Vail.Co Sells For $15K as The .Co Land Rush Auctions End With Another $200K + In Sales

2010 September 20
by Michael H. Berkens

Another great Geo domain, Vail.co topped the.Co Land Rush Auction results reported by the .Co registry today (we already reported on Ban.co auction but the registry didn’t report it until today)

In all other $200K+ in Land Rush domain name auction results were reported

The .Co land rush auctions are coming to a close and just a handful of auctions are still ongoing, so this appears to be the last report we will be getting of Land Rush auction results.

I expect in the near term one of the auction houses will hold a auction of .Co owned or registry owned domains, but so far nothing has been announced.

Here are the results:

ban.co $24,500
vail.co $15,550
blackfriday.co $11,611
fish.co $11,000
flip.co $10,600
pure.co $7,886
cloudcomputing.co $7,100
Gogreen.co $6,520
soso.co $6,400
leads.co $5,400
relocation.co $5,100
allah.co $5,100
vitamins.co $4,915
chris.co $4,800
compare.co $4,650
philadelphia.co $4,600
marketresearch.co $4,100
homesforsale.co $4,100
logos.co $4,100
1688.co $4,099
tutor.co $4,011
sss.co $3,900
develop.co $3,766
puppies.co $3,600
lending.co $3,550
ready.co $3,470
iva.co $3,277
burger.co $3,101
whiskey.co $3,100
gis.co $3,100
lawfirm.co $2,880
uae.co $2,800
cerveza.co $2,800
bookies.co $2,551
bbb.co $2,550
how.co $2,350
psychometrics.co $2,125
happy.co $2,111
trains.co $2,100
69 Responses leave one →
  1. 2010 September 22
    Frank A permalink

    @(matt)
    In my thoughts it seems like stumble.co is your greatest domain with the most worth?

    .CO just keeps growing and growing. A year from now it will be the ultimate factor of .CO

  2. 2010 September 22

    “Notice those domains are mostly in english. These sales happened in 2007-2008. I didnt look very hard to find these. They set a precedence for the extension as NOT be worthless. As you can tell, the sales are pretty decent for an extension that was ONLY limited to Colombia at the time of these sales. ”

    These sales have been mentioned before. The extension was a typo on NameBio

    If you look at the whois many of these are available to reg in .CO now, and going through at least 10 I did not find one with a creation date before 2010.

    Brad

  3. 2010 September 22
    Gazzip permalink

    “Just an FYI for those who continue to insinuate that .CO will amount to NOTHING.
    It has already set a precedence back when it was a lowly ccTLD (prior to being a global reaching extension)”

    “These sales happened in 2007-2008. I didnt look very hard to find these. They set a precedence for the extension as NOT be worthless. As you can tell, the sales are pretty decent for an extension that was ONLY limited to Colombia at the time of these sales.”
    ———–
    FYI – I hate to burst your wonderful .co bubble but most those sales were for .CO.UK domains and NOT .co, they probably all are but I really can’t be bothered checking them all, maybe you want to ?

    I think you can get the picture from the info below, that’s of course unless dnjournal is completely wrong but I highly doubt that. (especially looking at those prices)

    TheCube.co.uk – $40,919 in 2006 according to dnjournal

    http://www.dnjournal.com/archive/domainsales/2006/ytd-sales-charts-2006.htm

    TheCube .co is a 2010 reg

    ———————————————————————-

    Hollywood.co.uk $17,438 3/28/2006 Sedo

    http://www.dnjournal.com/archive/domainsales/2006/Q1-expanded.htm

    Hollywood.co – 2010 reg

    ———————————————————————-

    WarnerBreak.co.uk $3,000 sold at Sedo

    http://www.dnjournal.com/archive/domainsales/2006/domainsales05_23_06.htm

    WarnerBreak.co – available

    —————————————————-

    14.Mortgage-Index.co.uk £1,250 = $2,446 Sedo

    http://www.dnjournal.com/archive/domainsales/2006/domainsales1_2_07.htm

    mortgage-index.co – Available

    —————————————————–

    #3 StudentJob.co.uk at €5,000

    http://www.dnjournal.com/archive/domainsales/2006/domainsales1_2_07.htm

    studentjob.co – 2010 reg

    ————————————————————

    #8 ReservationRewards.co.uk ($3,253)

    http://www.dnjournal.com/archive/domainsales/2006/domainsales12_19_06.htm

    ReservationRewards.co – 2010 reg

    ——————————————————————

    8. EmploymentLaw.co.uk €2,400 = $3,167 Sedo

    http://www.dnjournal.com/archive/domainsales/2006/domainsales12_26_06.htm

    employmentlaw.CO – 2010 reg

    ———————————————————————–

    Lyrics.co.uk $80,000 2/21/2006 Pvt Sale

    http://www.dnjournal.com/archive/domainsales/2006/Q1-expanded.htm

    Lyrics.co – 2010 reg

    ——————

    Now I don’t know if that list was a mistake or deliberately posted to get people to reg the equivalent domains in .co but it looks like thats exactly what it did do for the most part, coincidence?? who knows :)

    Good Luck

  4. 2010 September 23
    gazzip permalink

    “These sales happened in 2007-2008. I didnt look very hard to find these. They set a precedence for the extension as NOT be worthless. As you can tell, the sales are pretty decent for an extension that was ONLY limited to Colombia at the time of these sales.”

    They are all .CO.UK sales and NOT .CO sales so it proves nothing, look them up on dnjournal.

    Many of these above (in .CO) were registered AFTER this list was posted on the forums.

    I posted links to some of them here but they did’nt get approved.
    (see if this post does?)

  5. 2010 September 23
    Slate permalink

    “”FYI – I hate to burst your wonderful .co bubble but most those sales were for .CO.UK domains and NOT .co, they probably all are but I really can’t be bothered checking them all, maybe you want to ?

    I think you can get the picture from the info below, that’s of course unless dnjournal is completely wrong but I highly doubt that. (especially looking at those prices)”"

    @Gazzip
    Thank you, but I got my info from NameBio (Snapnames).
    If you look up the same dates under .CO.UK you wont see those names.

    So now we need to find another source. We cant have 2 conflicting information out there. It doesn’t help anyone.

    Cheers

  6. 2010 September 23
    Gazzip permalink

    “We cant have 2 conflicting information out there. It doesn’t help anyone. ”

    Very True Slate but mistakes can & do happen, you can’t beleive everything you read on the Internet :)

    Dnjournal is the correct one. (as usual)

    These are .co.uk sales – not .co sales

  7. 2010 September 24
    Slate permalink

    I know ever one here LOVEs Godaddy…LOL
    But has anyone noticed that when you are looking at available domains to buy, off to the right side (where it says .COM “Most Popular”, .INFO “Free w/.COM”…ect), next to .CO it says “Premier Choice!” (copy and pasted from their site).

    I just thought it was cute. I think they are trying to push the .CO. You will also notice that its listed in the 3rd spot above .ORG and .NET.

    I just wanted to see if anyone else noticed that and hear your thoughts.

    Cheers

  8. 2010 October 1
    Aniol permalink

    That looks like the first big test for REAL .co domain sales:

    T.R.A.F.F.I.C. Miami Initial Auction Inventory
    http://www.ricklatona.com/2010/09/27/t-r-a-f-f-i-c-miami-initial-auction-inventory-submissions-still-open/

    More excellent .co names. Some of the best Spanish language names you could have.
    http://www.ricklatona.com/2010/10/01/more-excellent-co-names-some-of-the-best-spanish-language-names-you-could-have/

  9. 2010 October 4

    The data for those .co.uk sales was put in NameBio incorrectly as .co. That’s why you see no .co.uk sales of the aforementioned domains in NameBio.

    But really it’s not worth even presenting it as a “precedent”. The .co launch was super successful and precedents have now been set. So onward…

  10. 2010 October 12
    BrianWick permalink

    http://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/search/text.jsp?case=DCO2010-0002
    linode.co
    > Transfer

    Is this the first “.co” case from the armchair kangaroos

  11. 2010 October 14

    This, along with Denver.co, makes me wonder what LasVegas.co will go for at Traffic. Care to venture a guess, MHB?

  12. 2010 October 14
    MHB permalink

    Em

    Lasvegas.co I personally don’t like it in the $20K+ reserve range

  13. 2010 October 14

    Vail.co and Denver.co have one thing in common- they both use .CO as hacks for Colorado.

    LasVegas is still a killer keyword, but not as relevant of a GEO as the above two.

    Brad

  14. 2010 October 15
    BrianWick permalink

    Personally – given the demand for .co – I feel it will go for the 20k in auction – although its commercial billboard value is worth right at ZERO.

  15. 2010 October 15
    MHB permalink

    Brian

    Except the reserve is stated as $20K-$100K so $20K may very well not buy the domain and it might be a pass

  16. 2010 October 15
    BrianWick permalink

    as “todaro” mentioned in another thread – where some folks believe there is an enormous demand for the non.com Internet space, like “.co” – the real deamand is for these (sell them what they want) registries to fill enormous space between the ears of these bottom floor “gold” miners.

    That said I hope some sucker puts 50 or 100 into LasVegas.com – oops LasVegas.cc – oops again LasVegas.cm – oops again I mean LasVegas.co.

  17. 2010 October 15

    Brian,

    Hey zero to zero means no potential and therefore no business. Heck, lets just call it quits today and be done with it…LOL. That would be like saying we should stop building houses because all the best houses have been built. Yeah right… if someone had the guts to start a new registry, he or she would be playing a different tune, I’m sure. But like any other start-up entrepreneur, first you have to have the guts. No risk, no reward. Plain and simple. .co is not that bad of a risk.

    The typo thing is off the barbecue now, it’s done and a yawner at that.

  18. 2010 October 15

    I agree with MHB. LasVegas.co will likely be a pass because of the reserve. But who can say for sure?

Trackbacks & Pingbacks

  1. Aspen, Vail highly sought in domain name game | 1EZDomain

Leave a Reply

Note: You can use basic XHTML in your comments. Your email address will never be published.

Subscribe to this comment feed via RSS

Please copy the string IFRAO3 to the field below: