<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: This Time Its Microsoft That&#8217;s Sued For TradeMark Infringement For Bing: Good Thing For MSFT There Is No Quick Take down Procedure In Place, YET</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thedomains.com/2009/12/17/this-time-its-microsoft-thats-sued-for-trademark-infringement-for-bing-good-thing-for-msft-there-is-no-quick-take-down-procedure-in-place-yet/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2009/12/17/this-time-its-microsoft-thats-sued-for-trademark-infringement-for-bing-good-thing-for-msft-there-is-no-quick-take-down-procedure-in-place-yet/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 20:38:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: This Time Its Microsoft That&#39;s Sued For TradeMark Infringement For &#8230; &#124; VRYTEK</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2009/12/17/this-time-its-microsoft-thats-sued-for-trademark-infringement-for-bing-good-thing-for-msft-there-is-no-quick-take-down-procedure-in-place-yet/comment-page-1/#comment-25888</link>
		<dc:creator>This Time Its Microsoft That&#39;s Sued For TradeMark Infringement For &#8230; &#124; VRYTEK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 15:58:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=6603#comment-25888</guid>
		<description>[...] Read this article: This Time Its Microsoft That&#039;s Sued For TradeMark Infringement For &#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Read this article: This Time Its Microsoft That&#39;s Sued For TradeMark Infringement For &#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bogus Bing Trademark Infringement Lawsuit</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2009/12/17/this-time-its-microsoft-thats-sued-for-trademark-infringement-for-bing-good-thing-for-msft-there-is-no-quick-take-down-procedure-in-place-yet/comment-page-1/#comment-24190</link>
		<dc:creator>Bogus Bing Trademark Infringement Lawsuit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2009 10:17:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=6603#comment-24190</guid>
		<description>[...] degree of scepticism is observed in public response to the trademark infringement lawsuit filed against Microsoft by a small St. Louis design company [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] degree of scepticism is observed in public response to the trademark infringement lawsuit filed against Microsoft by a small St. Louis design company [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gabriel Harper</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2009/12/17/this-time-its-microsoft-thats-sued-for-trademark-infringement-for-bing-good-thing-for-msft-there-is-no-quick-take-down-procedure-in-place-yet/comment-page-1/#comment-24189</link>
		<dc:creator>Gabriel Harper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2009 10:15:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=6603#comment-24189</guid>
		<description>There are actually less than ten registered trademarks for the word mark &quot;Bing&quot;, not 104. The other 95 or so have multiple words. Also, of these word marks, a few are clearly dissimilar goods.

Just &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.gabrielharper.com/2009/12/bogus-bing-trademark-infringement-lawsuit/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;ranted about the infringement suit&lt;/a&gt; on my blog - I don&#039;t think anyone sees Microsoft suffering much from this but there are complexities to the case that should make it interesting.

The distinction here is less clear, and it may be reasonable to consider one company diverging into the other&#039;s market. Both trademarks specify online advertising activity as part of the business.

Even if they are considered dissimilar the priority mark would win all other factors equal - pretty clear MS has clarity and a much stronger mark.

All this free publicity is a sure motive though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are actually less than ten registered trademarks for the word mark &#8220;Bing&#8221;, not 104. The other 95 or so have multiple words. Also, of these word marks, a few are clearly dissimilar goods.</p>
<p>Just <a href="http://www.gabrielharper.com/2009/12/bogus-bing-trademark-infringement-lawsuit/" rel="nofollow">ranted about the infringement suit</a> on my blog &#8211; I don&#8217;t think anyone sees Microsoft suffering much from this but there are complexities to the case that should make it interesting.</p>
<p>The distinction here is less clear, and it may be reasonable to consider one company diverging into the other&#8217;s market. Both trademarks specify online advertising activity as part of the business.</p>
<p>Even if they are considered dissimilar the priority mark would win all other factors equal &#8211; pretty clear MS has clarity and a much stronger mark.</p>
<p>All this free publicity is a sure motive though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: About bing! design firm, bing! information design, bing search, bing trademark, microsoft sued &#124; Find me About</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2009/12/17/this-time-its-microsoft-thats-sued-for-trademark-infringement-for-bing-good-thing-for-msft-there-is-no-quick-take-down-procedure-in-place-yet/comment-page-1/#comment-24049</link>
		<dc:creator>About bing! design firm, bing! information design, bing search, bing trademark, microsoft sued &#124; Find me About</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 10:59:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=6603#comment-24049</guid>
		<description>[...] by MHB A St. Louis company Bing! Information Design filed suit this week against Microsoft for alleged trademark infringement and unfair competition, &#8230;Read Original Story: This Time Its Microsoft That&#039;s Sued For TradeMark Infringement For Bing: Go... [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] by MHB A St. Louis company Bing! Information Design filed suit this week against Microsoft for alleged trademark infringement and unfair competition, &#8230;Read Original Story: This Time Its Microsoft That&#39;s Sued For TradeMark Infringement For Bing: Go&#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WTF</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2009/12/17/this-time-its-microsoft-thats-sued-for-trademark-infringement-for-bing-good-thing-for-msft-there-is-no-quick-take-down-procedure-in-place-yet/comment-page-1/#comment-24044</link>
		<dc:creator>WTF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 10:05:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=6603#comment-24044</guid>
		<description>TM infringement is only applied to names that have a similar product. If bing.biz was a search engine, then MS might have something to worry about. However it some graphic design site that is just phishing for a settlement. There is no brand confusion, thus no TM infringement.

Now bing is a generic word, and Microsoft WILL be suing you if you own say bing*anything*.com - Which I think is bullocks because they are a search engine thus claiming anything can be related to BING and since they are MSFT you will instantly lose your domain. But of course since the law of domains are governed by corporations, evil, and money -- parking a domain is considered &quot;bad-faith&quot; and half the nut-jobs on these blogs and forums agree w/ that, so I guess don&#039;t park any domain w/ &quot;bing&quot; in it.

When are the lawsuits going to end? Why is everything translatable to $$$? If you fall on wet floor, that somehow = money for you. If you burn yourself w/ hot-coffee then you should get lots of money... There should be a law, if you lose a lawsuit against somebody you should have to pay the amount you are suing for. This to me makes perfect sense.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TM infringement is only applied to names that have a similar product. If bing.biz was a search engine, then MS might have something to worry about. However it some graphic design site that is just phishing for a settlement. There is no brand confusion, thus no TM infringement.</p>
<p>Now bing is a generic word, and Microsoft WILL be suing you if you own say bing*anything*.com &#8211; Which I think is bullocks because they are a search engine thus claiming anything can be related to BING and since they are MSFT you will instantly lose your domain. But of course since the law of domains are governed by corporations, evil, and money &#8212; parking a domain is considered &#8220;bad-faith&#8221; and half the nut-jobs on these blogs and forums agree w/ that, so I guess don&#8217;t park any domain w/ &#8220;bing&#8221; in it.</p>
<p>When are the lawsuits going to end? Why is everything translatable to $$$? If you fall on wet floor, that somehow = money for you. If you burn yourself w/ hot-coffee then you should get lots of money&#8230; There should be a law, if you lose a lawsuit against somebody you should have to pay the amount you are suing for. This to me makes perfect sense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: About bing! design firm, bing! information design, bing search, bing trademark, design company bing, microsoft bing &#124; Find me About</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2009/12/17/this-time-its-microsoft-thats-sued-for-trademark-infringement-for-bing-good-thing-for-msft-there-is-no-quick-take-down-procedure-in-place-yet/comment-page-1/#comment-23983</link>
		<dc:creator>About bing! design firm, bing! information design, bing search, bing trademark, design company bing, microsoft bing &#124; Find me About</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Dec 2009 23:13:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=6603#comment-23983</guid>
		<description>[...] by MHB A St. Louis company Bing! Information Design filed suit this week against Microsoft for alleged trademark infringement and unfair competition, over Microsoft&#8217;s used of the term “Bing” as its new search engine. Bing! Information Design is a small &#8230;Read Original Story: This Time Its Microsoft That&#039;s Sued For TradeMark Infringement For Bing: Go... [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] by MHB A St. Louis company Bing! Information Design filed suit this week against Microsoft for alleged trademark infringement and unfair competition, over Microsoft&#8217;s used of the term “Bing” as its new search engine. Bing! Information Design is a small &#8230;Read Original Story: This Time Its Microsoft That&#39;s Sued For TradeMark Infringement For Bing: Go&#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Domainer</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2009/12/17/this-time-its-microsoft-thats-sued-for-trademark-infringement-for-bing-good-thing-for-msft-there-is-no-quick-take-down-procedure-in-place-yet/comment-page-1/#comment-23884</link>
		<dc:creator>Domainer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 23:46:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=6603#comment-23884</guid>
		<description>Bing.ro  (2003) a webdesign comp in Romania. What they have to do? Any opinions?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bing.ro  (2003) a webdesign comp in Romania. What they have to do? Any opinions?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Davids</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2009/12/17/this-time-its-microsoft-thats-sued-for-trademark-infringement-for-bing-good-thing-for-msft-there-is-no-quick-take-down-procedure-in-place-yet/comment-page-1/#comment-23880</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Davids</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 21:56:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=6603#comment-23880</guid>
		<description>They should be thanking MS...they have prolly got more leads now than in the past 10 yrs combined</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They should be thanking MS&#8230;they have prolly got more leads now than in the past 10 yrs combined</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MHB</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2009/12/17/this-time-its-microsoft-thats-sued-for-trademark-infringement-for-bing-good-thing-for-msft-there-is-no-quick-take-down-procedure-in-place-yet/comment-page-1/#comment-23878</link>
		<dc:creator>MHB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 21:23:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=6603#comment-23878</guid>
		<description>Russ

Can you go to court to stop a URS from happening?

Where do you get that from?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Russ</p>
<p>Can you go to court to stop a URS from happening?</p>
<p>Where do you get that from?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Russ</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2009/12/17/this-time-its-microsoft-thats-sued-for-trademark-infringement-for-bing-good-thing-for-msft-there-is-no-quick-take-down-procedure-in-place-yet/comment-page-1/#comment-23874</link>
		<dc:creator>Russ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 19:40:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=6603#comment-23874</guid>
		<description>Do you really think Microsoft&#039;s Bing.com could get taken out by a URS?  Get real.

Their lawyers would be in court to stop the URS request faster than you can say &quot;bing&quot;

This applies to any large company or site.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you really think Microsoft&#8217;s Bing.com could get taken out by a URS?  Get real.</p>
<p>Their lawyers would be in court to stop the URS request faster than you can say &#8220;bing&#8221;</p>
<p>This applies to any large company or site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

