<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Former Oversee Employees and Executive Starts SecondPorch.com &amp; Get $1M In Funding</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thedomains.com/2010/03/19/former-oversee-employees-and-executives-start-secondporch-com-get-1m-in-funding/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2010/03/19/former-oversee-employees-and-executives-start-secondporch-com-get-1m-in-funding/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 20:38:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: small domainer</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2010/03/19/former-oversee-employees-and-executives-start-secondporch-com-get-1m-in-funding/comment-page-1/#comment-28143</link>
		<dc:creator>small domainer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 01:58:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=7965#comment-28143</guid>
		<description>&quot;Most domainers would’ve chosen and ended up with some clumsy stupid 3 or 4 worder.

That’s the difference between entreprenures who actually do it, and domainers sitting at home who are still busy trying to acquire just *the* right domain name to start their “earth shattering company” (NOT)… &quot;

Aggro, you must be right.
I would have responded earlier but I got lost coming home tonight.

I was daydreaming about my next great domain creation using a domain spinner.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Most domainers would’ve chosen and ended up with some clumsy stupid 3 or 4 worder.</p>
<p>That’s the difference between entreprenures who actually do it, and domainers sitting at home who are still busy trying to acquire just *the* right domain name to start their “earth shattering company” (NOT)… &#8221;</p>
<p>Aggro, you must be right.<br />
I would have responded earlier but I got lost coming home tonight.</p>
<p>I was daydreaming about my next great domain creation using a domain spinner.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MHB</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2010/03/19/former-oversee-employees-and-executives-start-secondporch-com-get-1m-in-funding/comment-page-1/#comment-28139</link>
		<dc:creator>MHB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 20:06:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=7965#comment-28139</guid>
		<description>Aggro

I agree $1m in funding isn&#039;t going to even get that level of domain and the site was already up and running and the business operating prior to the funding.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aggro</p>
<p>I agree $1m in funding isn&#8217;t going to even get that level of domain and the site was already up and running and the business operating prior to the funding.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aggro</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2010/03/19/former-oversee-employees-and-executives-start-secondporch-com-get-1m-in-funding/comment-page-1/#comment-28138</link>
		<dc:creator>Aggro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 19:59:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=7965#comment-28138</guid>
		<description>Meant to include:

Category killer names are either developed (eg VacationRentals.com,  VacationHomes.com &amp; others similar) and would likely be prohibitively expensive to acquire  relative to the round of funding.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Meant to include:</p>
<p>Category killer names are either developed (eg VacationRentals.com,  VacationHomes.com &amp; others similar) and would likely be prohibitively expensive to acquire  relative to the round of funding.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aggro</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2010/03/19/former-oversee-employees-and-executives-start-secondporch-com-get-1m-in-funding/comment-page-1/#comment-28135</link>
		<dc:creator>Aggro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 19:27:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=7965#comment-28135</guid>
		<description>@ small domainer

There are always some who will forget the name, no matter what...even if its a 1 worder.

You probably have difficulty finding your way home every day...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ small domainer</p>
<p>There are always some who will forget the name, no matter what&#8230;even if its a 1 worder.</p>
<p>You probably have difficulty finding your way home every day&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aggro</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2010/03/19/former-oversee-employees-and-executives-start-secondporch-com-get-1m-in-funding/comment-page-1/#comment-28133</link>
		<dc:creator>Aggro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 19:24:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=7965#comment-28133</guid>
		<description>What - no Halvarez on board the new co ?

@ Tim Davids

It&#039;s a decent name.

Most services (like this one) do not have a short catchy name (1 or 2 worder) that is not too unnecessarily restrictive.
Most domainers would&#039;ve chosen and ended up with some clumsy stupid 3 or 4 worder.
 
That&#039;s the difference between entreprenures who actually do it, and domainers sitting at home who are still busy trying to acquire just *the* right domain name to start their &quot;earth shattering company&quot; (NOT)...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What &#8211; no Halvarez on board the new co ?</p>
<p>@ Tim Davids</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a decent name.</p>
<p>Most services (like this one) do not have a short catchy name (1 or 2 worder) that is not too unnecessarily restrictive.<br />
Most domainers would&#8217;ve chosen and ended up with some clumsy stupid 3 or 4 worder.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s the difference between entreprenures who actually do it, and domainers sitting at home who are still busy trying to acquire just *the* right domain name to start their &#8220;earth shattering company&#8221; (NOT)&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MHB</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2010/03/19/former-oversee-employees-and-executives-start-secondporch-com-get-1m-in-funding/comment-page-1/#comment-28127</link>
		<dc:creator>MHB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 16:54:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=7965#comment-28127</guid>
		<description>Stewart

I think you should not throw these kind of accusations around when not one shred of evidence has yet to come to light that involves any other employee or Oversee or Snapnames other than Brady.

Moreover there is no indication that any agency is investigating anyone related to this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stewart</p>
<p>I think you should not throw these kind of accusations around when not one shred of evidence has yet to come to light that involves any other employee or Oversee or Snapnames other than Brady.</p>
<p>Moreover there is no indication that any agency is investigating anyone related to this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stewart</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2010/03/19/former-oversee-employees-and-executives-start-secondporch-com-get-1m-in-funding/comment-page-1/#comment-28126</link>
		<dc:creator>stewart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 16:31:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=7965#comment-28126</guid>
		<description>all the usual suspects I suppose from the snap names scandal yet to be deposed by the fed in a rico indictment? is that who they all are?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>all the usual suspects I suppose from the snap names scandal yet to be deposed by the fed in a rico indictment? is that who they all are?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: small domainer</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2010/03/19/former-oversee-employees-and-executives-start-secondporch-com-get-1m-in-funding/comment-page-1/#comment-28125</link>
		<dc:creator>small domainer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 15:32:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=7965#comment-28125</guid>
		<description>I agree with Tim.
The chances of me remembering SecondPoach is slim.
Oh, I meant to type FirstPorch.

See, I&#039;m already confused.

These pros should no better. And, they had access and ability to acquire an outstanding domain.
 
Now, they will have to spend a lot of money and effort for me to remember it.  

But, I guess if they thought oversee.net was the best name to lauch a company, they might know something I don&#039;t know.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Tim.<br />
The chances of me remembering SecondPoach is slim.<br />
Oh, I meant to type FirstPorch.</p>
<p>See, I&#8217;m already confused.</p>
<p>These pros should no better. And, they had access and ability to acquire an outstanding domain.</p>
<p>Now, they will have to spend a lot of money and effort for me to remember it.  </p>
<p>But, I guess if they thought oversee.net was the best name to lauch a company, they might know something I don&#8217;t know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Davids</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2010/03/19/former-oversee-employees-and-executives-start-secondporch-com-get-1m-in-funding/comment-page-1/#comment-28122</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Davids</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 12:46:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=7965#comment-28122</guid>
		<description>interesting that people from within the domain world didnt use a category killer or even a descripive string.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>interesting that people from within the domain world didnt use a category killer or even a descripive string.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AronMeystedt.com</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2010/03/19/former-oversee-employees-and-executives-start-secondporch-com-get-1m-in-funding/comment-page-1/#comment-28121</link>
		<dc:creator>AronMeystedt.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 11:48:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=7965#comment-28121</guid>
		<description>Great story Michael. 

Do you think that they should have got SecondHandPorch.com as well?

AronMeystedt.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great story Michael. </p>
<p>Do you think that they should have got SecondHandPorch.com as well?</p>
<p>AronMeystedt.com</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

