<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Who Dat? That Who Owns The Rights To It? NFL, WhoDat? Inc, WhoDat.com Or Nobody</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thedomains.com/2010/03/06/who-dat-that-who-owns-the-rights-to-it-nfl-whodat-inc-whodat-com-or-nobody/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2010/03/06/who-dat-that-who-owns-the-rights-to-it-nfl-whodat-inc-whodat-com-or-nobody/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 20:38:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rashid Mahmood</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2010/03/06/who-dat-that-who-owns-the-rights-to-it-nfl-whodat-inc-whodat-com-or-nobody/comment-page-1/#comment-27362</link>
		<dc:creator>Rashid Mahmood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 16:07:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=7737#comment-27362</guid>
		<description>I actually like the preceding “visit” and ending “vacation” and “vacations” .com geographical names.
Many tourism departments have adopted these names (VisitFlorida.com, VisitMaine, etc.), as a result they inherit a built in trust at a FRACTION of the cost of the pure destination name.
I don’t know much about Bolivia’s tourism, but $3,500 is pretty cheap.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I actually like the preceding “visit” and ending “vacation” and “vacations” .com geographical names.<br />
Many tourism departments have adopted these names (VisitFlorida.com, VisitMaine, etc.), as a result they inherit a built in trust at a FRACTION of the cost of the pure destination name.<br />
I don’t know much about Bolivia’s tourism, but $3,500 is pretty cheap.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MHB</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2010/03/06/who-dat-that-who-owns-the-rights-to-it-nfl-whodat-inc-whodat-com-or-nobody/comment-page-1/#comment-27269</link>
		<dc:creator>MHB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Mar 2010 15:55:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=7737#comment-27269</guid>
		<description>Tom

Well I the companies defense they do have a state trademark and a long history of use, but to answer you question yes, you can gain a common law trademark right by usage of the term</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tom</p>
<p>Well I the companies defense they do have a state trademark and a long history of use, but to answer you question yes, you can gain a common law trademark right by usage of the term</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Hough</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2010/03/06/who-dat-that-who-owns-the-rights-to-it-nfl-whodat-inc-whodat-com-or-nobody/comment-page-1/#comment-27257</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Hough</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Mar 2010 01:38:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=7737#comment-27257</guid>
		<description>If I set up a company called F__k You Inc can sue anyone that uses that term without my permission?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If I set up a company called F__k You Inc can sue anyone that uses that term without my permission?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

