<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Move Over Danica; Pamela Anderson Is Newest Domain Name Spokesperson In Commercial For CrazyDomains &amp; (Yes You can Watch It Here)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thedomains.com/2009/12/15/move-over-danica-pamela-anderson-is-newest-domain-name-spokesperson-in-commercial-for-crazydomains-yes-you-can-watch-it-here/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2009/12/15/move-over-danica-pamela-anderson-is-newest-domain-name-spokesperson-in-commercial-for-crazydomains-yes-you-can-watch-it-here/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 20:38:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Worst Domain Name Promotion of All Time &#124; Domaining Manual</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2009/12/15/move-over-danica-pamela-anderson-is-newest-domain-name-spokesperson-in-commercial-for-crazydomains-yes-you-can-watch-it-here/comment-page-1/#comment-28312</link>
		<dc:creator>The Worst Domain Name Promotion of All Time &#124; Domaining Manual</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Mar 2010 15:15:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=6561#comment-28312</guid>
		<description>[...] to copy Go Daddy&#8217;s successful commercials haven&#8217;t stopped. At least Crazy Domains hired an A-list name for its [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to copy Go Daddy&#8217;s successful commercials haven&#8217;t stopped. At least Crazy Domains hired an A-list name for its [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Worst Domain Name Promotion of All Time &#124; DomainerHouse</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2009/12/15/move-over-danica-pamela-anderson-is-newest-domain-name-spokesperson-in-commercial-for-crazydomains-yes-you-can-watch-it-here/comment-page-1/#comment-28310</link>
		<dc:creator>The Worst Domain Name Promotion of All Time &#124; DomainerHouse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Mar 2010 14:54:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=6561#comment-28310</guid>
		<description>[...] to copy Go Daddy&#8217;s successful commercials haven&#8217;t stopped. At least Crazy Domains hired an A-list name for its [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to copy Go Daddy&#8217;s successful commercials haven&#8217;t stopped. At least Crazy Domains hired an A-list name for its [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Domain Name Wire &#187; News &#187; The Worst Domain Name Promotion of All Time - The Domain Industry's News Source</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2009/12/15/move-over-danica-pamela-anderson-is-newest-domain-name-spokesperson-in-commercial-for-crazydomains-yes-you-can-watch-it-here/comment-page-1/#comment-28304</link>
		<dc:creator>Domain Name Wire &#187; News &#187; The Worst Domain Name Promotion of All Time - The Domain Industry's News Source</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Mar 2010 14:04:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=6561#comment-28304</guid>
		<description>[...] to copy Go Daddy&#8217;s successful commercials haven&#8217;t stopped. At least Crazy Domains hired an A-list name for its [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to copy Go Daddy&#8217;s successful commercials haven&#8217;t stopped. At least Crazy Domains hired an A-list name for its [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Move Over Danica; Pamela Anderson Is Newest Domain Name &#8230; &#124; VRYTEK</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2009/12/15/move-over-danica-pamela-anderson-is-newest-domain-name-spokesperson-in-commercial-for-crazydomains-yes-you-can-watch-it-here/comment-page-1/#comment-25886</link>
		<dc:creator>Move Over Danica; Pamela Anderson Is Newest Domain Name &#8230; &#124; VRYTEK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 15:53:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=6561#comment-25886</guid>
		<description>[...] See the article here: Move Over Danica; Pamela Anderson Is Newest Domain Name &#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] See the article here: Move Over Danica; Pamela Anderson Is Newest Domain Name &#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leeds Escorts</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2009/12/15/move-over-danica-pamela-anderson-is-newest-domain-name-spokesperson-in-commercial-for-crazydomains-yes-you-can-watch-it-here/comment-page-1/#comment-25842</link>
		<dc:creator>Leeds Escorts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 01:17:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=6561#comment-25842</guid>
		<description>did anyone see the banners about this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>did anyone see the banners about this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BullshitPolitics</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2009/12/15/move-over-danica-pamela-anderson-is-newest-domain-name-spokesperson-in-commercial-for-crazydomains-yes-you-can-watch-it-here/comment-page-1/#comment-23867</link>
		<dc:creator>BullshitPolitics</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 17:06:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=6561#comment-23867</guid>
		<description>Guys, I&#039;m in the USA, was born and raised here! 

All I can say the more.. drama and sex.. You win! 
ofcourse they will hit a homerun, still curious what
Ms. Obama would look like in a Bikini, OK.. back to 
commercial again .. LOL</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Guys, I&#8217;m in the USA, was born and raised here! </p>
<p>All I can say the more.. drama and sex.. You win!<br />
ofcourse they will hit a homerun, still curious what<br />
Ms. Obama would look like in a Bikini, OK.. back to<br />
commercial again .. LOL</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chip Meade</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2009/12/15/move-over-danica-pamela-anderson-is-newest-domain-name-spokesperson-in-commercial-for-crazydomains-yes-you-can-watch-it-here/comment-page-1/#comment-23734</link>
		<dc:creator>Chip Meade</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 16:19:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=6561#comment-23734</guid>
		<description>Good Point Aron. This is Crazy man...CrazyDomains that is!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good Point Aron. This is Crazy man&#8230;CrazyDomains that is!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aron -  Symbolics.com</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2009/12/15/move-over-danica-pamela-anderson-is-newest-domain-name-spokesperson-in-commercial-for-crazydomains-yes-you-can-watch-it-here/comment-page-1/#comment-23731</link>
		<dc:creator>Aron -  Symbolics.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 16:11:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=6561#comment-23731</guid>
		<description>This is what they wanted... for us to talk about their company.

Success.

Without this ad, we&#039;d never be having a discussion about
CrazyDomains.com.au</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is what they wanted&#8230; for us to talk about their company.</p>
<p>Success.</p>
<p>Without this ad, we&#8217;d never be having a discussion about<br />
CrazyDomains.com.au</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chip Meade</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2009/12/15/move-over-danica-pamela-anderson-is-newest-domain-name-spokesperson-in-commercial-for-crazydomains-yes-you-can-watch-it-here/comment-page-1/#comment-23730</link>
		<dc:creator>Chip Meade</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 16:02:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=6561#comment-23730</guid>
		<description>Alan:  

My comments are only directed as an overall comment if they were to try to break into the US market with advertising, much like GoDaddy did. I have no idea if they want to stick with Australia only and what the advertising market looks like as it related to sex in Australia. 

I will also grant that two companies does not an industry make, but when it comes to Domain companies in the eyes of the general public, it might. As far as the US public is concerned, GoDaddy is the only entity.  Adding a new player in the market with a similar brand (Sexy Women/images, Funny Ads) dilutes both of their messages and more importantly makes them look like a copycat.  The use of Danika Patrick or Pamela Anderson is really of little consequense. Danika has Sports Racing chops and Pamela has TV and &quot;Sexy&quot; fame.  It helps to shape the content but the message is the same.  Pamela&#039;s more widespread fame just helps CrazyDomains get associated with Sexy in a more tangable way.

The point I was trying to make relating to using sex to sell to &quot;Business Solutions&quot; (CrazyDomains)vs. a more general, broad message of &quot;Go here to get your cheap domain&quot; (GoDaddy) is strictly a what works better to that audience.  Yes Business decision makers are also members of a mass audience but this kind of message makes it hard to put that business message into context. 

Let’s also not kid ourselves. Using sex to sell is more about the shock value than pulling at people&#039;s heart(?!?) strings.  Other countries are just more progressive about allowing it on tv and in public discourse. That is why humor is the primary platform.

All that being said, it could work for them if they are aggressive about promoting themselves, but that could work regardless of who their spokesperson is or if they went after a non-sexy message.  If they just want to capture Australia and other non-GoDaddy markets, the question is moot. Just feel like if they were to invest that kind of $$, might have been able to carve out a better, and much bigger, chunk of the audiences attention if they went in a different direction.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alan:  </p>
<p>My comments are only directed as an overall comment if they were to try to break into the US market with advertising, much like GoDaddy did. I have no idea if they want to stick with Australia only and what the advertising market looks like as it related to sex in Australia. </p>
<p>I will also grant that two companies does not an industry make, but when it comes to Domain companies in the eyes of the general public, it might. As far as the US public is concerned, GoDaddy is the only entity.  Adding a new player in the market with a similar brand (Sexy Women/images, Funny Ads) dilutes both of their messages and more importantly makes them look like a copycat.  The use of Danika Patrick or Pamela Anderson is really of little consequense. Danika has Sports Racing chops and Pamela has TV and &#8220;Sexy&#8221; fame.  It helps to shape the content but the message is the same.  Pamela&#8217;s more widespread fame just helps CrazyDomains get associated with Sexy in a more tangable way.</p>
<p>The point I was trying to make relating to using sex to sell to &#8220;Business Solutions&#8221; (CrazyDomains)vs. a more general, broad message of &#8220;Go here to get your cheap domain&#8221; (GoDaddy) is strictly a what works better to that audience.  Yes Business decision makers are also members of a mass audience but this kind of message makes it hard to put that business message into context. </p>
<p>Let’s also not kid ourselves. Using sex to sell is more about the shock value than pulling at people&#8217;s heart(?!?) strings.  Other countries are just more progressive about allowing it on tv and in public discourse. That is why humor is the primary platform.</p>
<p>All that being said, it could work for them if they are aggressive about promoting themselves, but that could work regardless of who their spokesperson is or if they went after a non-sexy message.  If they just want to capture Australia and other non-GoDaddy markets, the question is moot. Just feel like if they were to invest that kind of $$, might have been able to carve out a better, and much bigger, chunk of the audiences attention if they went in a different direction.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2009/12/15/move-over-danica-pamela-anderson-is-newest-domain-name-spokesperson-in-commercial-for-crazydomains-yes-you-can-watch-it-here/comment-page-1/#comment-23728</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 15:22:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=6561#comment-23728</guid>
		<description>Funny - see, I have no idea about this sport except the cars go fast :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Funny &#8211; see, I have no idea about this sport except the cars go fast <img src='http://www.thedomains.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

