<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: NeuStar&#8217;s Alternative DNS Service Is Blocking Parked Domains</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thedomains.com/2010/06/16/neustars-alternative-dns-service-is-blocking-parked-pages/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2010/06/16/neustars-alternative-dns-service-is-blocking-parked-pages/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 20:38:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: TLD News - News from world of domains</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2010/06/16/neustars-alternative-dns-service-is-blocking-parked-pages/comment-page-2/#comment-50487</link>
		<dc:creator>TLD News - News from world of domains</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2010 19:53:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=9626#comment-50487</guid>
		<description>[...] blocking all internet ads is problematic (a nod to legitimate advertising and parking), which is distinctly different from some services such as DNS [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] blocking all internet ads is problematic (a nod to legitimate advertising and parking), which is distinctly different from some services such as DNS [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Domain Name Wire &#187; News &#187; Microsoft Gets Patent for &#8220;Cybersquatter Patrol&#8221; - The Domain Industry's News Source</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2010/06/16/neustars-alternative-dns-service-is-blocking-parked-pages/comment-page-2/#comment-50457</link>
		<dc:creator>Domain Name Wire &#187; News &#187; Microsoft Gets Patent for &#8220;Cybersquatter Patrol&#8221; - The Domain Industry's News Source</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2010 13:48:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=9626#comment-50457</guid>
		<description>[...] blocking all internet ads is problematic (a nod to legitimate advertising and parking), which is distinctly different from some services such as DNS [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] blocking all internet ads is problematic (a nod to legitimate advertising and parking), which is distinctly different from some services such as DNS [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Roysdon</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2010/06/16/neustars-alternative-dns-service-is-blocking-parked-pages/comment-page-2/#comment-49306</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Roysdon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jul 2010 11:55:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=9626#comment-49306</guid>
		<description>The good news is that DNSSEC should stop all of this nonsense.  You won&#039;t be able to serve ads for NX or domains that matter.  More DNSSEC tools need to make it down to the clients as well, so end-users can see when this sort of thing is occuring (But also to allow bypassing DNSSEC blocking sites when it&#039;s just that DNSSEC is broken somehow).  Of course, this is no better in the end than users clicking &quot;OK&quot; or whatever will get rid of the warning fastest, as with SSL cert warnings and anything else, but at least the end-user is presented with information.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The good news is that DNSSEC should stop all of this nonsense.  You won&#8217;t be able to serve ads for NX or domains that matter.  More DNSSEC tools need to make it down to the clients as well, so end-users can see when this sort of thing is occuring (But also to allow bypassing DNSSEC blocking sites when it&#8217;s just that DNSSEC is broken somehow).  Of course, this is no better in the end than users clicking &#8220;OK&#8221; or whatever will get rid of the warning fastest, as with SSL cert warnings and anything else, but at least the end-user is presented with information.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ahyes</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2010/06/16/neustars-alternative-dns-service-is-blocking-parked-pages/comment-page-1/#comment-48158</link>
		<dc:creator>ahyes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jun 2010 21:58:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=9626#comment-48158</guid>
		<description>neustar should just replace &quot;due to excessive advertising&quot; with the truth.  neustar wants to collect parking revenue (through partnership with dnsadvantage) without having to purchase the name, i.e. bear the cost of ownership i.e. they want the reward without without the risk.

if you are still in doubt that &quot;due to excessive advertising&quot; is a sham, consider this: does neustar block the site called milliondollarhomepage.com?
it&#039;s 100% ads.  no content.  it earned the owner &gt;$1MM in ad income.  

there are easy ways to avoid PPC ads as an end-user.  it&#039;s simply a matter of learning.  if one truly wants to curb advertising, then educating users is the proper path.  

neustar is not helping users in that regard... they are still directing users to PPC, and taking a cut. perhaps we all need to simply admit that ads are (or are becoming) the most valued part of the web.  and no one is about to help users learn how to avoid ads, and view only content.  why is that?  just be honest.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>neustar should just replace &#8220;due to excessive advertising&#8221; with the truth.  neustar wants to collect parking revenue (through partnership with dnsadvantage) without having to purchase the name, i.e. bear the cost of ownership i.e. they want the reward without without the risk.</p>
<p>if you are still in doubt that &#8220;due to excessive advertising&#8221; is a sham, consider this: does neustar block the site called milliondollarhomepage.com?<br />
it&#8217;s 100% ads.  no content.  it earned the owner &gt;$1MM in ad income.  </p>
<p>there are easy ways to avoid PPC ads as an end-user.  it&#8217;s simply a matter of learning.  if one truly wants to curb advertising, then educating users is the proper path.  </p>
<p>neustar is not helping users in that regard&#8230; they are still directing users to PPC, and taking a cut. perhaps we all need to simply admit that ads are (or are becoming) the most valued part of the web.  and no one is about to help users learn how to avoid ads, and view only content.  why is that?  just be honest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Louise</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2010/06/16/neustars-alternative-dns-service-is-blocking-parked-pages/comment-page-1/#comment-47956</link>
		<dc:creator>Louise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jun 2010 03:28:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=9626#comment-47956</guid>
		<description>This is a great article. There is also the effect of service providers, like Comcast and AT&amp;T, favoring sites with better speed, that they have deals and arrangements with.  The FCC was ruled against, that it has the jurisdiction to regulate broadband, so it is trying to review its powers as to broadband internet to protect net neutrality, instead of service providers interfering with subscriber&#039;s web traffic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a great article. There is also the effect of service providers, like Comcast and AT&amp;T, favoring sites with better speed, that they have deals and arrangements with.  The FCC was ruled against, that it has the jurisdiction to regulate broadband, so it is trying to review its powers as to broadband internet to protect net neutrality, instead of service providers interfering with subscriber&#8217;s web traffic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Louise</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2010/06/16/neustars-alternative-dns-service-is-blocking-parked-pages/comment-page-1/#comment-47872</link>
		<dc:creator>Louise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jun 2010 18:19:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=9626#comment-47872</guid>
		<description>On the topic of the benefits of Neustar:

1) Neustar leads in security. Verisign is &lt;a HREF=&quot;http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9151739/Update_Verisign_fails_to_take_action_against_malicious_sites_researcher_says?taxonomyId=17&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;lax on security&lt;/A&gt;

2) With ICANN&#039;s passing last year of Verisign&#039;s process of Bulk Transfer After Partial Portfolio Acquisition (BTAPPA) of dot com and dot net - a system Neustar implemented successfully in 2006 - it looks like massive takeover of unresolved dot coms and dot nets looming. Therefore dot us and dot biz may be good investment/development alternative.  See rant, linked to above.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On the topic of the benefits of Neustar:</p>
<p>1) Neustar leads in security. Verisign is <a HREF="http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9151739/Update_Verisign_fails_to_take_action_against_malicious_sites_researcher_says?taxonomyId=17" rel="nofollow">lax on security</a></p>
<p>2) With ICANN&#8217;s passing last year of Verisign&#8217;s process of Bulk Transfer After Partial Portfolio Acquisition (BTAPPA) of dot com and dot net &#8211; a system Neustar implemented successfully in 2006 &#8211; it looks like massive takeover of unresolved dot coms and dot nets looming. Therefore dot us and dot biz may be good investment/development alternative.  See rant, linked to above.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MHB</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2010/06/16/neustars-alternative-dns-service-is-blocking-parked-pages/comment-page-1/#comment-47858</link>
		<dc:creator>MHB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jun 2010 16:24:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=9626#comment-47858</guid>
		<description>John

&quot;&quot;I think the only reason we’re hearing about Neustar is because they’re also in the TLD business&quot;&quot;

Exactly

That&#039;s the problem as I see it</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John</p>
<p>&#8220;&#8221;I think the only reason we’re hearing about Neustar is because they’re also in the TLD business&#8221;"</p>
<p>Exactly</p>
<p>That&#8217;s the problem as I see it</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Daly of NameConnect.com</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2010/06/16/neustars-alternative-dns-service-is-blocking-parked-pages/comment-page-1/#comment-47843</link>
		<dc:creator>John Daly of NameConnect.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jun 2010 14:54:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=9626#comment-47843</guid>
		<description>Mike

The system redirects NX domains or domains that do not yet exist. It is strictly up to the ISP to delegate a block on any domains that currently exist (or at least it was when I left). In all truth the ISP could do this with or without DNSAdvantage but Neustar makes it quite easy for them, I don&#039;t think they really thought out the implications of this as Neustar considers their pockets first.

To be honest I wouldn&#039;t be too worried about this from Neustar...yet. They simply haven&#039;t gained much market, there&#039;s other companies that do this such as Paxfire.com who don&#039;t even consider Neustar a competitor, they physically go to the ISP and give them their Paxfire recursive box instead, have a wider range of the market and have been doing this for a longer period of time. I think the only reason we&#039;re hearing about Neustar is because they&#039;re also in the TLD business. 

Louise

DNSAdvantage does not favor any tld, again it is up to the ISP to put any safeguards on domains that exist.


Everyone is always banging on Neustar, can&#039;t we talk about the good they do? What about the finance student who learned a lesson by saving money when he deleted his .us and .biz portfolio, or the cripple who broke out of his wheel chair to reach the computer so he could get rid of the .us and .biz extension from his godaddy account. =)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike</p>
<p>The system redirects NX domains or domains that do not yet exist. It is strictly up to the ISP to delegate a block on any domains that currently exist (or at least it was when I left). In all truth the ISP could do this with or without DNSAdvantage but Neustar makes it quite easy for them, I don&#8217;t think they really thought out the implications of this as Neustar considers their pockets first.</p>
<p>To be honest I wouldn&#8217;t be too worried about this from Neustar&#8230;yet. They simply haven&#8217;t gained much market, there&#8217;s other companies that do this such as Paxfire.com who don&#8217;t even consider Neustar a competitor, they physically go to the ISP and give them their Paxfire recursive box instead, have a wider range of the market and have been doing this for a longer period of time. I think the only reason we&#8217;re hearing about Neustar is because they&#8217;re also in the TLD business. </p>
<p>Louise</p>
<p>DNSAdvantage does not favor any tld, again it is up to the ISP to put any safeguards on domains that exist.</p>
<p>Everyone is always banging on Neustar, can&#8217;t we talk about the good they do? What about the finance student who learned a lesson by saving money when he deleted his .us and .biz portfolio, or the cripple who broke out of his wheel chair to reach the computer so he could get rid of the .us and .biz extension from his godaddy account. =)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MHB</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2010/06/16/neustars-alternative-dns-service-is-blocking-parked-pages/comment-page-1/#comment-47841</link>
		<dc:creator>MHB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jun 2010 14:10:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=9626#comment-47841</guid>
		<description>Louise

I will ask them,  but I think the answer is no, because its up to the ISP to make the call on blocking or not blocking parked domains.  I don&#039;t think the ISP get to choose what to do by extension.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Louise</p>
<p>I will ask them,  but I think the answer is no, because its up to the ISP to make the call on blocking or not blocking parked domains.  I don&#8217;t think the ISP get to choose what to do by extension.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Louise</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2010/06/16/neustars-alternative-dns-service-is-blocking-parked-pages/comment-page-1/#comment-47838</link>
		<dc:creator>Louise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jun 2010 14:02:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=9626#comment-47838</guid>
		<description>MHB, Would you do this experiment?  Look up, Applyfor.us using dnsadvantage - I set to parked page.  Do you see the Moniker parked page?  Will dnsadvantage favor .us and .biz?

Thanx!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MHB, Would you do this experiment?  Look up, Applyfor.us using dnsadvantage &#8211; I set to parked page.  Do you see the Moniker parked page?  Will dnsadvantage favor .us and .biz?</p>
<p>Thanx!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

