Consumer Watchdog Tell Senator Rockefeller To Block Google & Amazon’s New gTLD Applications

Consumer Watchdog today urged Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D –W.VA) to block attempts by Google and Amazon to acquire the new gTLD’s they applied for through Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN).

In a letter to Sen. Rockefeller, chairman of the Senate Commerce, Science and Transportation Committee, John M. Simpson, Consumer Watchdog’s Privacy Project director wrote:

“If these applications are granted, large parts of the Internet would be privatized. ”

“It is one thing to own a domain associated with your brand, but it is a huge problem to take control of generic strings. ”

“Both Google and Amazon are already dominant players on the Internet. ”

“Allowing them further control by buying generic domain strings would threaten the free and open Internet that consumers rely upon.”

“We believe the plans by Google and Amazon are extremely problematic and call on you to help prevent their implementation. It is one thing to use a Top Level Domain name that is associated with your brand name.  In Google’s case that might be .Google or .YouTube or .Android.  Similarly it makes make sense for Amazon to acquire .Amazon or .Kindle.  But, that is not what is happening,” wrote Simpson.”Consumer Watchdog noted that Google has ponied up $18.7 million to buy 101 domain strings like .eat, .buy, .book, .free, .web, and .family. Amazon is close behind the Internet giant applying for 76 domain strings including such names as .free, .like, .game, and .shop.”

“Consumer Watchdog urges you to do all that you can to thwart these outrageous efforts and ensure that the Internet continues its vibrant growth while serving the interests of all of its users,” the letter concluded.

“Rockefeller has urged the organization to move ahead with the plan “slowly and cautiously,” warning:  “The potential for fraud, consumer confusion and cybersquatting is massive and argues for a phased-in implementation.”

Comments

  1. says

    from the WSJ interview:

    ““”WSJ: You have had a lot of complaints and objections. Was this expected, and how are you dealing with it?”

    “AA: Let me first separate comments from objections. There have been zero objections so far. There have been over 6,000 comments.

    “To apply for an objection you have to have standing, you have to pay a fee, and it goes to a dispute resolution service. Either the applicant is awarded the domain or the objection is upheld and the application stops. This is binding.”

    ***********
    What does AA mean by saying:
    “you have to have standing…”

    To object you have to pay a fee…??? what???….anybody knows the amount of such a fee?

    Is there an appointed “Ombudsman”?

    I smell more delays…

    AA: Mr Akram Atallah

Comment Policy:

TheDomains.com welcomes reader comments. Please follow these simple rules:

  • Stay on topic
  • Refrain from personal attacks
  • Avoid profanity
  • Links should be related to the topic of the post
  • No spamming. Listing domains, products, or services will get the comment deleted

To report spelling errors or other mistakes, please email raymond@thedomains.com instead of adding a comment. We thank you for the heads up, but want to keep the discussion on topic.

We reserve the right to remove comments if we deem it necessary.

Join the Discussion