Comments on: Google Is Now Fully Caffeinated As Its Web Indexing Project Is Complete

By: DN abc

DN abc — Fri, 02 Jul 2010 11:34:01 +0000

Those domainers that wouldn’t pay more than $500 don’t clearly understand the true value of that domain. That is why they usually miss all the good deals… fortunately for us
I’ve sold a domain for $xx,xxx that most people thought wasn’t much valuable.
Domainer appraisals aren’t worth much… most only think about quick flips…

By: MHB

MHB — Sun, 13 Jun 2010 14:08:11 +0000

Another

How does the fact that 3 bidders were willing to pay $20K or more for a domain you said no domainer would pay $500 for?

By: another domainer

another domainer — Sun, 13 Jun 2010 14:04:02 +0000

It was basically 3 bidders that took DiscountBedding from $ 1,200. to $ 22,300. (X, Jello, capitol). 91 bidders had placed min. bid.
Which confirms my point.

iReit owned it for years. I suspect someone (Daniel?) bought it and other domains as a package deal a few months before the NJ auction.

By: MHB

MHB — Sun, 13 Jun 2010 00:17:52 +0000

Another

Interesting you should say this:

For example, most domainers would not pay more than $ 500. for LuxuryBedding, com. And, only a few would be willing to pay more than $ 10K. for it. (I realize it only needs to be one.)

Since when it came to DiscountBedding.com I got it on NameJet.com and had to outbid other domainers paying around $25K for the domain

By: Mike

Mike — Sat, 12 Jun 2010 01:07:57 +0000

I am getting Google errors left and right all day. Guess they needed a double-shot because Server Error 501 is not supposed to happen on a live server. Especially Google’s.

By: Wallaceburg

Wallaceburg — Fri, 11 Jun 2010 01:40:10 +0000

It seems like Caffeine is already changing search. The speed of search is not noticeable to the average user, but the change in rankings for many keywords is evident. It looks like SEO’s across the globe will be working hard in the coming weeks to analyze and explain the algorithm changes. Thanks for the post, very informative!

By: MHB

MHB — Thu, 10 Jun 2010 23:47:19 +0000

VRtv

thanks

The post was about that fact that Google seems to be giving added importance to domains in their ranking under the caffeine system.

I just used my domains as examples.

Overall you seem to bear out that bang on domains get ranked higher and that is what is really important

By: VRtv

VRtv — Thu, 10 Jun 2010 23:43:28 +0000

hi good morning Sir MostWantedDomains//thedomains

i have cleared all cache & web’s-history , etc , in order to test through

yes ,
@ google ,
luxurybedding.com is #1 for “ luxury bedding “” ,
discountbedding.com is #1 for “ discount bedding “” ,
domaining.com is #1 for “domaining”" ,
domains.com is #1 for “domains”" ,
thedomains.com is #1 for “the domains”" ,
name.com is #1 for “name”" ,
etc ,

but ,
sorry , Sir MostWantedDomains ,
thedomains.com is #138 for “domains”" ,

i’m currently @ hk,china

seems like – u’d b better to buy up domains.com , etc ,
in order to b ranked as #1 for “domains”" by google ,—)

cheers , best ,

By: another domainer

another domainer — Thu, 10 Jun 2010 20:17:26 +0000

I was just using any domain as an example of the mindset of domainers.
Since, it was mentioned above, I used that one.

If I recall correctly, it was making around $ 500. a month with cpa. ???

By: LS Morgan

LS Morgan — Thu, 10 Jun 2010 19:58:27 +0000

“For example, most domainers would not pay more than $ 500. for LuxuryBedding, com”

That term gets over 100K gmsve, wordtracker 495 G-Daily about 700.
I’m pretty sure that if you announced LuxuryBedding.com was for sale @ $500, a line of domainers wanting to buy it would form that stretched from Portland, Oregon to Portland, Maine.

Congrats on getting it to P1 Pos1 on that term, Mr. Berkens. I’m sure it’s lucrative. In the year 2010, G rank is a colossal value driver that is sorely neglected by a lot of premium domain owners. Considering that development age plays a meaningful role in rank, getting the dev clock rolling with even BS development can be important.