrars.

103 Responses leave one →
  1. 2011 July 9
    MHB permalink

    Snoopy

    Again .mobi is a bad example as the whole extension had one purpose, to make your existing website look good on your mobile device.

    It was a technology based extension and like all tech it becomes obsolete after some time, for mobi it wasn’t long because of the iphone.

    So in my life I have seen records (vinyl) , cassette tapes, 8 track, Cd’s, Mp3′s, iTunes

    what did you I do with each of these devices when the new tech came out, threw the old one away.

  2. 2011 July 9
    Snoopy permalink

    “Again .mobi is a bad example as the whole extension had one purpose, to make your existing website look good on your mobile device.”

    ///////////

    MHB,

    There is some reason why every new extension is “bad example”. .cc, .ws, .biz, .info, .tv, .us, .mobi. What extension would you like to use as an example?

  3. 2011 July 9
    LindaM permalink

    use .tv – theres one meaningless obsolete extension with no future if I ever saw one ;)

  4. 2011 July 9
    MHB permalink

    Snoopy

    You can use any example you want except for .mobi and .tel as they are technology based.

    Now as for the rest

    I never owned more than 10 .biz domains, don’t think I ever owned a .cc.

    I don’t think I have owned 10 .US, I pretty sure I have owned less than 5 .ws.

    So I’m not going to “defend” extensions I never owned or invested in.

    .info I have owned a few and made money with the ones I owned.

    The registry is extremely profitable.

    I think there are 7 million .info registered and the registry just increased their price to over $7 a year wholesale. So lets call it $50M gross

    a year

    We all should own such a loser

    ))):::

    .TV

    Pretty active market, get inquiries all the time on these, 3 this weekend alone.

    Brokered the sale of a 2 letter .tv in the mid five figures just a couple of months ago. (under NDA)

    I know of six figure .TV sales all under NDA.

    Personally I still like and am buying the extension

    There are plenty of end users, have no idea of why you consider the extension to be some type of failure.

  5. 2011 July 9
    LindaM permalink

    .tv no nothing to see here, move along everyone ;)

  6. 2011 July 9
    snoop loves .tv permalink

    How are those typo TM names in .tv doing?

  7. 2011 July 9

    @MHB One of the reasons that the bulk ownership is so comparatively low in .co ccTLD is due to the small number of registrars. With some of the previous TLD launches, some registrars were set up by investors to specifically target keyword domains. This resulted in a highly skewed profile for these TLDs that damaged natural growth and development in these TLDs. In having GoDaddy as the premium registrar, the .co registry made one of its smartest moves. Any new TLD targeting the North American market *has* to have GoDaddy onside if it is to gain market share. The high (compared to .com) registration price also reduced some of the speculative activity. Its limited registrars strategy seems to be a way of targeting key registrars in each target market rather than creating a free for all. There is an element of “bulk” (>50) ownership but it is nowhere near the industrial scale of .com or some of the more mature TLDs.

    The definition of what makes a TLD a success varies according to whomever you ask. Some domainers have emotionally invested in .co domains. Registries might consider usage to be the key metric. (The actively developed websites percentage for a new gTLD at .co’s pre-Landrush Anniversary stage would be between 9% and 20%.) Some less emotionally invested domainers might consider it to be the secondary market. For the general public, the marketing might be there but they will have to get used to using .co websites and thinking “.co” – that requires developed websites. A lot of the highly speculative domains will be dropped in the first or second Landrush Anniversary Junk Dump but nobody apart from the registrant and the PPC company will even notice as these domains are typically parked on the registrars’ PPC parking pages and drop without ever being developed.

  8. 2011 July 10

    “Allow me to let you in on a little secret and do you a favor. One of the powers that be at dotCO told me personally that they absolutely detest when this “Robert Cline idiot” continuously makes comments like: “… .CO which will be better than .com.”
    Got it, big guy?”

    They say what they think of me?
    Because I only tell TRUTH, sir.

    .co HOT HOT HOT!
    Soon to replace .GOV and .MIL!
    I get rid of air conditioning where Ilive and now cool apartment with .co domain name! But I still have fan. And ping pong table.

    Fan, ping pong table, .co domain name.
    THE FUTURE! HOT HOT!
    MUST ACT FAST! SOON, NO MORE! ALL GONE!

  9. 2011 July 10

    I almost lost

    AdvanceCloud.com

    I had 25 minutes to spare and got it reregistered.

    with all the hoopla surrounding Cloud.com

    AdvanceCloud.com

    has got to be worth something right ?

    What do you think ?

  10. 2011 July 10

    AdvanceCloud.com–yea it is worth 6 figures.

    Don’t forget to reg the dot co too.

    Check in the mail….

  11. 2011 July 10
    Snoopy permalink

    .info I have owned a few and made money with the ones I owned.

    The registry is extremely profitable.

    I think there are 7 million .info registered and the registry just increased their price to over $7 a year wholesale. So lets call it $50M gross

    a year

    We all should own such a loser

    ))):::

    .TV

    Pretty active market, get inquiries all the time on these, 3 this weekend alone.

    Brokered the sale of a 2 letter .tv in the mid five figures just a couple of months ago. (under NDA)

    I know of six figure .TV sales all under NDA.

    Personally I still like and am buying the extension

    There are plenty of end users, have no idea of why you consider the extension to be some type of failure.

    ////////////////////////

    MHB,

    With regarding to registries I will agree with you on that, there is a lot of smaller registries that should be making good money.

    Having said that that the registry is on the opposite side of the equation to the domainer, their revenue is our expense so for a registry to be making alot says nothing for how domineers are going.

    You cited .info, .tv is probably another good example; the registry has charged premium renewals sometimes into 5 figures annually (now largely scrapped except legacy names) and has had higher than normal renewals, great business for them while people will pay but not necessarily a good deal for domainers. The highest sale ever reported in the extension was business.tv for 100k and that was during the relaunch (the market has come off a lot since then in my view). Not saying there isn’t other high sales but there obviously isn’t many of them when 100k is the highest reported sale ever. Even with that one it was the registry making the money, not a domainer. Many of the other high sales are in the bracket as well.

    When you say you’ve got a few .info’s, if these are an example of a good investment how come someone with tens of thousands of domains would choose to only own a “few” .info’s? Personally I have owned maybe a dozen info’s and made maybe 2k profit after reg fees, but the ROI was poor compared to major extensions.

    To put this whole debate another way, do you know of anyone who has made substantial money in .info or .tv or .us speculation? Do you see people at conferences bragging about their .tv profits? The people who were big on .info for example in the early-mid 2000s seemed to have moved on or gone very quiet and good sales are rarely seen. .tv came back into vogue for a few months with the premium auctions but now is back where it was with dnjournal reporting maybe 1-2 sales a week. You can also see it in forum activity, go to the Namepros tv subforum or other dedicated .tv forums and see how dead interest in the extension has become over the last 12 months.

    One of most well known .tv speculators claimed he had 35k in sales in the last 6 months. That is always how it has been, the very best make an average living (ie a few people), the “Frank Schilling’s” of the alt extensions. Whilst the rest make very little or lose money.

    The point is not that nobody is making millions from them, the point it is is extremely rare for anyone to even make modest amounts from them, so why focus on an extension where it is an uphill battle to make money? I’m sure you aren’t focused on .tv or .info or .co, so is it wise for other people to be focused on trying to make money speculating on these when the upside is so limited?

    Personally I think.co is on the way down, I don’t think everyone is seeing it but I think it peaked interest wise probably 6 months ago and is headed the same way as .mobi for much the same reasons. If it does go that way though MHB, Rick Schwartz etc will still be having lobster bisque for dinner, that isn’t true about most speculating in this extension.

  12. 2011 July 10
    MHB permalink

    Snoopy

    Interesting points let me deal with them:

    “”Having said that that the registry is on the opposite side of the equation to the domainer, their revenue is our expense so for a registry to be making alot says nothing for how domineers are going.”"

    A registry is a different business than that of being a domainer.

    I think I have explained that many times especially in posts about RIGHT OF THE DOT.

    However having said that I don’t think its accurate to say a registry is on the opposite side of domainers.

    For example the .Co registry has thousands of reserved domains which of course at some point they will be looking to sell at premium prices, so like a domainer they will want to get as much as possible for those domains.

    A lot of the value of the registry is in these reserved domains and to that extent the registry has a vested interest in domainers succeeding.

    If domainer make money reselling domains it makes the registry owned reserved domains that much more valuable.

    Of course aftermarket sales also fuel more registrations.

    This is really what RIGHT OF THE DOT is about, increasing the profitability of the registry but not at the expense of domainers, make money with domainers.

    A win-win.

    To your next point:

    ” To put this whole debate another way, do you know of anyone who has made substantial money in .info or .tv or .us speculation? ”

    Yes I know a few people that are making a good living on .tv domains.

    “”One of most well known .tv speculators claimed he had 35k in sales in the last 6 months. That is always how it has been, the very best make an average living (ie a few people)”"

    “The point is not that nobody is making millions from them, the point it is is extremely rare for anyone to even make modest amounts from them, so why focus on an extension where it is an uphill battle to make money?”

    Well I don’t know how many people are making millions a year in domains in general, but is that the standard we should judge success by?

    I mean the economy is still horrible.

    Millions of people are out of work for years, lost their homes, their retirement savings, everything, while tens of millions more are living paycheck to paycheck

    I’m sure there are millions of people that would jump for joy to make an amount which you quite cavalierly dismiss as minor.

    “”why focus on an extension where it is an uphill battle to make money”"

    Well who said people should focus on .co or .tv or anything other than .com?

    I mean I think there are opportunities in these extensions so they should be on your radar.

    The one extension you haven’t mentioned is .Me.

    There is another extension where the registry has made a lot of money but so have domain investors.

    Have .Me domains sold in the six figures

    Absolutely.

    and higher

    So its another opportunity.

    A win-win

  13. 2011 July 10
    Alan permalink

    Looks like Robert Cline is off of his medication again.

  14. 2011 July 10
    domainer permalink

    Snoop is right some with .tv back in the crazy day.

    Its a whole new ball game. More liquidity in .tv marketplace imo. New players joining the party. Domainer to domainer sales have improved and end users are now establishing .tv as well.

    I’m making a small living in .tv. I also invest in .com. Great times to be in both imo.

    Snoop- we don’t have your portfolio value. We never will. You did it. Great. Congratulations. But I know many people making money in .tv I also fine it a bit bizzare how you have a portfolio that big and Uou spend so much time worrying about .tv. Are you that bored?

    Also snoops view of domaining in summary is this

    Let’s say this

    You sold a name for 1k profit
    You sold another name for 500 loss

    What’s the focus going be? The loss sell for 500 and say how about a domainer is. You don’t need to bat 1000 to be successful imo.

    I’m happy in .tv. Happy in .com. These 2 I’m focusing on.
    In regards to .co I’m not convinced but I own 4 of them. I also think its going be ugly with drops. Berkens may disagree. I respect berkens and read his words carefully.

    Good points on economic picture. Couldn’t agree more. It sucks. Its depressing. I am trying stay focused. Its hard too at times.

    One thing I learned from snoop was drop your shit and junk back in the crazy days.

  15. 2011 July 10
    domainer permalink

    I also have said this a long time

    Everyone is in different stages in domaining

    If domainer A made 30k profit in a year and learning each day, learning and trying achieve to The next phase

    If domainer B made 500k profit in a year and is happy

    If domainer C is new and showing big losses in x, xxx (most new comers do this and call it quits)

    Some people are part time, some are full time, some walk away and say fuck it.

    I did 6k sales past 7 weeks and been buying a lot. I spent x, xxx for my moms special birthday. I was happy and seeing close friends with my family and be there for my moms special day. I did this from domaining. One of my most rewarding things in domaining and my mom said thankyou. She also said keep up the hard work in domaining. I was almost in tears. Enjoying the memories, seeing people have fun. Drinking. Socializing. Was so rewarding experience for me and domaining. Most domainers would be laughing at this and big guys. But for me it meant something personally.

    So the point is this. Expectations. Put your egos aside. Drama. Learn. Keep focused. Different stages everyone is at. Go out and create. Make some calls. Email end users. Learn wordpress. Watch the drops. Whatever.

    Just my thoughts.

  16. 2011 July 10
    Internet Media permalink

    Don’t we all win if the world gets more involved in buying domains? IMO, diversity in extensions is a great thing, it helps create a market to buy and sell domains.

    There are many ways to prosperity…..

    -Peter

  17. 2011 July 10

    //I got the one I wanted for a client campaign. Knowing the holder had thousands and no funds to renew, I had a lawyer friend call from Columbia asking what his intentions were because they held the trademark knew they could win based on the case record but thought it would would save everyone time and aggravation if we just cut you a wire for $500 right now. The accent must have helped because without any research into the claims, he bit.//
    Assuming this is truly you:

    You’re proud of this tactic? At BEST it’s unethical or unscrupulous.

    We have words for methods like this and none of them are printable. We have words for people like you and none of them are printable here.

    Your name is mud. Karma is a bitch.

    You can’t even spell Colombia correctly.

  18. 2011 July 10

    Thanks for the information. I will keep up focusing on it.

  19. 2011 July 10
    Snoopy permalink

    “Its a whole new ball game. More liquidity in .tv marketplace imo. New players joining the party. Domainer to domainer sales have improved and end users are now establishing .tv as well.”

    ///////////////////

    I follow .tv sales pretty closely and in my view things are back where the were before the changes, it is back to a trickle of sales, usually a couple reported each week. Nothing like 2010 and everything like 2008-2009. Regarding “new players joining” it is easy to see from .tv discussion that this isn’t really the case, a lot of people are wondering what happened,

    eg,

    This thread is a good barometer,

    http://www.allthings.tv/forum/showthread.php?t=96507

    One year ago there was barely a negative word said for this “relaunched” extension, now look at what many long term .tv investors are saying (there is positive comments in that thread aswell but it is a clear change from a year ago), I’ve focued on the comments from people who have been around a while,

    //SpiderSpider//

    “ZERO END USER ACTIVITY.

    Was selling .tvs so much more when they had premiums!!

    Not at all happy for .tv future. And i am dropping good names too.

    of course – one big sale could change my feelings on .tv…..”

    //Ronnie//

    Domainer domainer market is not great, mostly because so many of the regular .tv buyers already own many great keyword.tv’s due to GR & LR buys which also meant they spent lots of cash so have little left to buy.
    Only bright spot for D2D sales is that many domainers who previously wouldn’t even consider buying .tv’s are NOW actively registering .tv’s & trying to buy on forum, sedo & via whois searches….Enduser activity still feels very strong, lots of offers, lots of new .tv’s being launched, many more companies now own their .tv….etc

    //JimboJimbo//

    [had some earlier more positive comments]

    .TV worries the crap out of me on several levels.

    Number ONE – it has NO firm footing and is still seen in some quarters (righty so at times) as the ‘flaky’ extension.

    .TV is the CouldHaveBeen extension that should be up there as a ‘contender’ but ended up getting mired in a world of premium, non-premium, registrar-locked, expensive, high renewal, ‘what happens beyond 2016?’ questions. It is ‘niche’ when it should be ‘NOW’.

    ……..

    On the coalface of .tv – down in the dirty and basic world of the domainer to domainer market – we can all see that the card called .tv has been marked.

    We see such a glut of high quality names that the prices have gone so far south they are now written in pesos rather than dollars. Some of the auctions have had shameful results – and for every ‘great time to buy’ piece of fluff, we can see that a lot of the d2d market is dying on its feet.

    In the past people could always get their money back on a name if they decided to sell at NP, or even SEDO. Now, your NP stuff will be ignored and your SEDO auction will be more than likely an auction of one!

    Yes, times have changed. There is a beautiful enduser market where companies are happy to spend at least $750 on a name and can go as high as the $60,000′s and $70,000s dependent on what the name is.

    There is also a ‘flat as a kipper’, all the domainers are dead, or have bailed out already, market. What we are left with are domainers who are making a flight to quality (perceived to be .COM) or selling up because of conditions in the real world, bailing out because their dreams failed, dealing in the short change end of the market, or lording it because they have sold high-end names and can easily afford the vastly reduced prices from distressed sellers.

    I personally am still playing, and there are times when I enjoy doing so. Only my accountant, the taxman, and my wife, know the real facts – and none have yet asked me to stop.

    ….although one of the three has asked me to do something more constructive with my life!

    ………

    One final point – if things were good then we would still be hearing on a regular basis from many of the old school .TVers about what’s happening. Now I don’t know the reason, but either they no longer trust the forums as a communications medium or they are no longer interested as they see no ‘action’ left in .tv other than from endusers.

    Where have the likes of Michael Bilyk, Antonis, DiscoverNow, Polin, SmashFactory, RL, MillersCrossing, Hulls and the dozens of others all disappeared to? If things were great, we’d know.

  20. 2011 July 10
    Snoopy permalink

    The one extension you haven’t mentioned is .Me.

    There is another extension where the registry has made a lot of money but so have domain investors.

    ////////////////

    It is an extension with minimal activity in my view, about half the level as .tv. Seems to be maybe 50 reported sales a year.

  21. 2011 July 10
    domainer permalink

    I think we a lot had decided to keep quiet.

    Others quit the game

    Others realize forums and debates are useless

    I’m not here to say what everyone is doing. To much time and energy focusing on others. Have enough time issues take care of my inventory and end user sales, drops and etc

    Plus this ties into your comment. Why announce much? You, taxman and wife know. So a few of us feel same way how you treat things.

    Snoop. Yes tons lost there shirt. I lost my shirt. You taught me a thing or 2. Your a big gun. Congrats. But for you to keep reflecting on old days is non sense. What matters is today. I took my hits. I paid my dues. I worked hard. I still have a lot to learn. Just like how you do.

    Either way back on topic. Sorry for off topics.

    Good Luck to everyone being a domainer.

  22. 2011 July 10
    Snoopy permalink

    “Plus this ties into your comment. Why announce much? You, taxman and wife know. So a few of us feel same way how you treat things.”

    ///////

    Note those are comments from other people, 3 people who are among the best known .tv speculators.

    “Snoop. Yes tons lost there shirt. I lost my shirt. You taught me a thing or 2. Your a big gun. Congrats. But for you to keep reflecting on old days is non sense. What matters is today. I took my hits. I paid my dues. I worked hard. I still have a lot to learn. Just like how you do.”

    ////////////////

    Is this Jeff Overman…sounds a bit like it?

    I guess it comes down to this, you lost your shirt the first time, now things are different, Robert Cline is saying much the same thing. He lost his shirt as well (in .com)…and now things are different (because he is on the fast track with .co).

    Hate to be the thread a-hole but lets be realistic here, if people have made bad domain mistakes in the past to the extent of “losing their shirts” what is the chance of their commentary being right now?

  23. 2011 July 10
    domainer permalink

    So snoop tell me this

    If you had 5k invest today and newbie how would you invest your hard earned money.

    Buy one .com in aftermarket? Find a name with meaningful direct navigation.

    Unfortunately we don’t have the bank role or portfolio you have.

  24. 2011 July 10
    Snoopy permalink

    So snoop tell me this

    If you had 5k invest today and newbie how would you invest your hard earned money.

    //////////////

    Jeff,

    If it were me I’d buy a handful of popular keyword .com’s, I’d probably focus on auction environments outside of the drops as well as trying to get names cheap from the whois. I would completely avoid new registrations, unpopular tlds, trend names or anything like that. Go for something with fairly certain value if you are starting out.

  25. 2011 July 10
    domainer permalink

    Ok. Thanks snoop.

    Have a good evening everyone. Cheers.

  26. 2011 July 11

    Snoopy.

    “Are you upset little friend? Have you been lying awake worrying? Well, don’t worry…I’m here. The flood waters will recede, the famine will end, the sun will shine tomorrow, and I will always be here to take care of you.”

    Charlie Brown

  27. 2011 July 11

    Stick to .com and .CO…these 2 extensions will be a lot better than many other thousands of new gTLDs…

    Because good generic gTLD such as .sport .business are the long tail word .extension…not sure these new long tail gTLDs will be anything better than the short .CO extension…

    Looks like .com and .CO are the best options for all current and future businesses…forget the other gTLDs…

  28. 2011 July 11

    I have made 5 figures on average every year for the last 5 years. About 70% of my portfolio are .tv domains.

    There is money to be made with .tv, you just need to know what your doing and not register everything in site just because the name was reged in other main extensions.

    Will names like coffee.tv, tea.tv, idea.tv, tablets.tv & Dessert.tv sell for 6 figures? Not sure, but I am willing to hold on to them and find out.

  29. 2011 July 11

    Snoop,

    Millerscrossing is SpiderSpider.

    With regard to your point above about people’s inactivity…

    The lack of active participation by certain people on the .tv forum, doesn’t say much about the extension or how those people feel about it. I personally know why a few of the people you listed are less active today than they were in the past (either b/c I speak or email w/them about .tv), and none of them are active today for any of the reasons you suggest.

    Just remember, not everybody has the disposable time to spend hours on the Internet being active on forums and blogs 24/7.

    On the one hand, I have to commend you on your persistence, and on the other hand, I have to wonder what motivates you to continue to spend your time campaigning against the extension.

  30. 2011 July 11
    Snoopy permalink

    The lack of active participation by certain people on the .tv forum, doesn’t say much about the extension or how those people feel about it

    ////////////////////

    As can be seen from the posts I quoted above even many veteran .tv investors are saying the opposite to this, your entitled to your views but clearly many people disagree,

    JimobJimbo’s final comments ring true in my view,

    “One final point – if things were good then we would still be hearing on a regular basis from many of the old school .TVers about what’s happening. Now I don’t know the reason, but either they no longer trust the forums as a communications medium or they are no longer interested as they see no ‘action’ left in .tv other than from endusers.”

  31. 2011 July 11

    You are naive if you believe everything you read that is public. It is certainly possible that the elite veterans like the one you mention have no reason to share how they really feel about an extension they continue to buy up. Instead, it is better for business to allow others to share negative views or even promote the negative view.

    My point is that you cannot draw a conclusion from statements made by people on a public forum.

  32. 2011 July 11

    @ “Snoopy”,

    I have done very well in .tv and just sold a LL.tv for 4000% ROI, it was a NDA and I paid about $1,000 for it, so you can figure out what it sold for. Want about 15 more examples of .tv in the last year. Overall, I am way ahead .tv. I been investing in .com since 1998, and .tv since 2000. I also own maybe the #1 .tv portfolio in the world, according to some. I buy top quality .tv names and flip them, I don’t buy junk. I am not here to brag, but to make a point, that you don’t know what your talking about!!!

    Thanks, Jim

  33. 2011 July 11

    Thanks for share! Cheers!

  34. 2011 July 15

    This is a useful information for us
    BTW,If someone wants drop his .co domains,Plz let me know,I’ll by some.

  35. 2011 July 27

    Can anyone help me with where I can RESERVE one of these dropping .co domains ?

    What registrars are participating ?

  36. 2011 August 3

    Today is August 3rd, so should .CO backorder requests be submitted to the registry by the end of the day?

  37. 2011 August 3

    @ Joe

    There is still some confusion about the entire process and the August 3rd deadline. Most of the .CO accredited registrars that are offering backorders say you can submit backorders STARTING today (DomainMonster has accepted them before this).

    I’m still not clear on how the premium reservation system works, and when the cut-off deadline is. DomainMonster claims to be using the premium reservation system for its .CO backorders, but when I spoke to 2 customer service reps on the phone this morning, neither of the knew what I was talking about.

  38. 2011 August 3

    Let’s wait for Michael’s reply, maybe he can shed some light on this.

  39. 2011 August 3

    Found this:

    assets.cointernet.co/COinternet/Registrars/CO-Reservation-System_080311_FNL3.pdf

  40. 2011 August 3
    MHB permalink

    Guys I published all the info I was given by the registry about the backorder system.

    Personally I haven’t tried to backorder one

    I will reach out to the .co folks & see if I can get Addional info or clarification

  41. 2011 August 3
    AbdulBasit Makrani permalink

    I tried backordering .co domains at DomainMonster and can see all the top keywords are already backordered and almost nothing is available to backorder with them !!

  42. 2011 August 3

    I got an email from name.com today, part of which said :
    “We are now offering .CO backorders through our normal search page. Starting August 3rd, you’ll also be able to place backorders on .CO domains for $84.99 through our Domain Nabber backorder service. ”
    Maybe that helps?

  43. 2011 August 3
    AbdulBasit Makrani permalink

    @ alltheco

    Thanks but I won’t place backorder with Name.com as they are having worst system in grabbing domains. DomainMonster had over 90% success rate in registering domains once the general availability started so I thought to backorder with them…

  44. 2011 August 3

    @Abdul

    Name.com also wants backorders to be paid upfront.

  45. 2011 August 3
    AbdulBasit Makrani permalink

    @ Joe

    Than I would never backorder with them even though I know they will surely grab it for me :D
    I cannot pay upfront a lot of money.

  46. 2011 August 3
    MHB permalink

    Guys remember one backorder per domain period so it doesn’t matter which registrar you use

    100% of the time the holder of the backorder will be awarded the domain

  47. 2011 August 3
    AbdulBasit Makrani permalink

    @ MHB

    Thanks for the clarification. That’s great.

  48. 2011 August 3

    I wasn;t pushing name.com, I just thought it would be helpful for people who didnt receive that email. FWIW Theyve always been great on my backorders (on other extensions) but like MHB says I dont think there is a ‘dropcatching’ aspect to the .co backorders.

  49. 2011 September 2

    It means you can place back orders on the very valuable first round of .CO drops without domains going into drop auctions.

    That is not the case… GoDaddy is making a fortune auctioning .CO domains, name.com, namejet, and snap are all auctioning domains if there’s more than one bidder.

Trackbacks & Pingbacks

  1. With Renewal Time Approaching .Co Registry Is Set To Roll Out … | Domain Names
  2. Anonymous
  3. GoDaddy Coupon Code: 30% Off .CO Domain Name Renewal - VisibleDot.Com
  4. Domisfera » Articulo » Backorders de dominios .co de Colombia

Leave a Reply

Note: You can use basic XHTML in your comments. Your email address will never be published.

Subscribe to this comment feed via RSS

Please copy the string D4MlRI to the field below: