ShoePavilion.com Sells For $15K On NameJet.com

2009 December 22
by Michael H. Berkens

The domain name ShoePavilion.com sold on NameJet.com today for $15,600.

The domain which still gets over 3K monthly visitors according to Compete.com had as many as 25K monthly visitors a year ago.

speakerphone.com on a re-auction went for $9,900 slightly higher than it sold for a month ago on NameJet.com

Nutriscience.com sold for $5,200 despite a trademark being registered on the term.

Finally a few days ago a domain with quite a bit of traffic, FirstNationalBank.com, sold for $69K,

8 Responses leave one →
  1. 2009 December 23

    MarketingPromotions.com re-auctioned and sold on NameJet

  2. 2009 December 23

    Another that fraud bidder “ThisIsIt” failed on was Horan.com – which just went back into auction yesterday
    Brian

  3. 2009 December 23

    NameJet fraud bidder “ThisIsIt” also played a substatial role in running up Ojos.com the same day he won Horan.com and MarketingPromotions.com the first time around – will NameJet be crediting Ojos.com top bidder “closed” something on that one ?

  4. 2009 December 23
    Joe permalink

    NameJet should return some of the money or re-auction those names where nopay fraud bidders are involved. Those fake “halvarez” type bidders bid up the price not just a littble but crazily.

  5. 2009 December 23
    Joe permalink

    That’s the reason why I always not bid high against those fishy not verified bidders. I am right 90% of the time.

  6. 2009 December 23
    MHB permalink

    Brian

    I think you make a great point.

    Auctions that include the same dead beat bidder need to be addressed.

  7. 2009 December 31

    Yes, I was in a few suspicious auctions at Namejet and the winners didn’t pay the final auction price and ended up for reauctioning the domains.

Trackbacks & Pingbacks

  1. Tweets that mention ShoePavilion.com Sells For $15K On NameJet.com | The Domains -- Topsy.com

Leave a Reply

Note: You can use basic XHTML in your comments. Your email address will never be published.

Subscribe to this comment feed via RSS

Please copy the string uliBq4 to the field below: