<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Test To Trick Search Engines Convinces A Credit Union To Buy More Domains</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thedomains.com/2009/12/09/a-test-to-trick-search-engines-convinces-a-credit-union-to-buy-more-domains/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2009/12/09/a-test-to-trick-search-engines-convinces-a-credit-union-to-buy-more-domains/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 20:38:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fejk bank-domän rankar förbi originalet &#124; Björn</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2009/12/09/a-test-to-trick-search-engines-convinces-a-credit-union-to-buy-more-domains/comment-page-1/#comment-23473</link>
		<dc:creator>Fejk bank-domän rankar förbi originalet &#124; Björn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 09:59:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=6482#comment-23473</guid>
		<description>[...] Källor: DotWeekly TheDomains Tagged as: Domäner, SEO No Comments    Comments (0) Trackbacks (0) ( subscribe to comments on this post ) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Källor: DotWeekly TheDomains Tagged as: Domäner, SEO No Comments    Comments (0) Trackbacks (0) ( subscribe to comments on this post ) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Search Engines &#8211; search engine submit &#124; Point Article News Feed</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2009/12/09/a-test-to-trick-search-engines-convinces-a-credit-union-to-buy-more-domains/comment-page-1/#comment-23416</link>
		<dc:creator>Search Engines &#8211; search engine submit &#124; Point Article News Feed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 08:13:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=6482#comment-23416</guid>
		<description>[...] A Test To Trick Search Engines Convinces A Credit Union To Buy &#8230;13 hours ago by MHB &#160;A Test To Trick Search Engines Convinces A Credit Union To Buy More Domains. 2009 December 9. by MHB. According to story in the AP, a new study by security researcher Jim Stickley shows how even search engines can get tricked into &#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] A Test To Trick Search Engines Convinces A Credit Union To Buy &#8230;13 hours ago by MHB &nbsp;A Test To Trick Search Engines Convinces A Credit Union To Buy More Domains. 2009 December 9. by MHB. According to story in the AP, a new study by security researcher Jim Stickley shows how even search engines can get tricked into &#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ngoc</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2009/12/09/a-test-to-trick-search-engines-convinces-a-credit-union-to-buy-more-domains/comment-page-1/#comment-23388</link>
		<dc:creator>Ngoc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 23:06:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=6482#comment-23388</guid>
		<description>Google&#039;s algorithm is pretty simple.  
Yahoo and Bing haven&#039;t figured it out....

Its called &quot;human bots&quot;, basically Google bot does a search/queries every so and so, compiles the data.  The human bot goes in take a look at sites, sees things, write comments and tell bots to &quot;fi this happens, do that&quot; etc., which is a way to perfect the system.  Every so and so, the bot goes back to the human bot for &quot;approval&quot; if a situation happens.  

Which is why Google is so &quot;precise&quot; unlike yahoo and bing.  They haven&#039;t figured that out.  Its called process refinement, using a number of combinations of human and bots, repeated forever to get the best results.  

Common Microsoft, Yahoo, with billions of dollars...should actually hire teams of people to be human bots.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google&#8217;s algorithm is pretty simple.<br />
Yahoo and Bing haven&#8217;t figured it out&#8230;.</p>
<p>Its called &#8220;human bots&#8221;, basically Google bot does a search/queries every so and so, compiles the data.  The human bot goes in take a look at sites, sees things, write comments and tell bots to &#8220;fi this happens, do that&#8221; etc., which is a way to perfect the system.  Every so and so, the bot goes back to the human bot for &#8220;approval&#8221; if a situation happens.  </p>
<p>Which is why Google is so &#8220;precise&#8221; unlike yahoo and bing.  They haven&#8217;t figured that out.  Its called process refinement, using a number of combinations of human and bots, repeated forever to get the best results.  </p>
<p>Common Microsoft, Yahoo, with billions of dollars&#8230;should actually hire teams of people to be human bots.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jamie Zoch</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2009/12/09/a-test-to-trick-search-engines-convinces-a-credit-union-to-buy-more-domains/comment-page-1/#comment-23386</link>
		<dc:creator>Jamie Zoch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 20:38:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=6482#comment-23386</guid>
		<description>@Erica,
The test was 1.5 years long and clearly Google would rank a 1.5 year old domain on P1. My blog is around 2 years old and ranks all over the place in Google, including many #1 spots and P1 spots.

I often see domain / sites rank well on Yahoo or Bing and poorly on Google and reversed, with also see many sites rank well on Google and poorly on Bing and Yahoo.

I personally put more of my focus to rank well on Google due to their higher share of the search market.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Erica,<br />
The test was 1.5 years long and clearly Google would rank a 1.5 year old domain on P1. My blog is around 2 years old and ranks all over the place in Google, including many #1 spots and P1 spots.</p>
<p>I often see domain / sites rank well on Yahoo or Bing and poorly on Google and reversed, with also see many sites rank well on Google and poorly on Bing and Yahoo.</p>
<p>I personally put more of my focus to rank well on Google due to their higher share of the search market.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erica Douglass</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2009/12/09/a-test-to-trick-search-engines-convinces-a-credit-union-to-buy-more-domains/comment-page-1/#comment-23382</link>
		<dc:creator>Erica Douglass</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 19:46:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=6482#comment-23382</guid>
		<description>Google leans heavily on when the domain was registered, and doesn&#039;t rank new domains highly for a period of at least a few months. Sounds like Bing and Yahoo don&#039;t have this same algorithm.

-Erica</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google leans heavily on when the domain was registered, and doesn&#8217;t rank new domains highly for a period of at least a few months. Sounds like Bing and Yahoo don&#8217;t have this same algorithm.</p>
<p>-Erica</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

