Verizon Acquires iPhone Domains Ahead of Early 2011 Launch: Did Verizon Actually Buy The Domains?

2011 January 2
by Michael H. Berkens

According to the blog, 9to5mac.com, Verizon just bought or had transferred to it the domain names iPhoneonVerizon.com and iPhoneforVerizon.com.

Verizon has long been rumored to be getting its own version of the iPhone in early 2011, which since launch has only been available in the US at AT&T.

According to the 9to5 blog, both domains were previously registered at GoDaddy by a Jack Benton.  The domains are currently registered at Mark Monitor.

The question now becomes did Verizon how has been as aggressive as any trademark holder bring lawsuits and UDRP’s against domain holders, actually buy the domains from the domain holder?

I did not find a UDRP filed on either of these domains, nor could I find a federal lawsuit that was filed over them.

Moreover the same person that owned this domain owns the domains  iPhoneonSprint.com and iPhoneonATT.com.

If the domain holder was forced though a C & D to give up the Verizon names, why would he still be hanging on to the other hot potato domains for Sprint and ATT?

On the other hand which trademark holder has better rights to the domains that Verizon got, Verizon or Apple?

If Verizon still doesn’t have a formal agreement to sell the iPhone yet, isn’t Verizon infringing on Apple’s trademark by owning the domains?

Finally the domains are still pointed to the  site run by the former owner instead of to Verizon.

5 Responses leave one →
  1. 2011 January 2

    >> On the other hand which trademark holder
    has better rights to the domains that Verizon got, Verizon or
    Apple? Yeah. That’s a good question. Kinda reminds me of this
    similar situation where SalesForce.COM tried to get a bunch of
    domains that had 2 trademarks in them:
    http://domainnamewire.com/2009/04/28/salesforcecom-registers-21-trademarked-domain-names/

  2. 2011 January 2

    Verizon frequently sends notices to domain owners asking them to hand domains over. That’s probably what happened here.

  3. 2011 January 2

    Maybe they’ve wised up to the fact that it’s cheaper and faster to buy than fight. Someone got there first- to avoid this in the future- a company like this needs more brainpower in marketing than legal.

  4. 2011 January 2

    btw that’s advice Howard gave me that I should have followed but didn’t years back– so I understand the value prop.

  5. 2011 January 3
    Tenacious Domain permalink

    I also noticed that tmobileiphone.com is owned by Deutsche Telekom, parent company of T-mobile.

Leave a Reply

Note: You can use basic XHTML in your comments. Your email address will never be published.

Subscribe to this comment feed via RSS

Please copy the string kgvqon to the field below: