<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Australian Trademark Office: Apple Does Not Own The Letter &#8220;i&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thedomains.com/2010/03/15/australian-trademark-office-apple-does-not-own-the-letter-i/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2010/03/15/australian-trademark-office-apple-does-not-own-the-letter-i/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 20:38:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arizona Patent Attorney</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2010/03/15/australian-trademark-office-apple-does-not-own-the-letter-i/comment-page-1/#comment-88864</link>
		<dc:creator>Arizona Patent Attorney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jul 2011 19:13:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=7861#comment-88864</guid>
		<description>There are similar cases here in the US, and definitely plenty of anecdotal evidence similar to the judge&#039;s examples.  There are now so many different kinds of &quot;i&quot; products and &quot;i&quot; services that it may be impossible for Apple ever to claim it controls a family of &quot;i&quot; goods and services.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are similar cases here in the US, and definitely plenty of anecdotal evidence similar to the judge&#8217;s examples.  There are now so many different kinds of &#8220;i&#8221; products and &#8220;i&#8221; services that it may be impossible for Apple ever to claim it controls a family of &#8220;i&#8221; goods and services.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reasons For Hiring A Business Attorney &#124; AttorneyPlanet.info</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2010/03/15/australian-trademark-office-apple-does-not-own-the-letter-i/comment-page-1/#comment-27878</link>
		<dc:creator>Reasons For Hiring A Business Attorney &#124; AttorneyPlanet.info</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 06:33:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=7861#comment-27878</guid>
		<description>[...] Australian Trademark Office: Apple Does Not Own The Letter “i &#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Australian Trademark Office: Apple Does Not Own The Letter “i &#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Apple no tiene el monopolio de la letra i &#124; Dnzapping</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2010/03/15/australian-trademark-office-apple-does-not-own-the-letter-i/comment-page-1/#comment-27829</link>
		<dc:creator>Apple no tiene el monopolio de la letra i &#124; Dnzapping</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 18:57:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=7861#comment-27829</guid>
		<description>[...] un caso decidido la semana pasada por el Registro de Marcas australiano Apple objet&#243; que se [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] un caso decidido la semana pasada por el Registro de Marcas australiano Apple objet&oacute; que se [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Superscope Report &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Branding News</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2010/03/15/australian-trademark-office-apple-does-not-own-the-letter-i/comment-page-1/#comment-27808</link>
		<dc:creator>Superscope Report &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Branding News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 15:59:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=7861#comment-27808</guid>
		<description>[...] brand that came into Apple&#8217;s legal crosshairs this go-around is DOPi. Apple argued, &#8220;The emphasis given to the letter &#8216;i&#8217; results in the consumer&#8217;s attention [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] brand that came into Apple&#8217;s legal crosshairs this go-around is DOPi. Apple argued, &#8220;The emphasis given to the letter &#8216;i&#8217; results in the consumer&rsquo;s attention [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2010/03/15/australian-trademark-office-apple-does-not-own-the-letter-i/comment-page-1/#comment-27736</link>
		<dc:creator>$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 16:56:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=7861#comment-27736</guid>
		<description>.

why don&#039;t use their time to add a multitasking OS to the iPad instead of lose time to sue all parked domains with an &quot;i&quot; inside?

90% of (potential) users answers in my international POLL about the iPad/TabletPC want it

ht
tp://alt-pad.blogspot.c
om/

.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>.</p>
<p>why don&#8217;t use their time to add a multitasking OS to the iPad instead of lose time to sue all parked domains with an &#8220;i&#8221; inside?</p>
<p>90% of (potential) users answers in my international POLL about the iPad/TabletPC want it</p>
<p>ht<br />
tp://alt-pad.blogspot.c<br />
om/</p>
<p>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

