After 5 years French Court Finds Registrar EuroDNS & Registry AFNIC Not Responsible For TM Infringing Domain Registrations

Back in 2008, 13 French companies filed suit against the registrar EuroDNS and the French Association for Internet Naming in Cooperation (hereinafter: AFNIC), which runs the .Fr ccTLD

The suit alleged that EuroDNS and AFNIC were at fault for allowing third parties to register 129 domain names infringing on their respective Trademarks.

They sued EuroDNS for € 2.9 million and demanded that AFNIC be ordered to  freeze or block of the domain names.

The Court of Appeal upheld the ruling of the lower court which held the neither the registrar EuroDNS or the  Registry AFNIC had any liability.

“Registrars are neutral in disputes between domain names registrants and third parties claiming a violation of their rights and furthermore held that EuroDNS, as a registrar, shall not be liable for the registrations of its customers.”

The plaintiff were basically asking the Court to impose obligations on registrars that would have required them to act as “gatekeepers” for trademark holders for all the extensions they offer.

The Court of Appeal denied these demands and ruled that registrars have no obligation to control of the domain names their customers register with them, nor are registrars obliged to setup additional filtering measures other than those put in place by the registry.

“Those exact same demands were made against a US registrar in a famous case held before a Texas court … back in 2001.” reminds Luc Seufer, Chief Legal Officer at EuroDNS. “Though our industry is still facing the same issues a decade later, several means to settle them via extra-judiciary routes such as the UDRP or SYRELI for .FR registrations have been successfully setup. As underlined by the Court in its decision, the appellants were misguided when they elected not to recourse to those and decided to act against EuroDNS and the French Registry.”

“According to the Court of Appeal obliging registrars to screen their customer’s registrations would impose disproportionate and very costly efforts on them in regard to the aim of such obligation.”

“Furthermore and on top of the technical burden that would be created, the decision also highlights the fact that just like Trademark registration offices, registrars have no legal means to decide as to the legitimacy of a registration.”

“This decision upholds the position we have always maintained. As a registrar we are bound to remain neutral in any dispute between our customers and a third party.“ said Seufer.

“However neutrality should not be confused with passivity. As the Court acknowledges, although we are in no position to prejudge upon the rights between two parties on a domain name, EuroDNS always act diligently when notified of an issue. Every complaint my department receives is swiftly communicated to the relevant customer along with a very clear reminder of our terms of service regarding third parties’ registered rights.”

By this ruling the Court of Appeal actually confirmed EuroDNS’ advice to its own customers to appeal to the applicable alternative dispute resolution processes when they seek to recover domain names for which they believe to hold exclusive rights on, and where no such process is available, to act against the registrant and not the registrar or registry.

The suit was brought back in December 2008.

Here are a few of the more well know plaintiffs:

Auchan Group

Air France


Lancôme Parfums

Renault SAS

Voyageurs du Monde SA

France Télévisions SA (representing the rights of France 2, France 3, France )

Some of the domain names at issue were:



  1. says

    A registrar should not be responsible for their customers actions …. unless they conspire with them to register infringing domains for the purposes of hiding the true registrant. According to internet postings the old EuroDNS sales manager set up QuinV and claimed in a UDRP QuinV is not professional domainers yet says they have over 12,000 domains registered.

    Also, don’t the people operating EuroDNS also operate as well as porn sites? Weren’t they the same people involved in filing that bogus DomainTools lawsuit after a complaint was made over selling historical whois data w/o permission?

    Alkso, don’t they advertise on most domainer blogs so most of the ass-kissers won’t bring any of this stuff up in stories like this?

Comment Policy: welcomes reader comments. Please follow these simple rules:

  • Stay on topic
  • Refrain from personal attacks
  • Avoid profanity
  • Links should be related to the topic of the post
  • No spamming. Listing domains, products, or services will get the comment deleted

We reserve the right to remove comments if we deem it necessary.

Join the Discussion