Comments on: Report Finds Against ICANN In Denying The .XXX Extension & Charges Them The $475K Cost http://www.thedomains.com/2010/02/20/report-finds-against-icann-in-denying-the-xxx-extension-charges-them-the-475k-cost/ Sun, 12 Feb 2012 20:38:46 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Analitics http://www.thedomains.com/2010/02/20/report-finds-against-icann-in-denying-the-xxx-extension-charges-them-the-475k-cost/comment-page-1/#comment-79487 Analitics Mon, 21 Mar 2011 14:16:46 +0000 http://www.thedomains.com/?p=7506#comment-79487 @John 100% agree with you point of view @John

100% agree with you point of view

]]> By: ICANN makes it trivial to block pr0n « Balneus http://www.thedomains.com/2010/02/20/report-finds-against-icann-in-denying-the-xxx-extension-charges-them-the-475k-cost/comment-page-1/#comment-48615 ICANN makes it trivial to block pr0n « Balneus Sun, 27 Jun 2010 06:18:08 +0000 http://www.thedomains.com/?p=7506#comment-48615 [...] "Report Finds Against ICANN In Denying The .XXX Extension & Charges Them The $475K Cost" (2010-02-20) [...] [...] "Report Finds Against ICANN In Denying The .XXX Extension & Charges Them The $475K Cost" (2010-02-20) [...]

]]> By: ICANN To Approve .XXX | Domaining Manual http://www.thedomains.com/2010/02/20/report-finds-against-icann-in-denying-the-xxx-extension-charges-them-the-475k-cost/comment-page-1/#comment-48329 ICANN To Approve .XXX | Domaining Manual Thu, 24 Jun 2010 13:30:49 +0000 http://www.thedomains.com/?p=7506#comment-48329 [...] the findings of the independent review panel which found that ICANN acted against its own rules when it rejected the .X..., it appears ICANN board has no choice but to approve the [...] [...] the findings of the independent review panel which found that ICANN acted against its own rules when it rejected the .X…, it appears ICANN board has no choice but to approve the [...]

]]> By: After Spending $9 Million Trying To Get The .XXX Extension, ICM Goes On The Offense | Domaining Manual http://www.thedomains.com/2010/02/20/report-finds-against-icann-in-denying-the-xxx-extension-charges-them-the-475k-cost/comment-page-1/#comment-33318 After Spending $9 Million Trying To Get The .XXX Extension, ICM Goes On The Offense | Domaining Manual Sun, 18 Apr 2010 23:39:22 +0000 http://www.thedomains.com/?p=7506#comment-33318 [...] ICM first applied to run the registry for the .XXX extension in 2000, reapplied in 2004 and is currently awaiting ICANN’s final decision after a recent three member “Independent Review Process” Panel found that ICANN wrongful.... [...] [...] ICM first applied to run the registry for the .XXX extension in 2000, reapplied in 2004 and is currently awaiting ICANN’s final decision after a recent three member “Independent Review Process” Panel found that ICANN wrongful…. [...]

]]> By: Sex.Sex Trademark Owner Searching For A Buyer | DomainerHouse http://www.thedomains.com/2010/02/20/report-finds-against-icann-in-denying-the-xxx-extension-charges-them-the-475k-cost/comment-page-1/#comment-29485 Sex.Sex Trademark Owner Searching For A Buyer | DomainerHouse Wed, 31 Mar 2010 03:56:37 +0000 http://www.thedomains.com/?p=7506#comment-29485 [...] and claims like this when other new gTLDs actually go live.  There was also a great deal of trouble getting .xxx approved, so why would a .sex TLD be any easier to get [...] [...] and claims like this when other new gTLDs actually go live.  There was also a great deal of trouble getting .xxx approved, so why would a .sex TLD be any easier to get [...]

]]> By: Sex.Sex Trademark Owner Searching For A Buyer | Domain Name News http://www.thedomains.com/2010/02/20/report-finds-against-icann-in-denying-the-xxx-extension-charges-them-the-475k-cost/comment-page-1/#comment-29481 Sex.Sex Trademark Owner Searching For A Buyer | Domain Name News Wed, 31 Mar 2010 03:09:07 +0000 http://www.thedomains.com/?p=7506#comment-29481 [...] and claims like this when other new gTLDs actually go live.  There was also a great deal of trouble getting .xxx approved, so why would a .sex TLD be any easier to get [...] [...] and claims like this when other new gTLDs actually go live.  There was also a great deal of trouble getting .xxx approved, so why would a .sex TLD be any easier to get [...]

]]> By: Rashid Mahmood http://www.thedomains.com/2010/02/20/report-finds-against-icann-in-denying-the-xxx-extension-charges-them-the-475k-cost/comment-page-1/#comment-26827 Rashid Mahmood Sat, 27 Feb 2010 05:01:42 +0000 http://www.thedomains.com/?p=7506#comment-26827 Domain space will change continuously after ICANN starts allocating new TLDs, even though there will hardly be any effect on the dominance of .com extension. Domain space will change continuously after ICANN starts allocating new TLDs, even though there will hardly be any effect on the dominance of .com extension.

]]> By: You Get The . Info » Independent Review Finds ICANN Screwed Up In Approving… Then Rejecting .xxx – 3149th Edition http://www.thedomains.com/2010/02/20/report-finds-against-icann-in-denying-the-xxx-extension-charges-them-the-475k-cost/comment-page-1/#comment-26731 You Get The . Info » Independent Review Finds ICANN Screwed Up In Approving… Then Rejecting .xxx – 3149th Edition Tue, 23 Feb 2010 20:51:35 +0000 http://www.thedomains.com/?p=7506#comment-26731 [...] resolution, which was released last Friday. So, after all these many years, the review found that ICANN totally screwed up, and it never should have backed down after its 2005 approval of .xxx. It’s also demanding [...] [...] resolution, which was released last Friday. So, after all these many years, the review found that ICANN totally screwed up, and it never should have backed down after its 2005 approval of .xxx. It’s also demanding [...]

]]> By: Will ICANN On Now Approve .XXX? ICM Says Yes; ICANN Seems To Say No | Domaining Manual http://www.thedomains.com/2010/02/20/report-finds-against-icann-in-denying-the-xxx-extension-charges-them-the-475k-cost/comment-page-1/#comment-26697 Will ICANN On Now Approve .XXX? ICM Says Yes; ICANN Seems To Say No | Domaining Manual Tue, 23 Feb 2010 01:13:01 +0000 http://www.thedomains.com/?p=7506#comment-26697 [...] As we wrote about over the weekend the independent panel that reviewed ICANN’s handling of the application of ICM Registry to run the .xxx registry, ruled that since ICANN voted to approve the application it should have allowed it to move forward without the additional review it understook. [...] [...] As we wrote about over the weekend the independent panel that reviewed ICANN’s handling of the application of ICM Registry to run the .xxx registry, ruled that since ICANN voted to approve the application it should have allowed it to move forward without the additional review it understook. [...]

]]> By: ICANN goofed when it rejected the proposed .xxx top-level domain, according to an independent panel. http://www.thedomains.com/2010/02/20/report-finds-against-icann-in-denying-the-xxx-extension-charges-them-the-475k-cost/comment-page-1/#comment-26693 ICANN goofed when it rejected the proposed .xxx top-level domain, according to an independent panel. Mon, 22 Feb 2010 23:14:05 +0000 http://www.thedomains.com/?p=7506#comment-26693 [...] when it rejected the proposed .xxx top-level domain, according to an independent panel. Read more: The Domains , TechDirt about February 22, 2010 4:05 PM - by Eric [...] [...] when it rejected the proposed .xxx top-level domain, according to an independent panel. Read more: The Domains , TechDirt about February 22, 2010 4:05 PM – by Eric [...]

]]>