<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Moniker.com Sells Photo.com For $1.25 Million</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thedomains.com/2010/05/04/moniker-com-sells-photo-com-for-1-25-million/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2010/05/04/moniker-com-sells-photo-com-for-1-25-million/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 20:38:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fan de photo web</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2010/05/04/moniker-com-sells-photo-com-for-1-25-million/comment-page-1/#comment-89065</link>
		<dc:creator>Fan de photo web</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jul 2011 18:12:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=8813#comment-89065</guid>
		<description>I agree the price seems too low. 
I really thought i would be like 5 to 10M$</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree the price seems too low.<br />
I really thought i would be like 5 to 10M$</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Photo.com Sells For $1,250,000 Via Moniker - Product Domains</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2010/05/04/moniker-com-sells-photo-com-for-1-25-million/comment-page-1/#comment-44042</link>
		<dc:creator>Photo.com Sells For $1,250,000 Via Moniker - Product Domains</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 May 2010 21:45:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=8813#comment-44042</guid>
		<description>[...] premium domain name Photo.com has sold for $1,250,000 via Moniker as reported here and here. This is another huge sale for 2010 and shows again that .com domains are the cream of the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] premium domain name Photo.com has sold for $1,250,000 via Moniker as reported here and here. This is another huge sale for 2010 and shows again that .com domains are the cream of the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Welcome To Brotherdaily.com &#187; Photo.com Sells For $1,250,000</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2010/05/04/moniker-com-sells-photo-com-for-1-25-million/comment-page-1/#comment-38350</link>
		<dc:creator>Welcome To Brotherdaily.com &#187; Photo.com Sells For $1,250,000</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 May 2010 12:22:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=8813#comment-38350</guid>
		<description>[...] Berkens of TheDomains.com posted yesterday that Moniker.com sold the domain name Photo.com for $1.25 million. Photo.com is [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Berkens of TheDomains.com posted yesterday that Moniker.com sold the domain name Photo.com for $1.25 million. Photo.com is [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 99% of the multi-billions users/multi-billion$ iPad/iPhone-like markets will use LCD displays</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2010/05/04/moniker-com-sells-photo-com-for-1-25-million/comment-page-1/#comment-38008</link>
		<dc:creator>99% of the multi-billions users/multi-billion$ iPad/iPhone-like markets will use LCD displays</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 May 2010 08:19:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=8813#comment-38008</guid>
		<description>however, I always register the singular and plural of a domain (when I find both, of course)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>however, I always register the singular and plural of a domain (when I find both, of course)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 99% of the multi-billions users/multi-billion$ iPad/iPhone-like markets will use LCD displays</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2010/05/04/moniker-com-sells-photo-com-for-1-25-million/comment-page-1/#comment-38007</link>
		<dc:creator>99% of the multi-billions users/multi-billion$ iPad/iPhone-like markets will use LCD displays</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 May 2010 08:17:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=8813#comment-38007</guid>
		<description>&quot;A domain like photo.com has alternatives like photos.com, picture.com, pictures.com – thats exactly why 1.25 M was probably top value for this domain.&quot;

but all them are already registered and the total number of photo related .com domains is just four

.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;A domain like photo.com has alternatives like photos.com, picture.com, pictures.com – thats exactly why 1.25 M was probably top value for this domain.&#8221;</p>
<p>but all them are already registered and the total number of photo related .com domains is just four</p>
<p>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chocolate Skateboarding Layouts &#124; Culturerage Skateboarding</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2010/05/04/moniker-com-sells-photo-com-for-1-25-million/comment-page-1/#comment-37979</link>
		<dc:creator>Chocolate Skateboarding Layouts &#124; Culturerage Skateboarding</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 May 2010 01:28:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=8813#comment-37979</guid>
		<description>[...] Moniker.com Sells Photo.com For $1.25 Million &#124; The Domains [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Moniker.com Sells Photo.com For $1.25 Million | The Domains [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Photo.com vendido por 1,25 millones de dólares &#124; Dnzapping</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2010/05/04/moniker-com-sells-photo-com-for-1-25-million/comment-page-1/#comment-37948</link>
		<dc:creator>Photo.com vendido por 1,25 millones de dólares &#124; Dnzapping</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 May 2010 21:52:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=8813#comment-37948</guid>
		<description>[...] Berkens ha confirmado la venta Photo.com por 1.250.000$. Esta venta ha saido gestionada por Moniker.  Noticias [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Berkens ha confirmado la venta Photo.com por 1.250.000$. Esta venta ha saido gestionada por Moniker.  Noticias [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2010/05/04/moniker-com-sells-photo-com-for-1-25-million/comment-page-1/#comment-37931</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 May 2010 19:01:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=8813#comment-37931</guid>
		<description>99%

&quot;what’s better than a site like photo.com ?&quot;

A domain like photo.com has alternatives like photos.com, picture.com, pictures.com - thats exactly why 1.25 M was probably top value for this domain.

Whenever a name has alternatives that easily switched with words which are just as commonly used in the same language it dilutes the value of any of them being some crazy number as value.

I can name 1,000 names better than this such as insurance.com, health.com, love.com, realestate.com etcccc ... so many which have no other words that define in such power the same category.

In addition, you have the singular plural effect - if photos.com sold for 1.25M I have a feeling your comments and feelings would be the exact same.

however if realestate(s).com, insurance(s).com, love(s).com, etc... sold for 1.25 anyone would think the buyer was an idiot.

A category killer word is great but just because its a single word doesn&#039;t mean its the only category killer for that field.  Single words are sort of a domainers thing - many two words beat single words anyday.

This name happened to get around 10,000 people a month according to compete which was probably a big part of the valuation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>99%</p>
<p>&#8220;what’s better than a site like photo.com ?&#8221;</p>
<p>A domain like photo.com has alternatives like photos.com, picture.com, pictures.com &#8211; thats exactly why 1.25 M was probably top value for this domain.</p>
<p>Whenever a name has alternatives that easily switched with words which are just as commonly used in the same language it dilutes the value of any of them being some crazy number as value.</p>
<p>I can name 1,000 names better than this such as insurance.com, health.com, love.com, realestate.com etcccc &#8230; so many which have no other words that define in such power the same category.</p>
<p>In addition, you have the singular plural effect &#8211; if photos.com sold for 1.25M I have a feeling your comments and feelings would be the exact same.</p>
<p>however if realestate(s).com, insurance(s).com, love(s).com, etc&#8230; sold for 1.25 anyone would think the buyer was an idiot.</p>
<p>A category killer word is great but just because its a single word doesn&#8217;t mean its the only category killer for that field.  Single words are sort of a domainers thing &#8211; many two words beat single words anyday.</p>
<p>This name happened to get around 10,000 people a month according to compete which was probably a big part of the valuation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: equipment hire</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2010/05/04/moniker-com-sells-photo-com-for-1-25-million/comment-page-1/#comment-37926</link>
		<dc:creator>equipment hire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 May 2010 17:41:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=8813#comment-37926</guid>
		<description>nice sale, and a very nice purchase
i think was a fair deal, slightly erring to the buyer getting the best deal</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nice sale, and a very nice purchase<br />
i think was a fair deal, slightly erring to the buyer getting the best deal</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chandan</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2010/05/04/moniker-com-sells-photo-com-for-1-25-million/comment-page-1/#comment-37877</link>
		<dc:creator>chandan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 May 2010 13:57:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=8813#comment-37877</guid>
		<description>what a sale :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what a sale <img src='http://www.thedomains.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

