<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Comment Period On New gTLD Guidebook V3 Closes Today</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thedomains.com/2009/11/22/comment-period-on-new-gtld-guidebook-v3-closes-today/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2009/11/22/comment-period-on-new-gtld-guidebook-v3-closes-today/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 00:38:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Heereoth</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2009/11/22/comment-period-on-new-gtld-guidebook-v3-closes-today/comment-page-1/#comment-23507</link>
		<dc:creator>Heereoth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 22:07:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=6265#comment-23507</guid>
		<description>yo.. bookmarked thoughts ))</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yo.. bookmarked thoughts ))</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed Muller</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2009/11/22/comment-period-on-new-gtld-guidebook-v3-closes-today/comment-page-1/#comment-22679</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed Muller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 16:18:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=6265#comment-22679</guid>
		<description>Some of the notable contributors included  Yahoo! Inc., Demand Media, GoDaddy, AT&amp;T, IBM, Visa and Nokia, most of them looking at TM protection. I haven&#039;t taken the time to filter through all the comments yet though.

http://namemon.com/contributions/41-icann/94-icann-draft-for-new-gtlds</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some of the notable contributors included  Yahoo! Inc., Demand Media, GoDaddy, AT&amp;T, IBM, Visa and Nokia, most of them looking at TM protection. I haven&#8217;t taken the time to filter through all the comments yet though.</p>
<p><a href="http://namemon.com/contributions/41-icann/94-icann-draft-for-new-gtlds" rel="nofollow">http://namemon.com/contributions/41-icann/94-icann-draft-for-new-gtlds</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Kirikos</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2009/11/22/comment-period-on-new-gtld-guidebook-v3-closes-today/comment-page-1/#comment-22659</link>
		<dc:creator>George Kirikos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 23:24:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=6265#comment-22659</guid>
		<description>I added one more comment (hopefully my final one) to take the registrars to task over one of their comments (see the comment in the archives with the subject &quot;Registrar Stakeholder Group arguments also apply even more to *Registrants&quot;).

The *registrars* went out of their way to object to 7.2(f) of the draft agreement which would allow ICANN to unilaterally change the fees charged to *registries*. Hello?? Shouldn&#039;t the *registrars* use the exact same argument on behalf of their clients, i.e. *registrants*, to ensure that registry operators can&#039;t jack up renewal fees?

It&#039;s clear that the registrar constituency is captured by those who are wanna-be registry operators! Folks should see red when they see registrars taking the side of the registries, instead of taking the position of protecting their clients from the same abuse.

The registrars who want to gouge their clients in the future, if/when they become registry operators themselves, should join the registry constituency as observers, instead of making such a foolish statement on behalf of the registrars.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I added one more comment (hopefully my final one) to take the registrars to task over one of their comments (see the comment in the archives with the subject &#8220;Registrar Stakeholder Group arguments also apply even more to *Registrants&#8221;).</p>
<p>The *registrars* went out of their way to object to 7.2(f) of the draft agreement which would allow ICANN to unilaterally change the fees charged to *registries*. Hello?? Shouldn&#8217;t the *registrars* use the exact same argument on behalf of their clients, i.e. *registrants*, to ensure that registry operators can&#8217;t jack up renewal fees?</p>
<p>It&#8217;s clear that the registrar constituency is captured by those who are wanna-be registry operators! Folks should see red when they see registrars taking the side of the registries, instead of taking the position of protecting their clients from the same abuse.</p>
<p>The registrars who want to gouge their clients in the future, if/when they become registry operators themselves, should join the registry constituency as observers, instead of making such a foolish statement on behalf of the registrars.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BullS</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2009/11/22/comment-period-on-new-gtld-guidebook-v3-closes-today/comment-page-1/#comment-22657</link>
		<dc:creator>BullS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 22:37:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=6265#comment-22657</guid>
		<description>Georgie...I know where you are coming from.

Anyway, it is all about the bottom line $$$$$-

Given the chance,ICANN can and will  steal the shirt off your back, and they will!!!without a doubt.

Ask anyone on the street who/what ICAAN does?Heck , nobody will know.

So why do we need ICAAN anyway?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Georgie&#8230;I know where you are coming from.</p>
<p>Anyway, it is all about the bottom line $$$$$-</p>
<p>Given the chance,ICANN can and will  steal the shirt off your back, and they will!!!without a doubt.</p>
<p>Ask anyone on the street who/what ICAAN does?Heck , nobody will know.</p>
<p>So why do we need ICAAN anyway?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Kirikos</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2009/11/22/comment-period-on-new-gtld-guidebook-v3-closes-today/comment-page-1/#comment-22656</link>
		<dc:creator>George Kirikos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 22:23:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=6265#comment-22656</guid>
		<description>BullS: You&#039;ve not been following the polls --- Obama&#039;s approval level has fallen below 50%. Irregardless of the polls, even Obama isn&#039;t advocating communism or Marxism (i.e. even Warren Buffett is a Democrat). Socialism is more about an argument over what is the appropriate size of the social safety net (healthcare, childcare, etc.), but the means of production are still generally owned by the private sector (they&#039;re just taxed like crazy!). Ask someone in China or Russia whether they&#039;d like to go back to the old ways, and I think you&#039;ll see that capitalism might be &quot;bad&quot; in some people&#039;s eyes, but every alternative is far worse.

And just go back on topic, I added a new comment in the comments archive (link above in the main article) that highlighted how ICANN is going to waste millions of dollars on Rod Beckstrom&#039;s new office space in Palo Alto. How many new gTLDs will ICANN have to approve in order to pay for his fancy new digs and entourage? With California&#039;s unemployment rate above 10%, and firms like AOL and Adobe cutting staff, ICANN is going in the opposite direction and increasing their profligate spending.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BullS: You&#8217;ve not been following the polls &#8212; Obama&#8217;s approval level has fallen below 50%. Irregardless of the polls, even Obama isn&#8217;t advocating communism or Marxism (i.e. even Warren Buffett is a Democrat). Socialism is more about an argument over what is the appropriate size of the social safety net (healthcare, childcare, etc.), but the means of production are still generally owned by the private sector (they&#8217;re just taxed like crazy!). Ask someone in China or Russia whether they&#8217;d like to go back to the old ways, and I think you&#8217;ll see that capitalism might be &#8220;bad&#8221; in some people&#8217;s eyes, but every alternative is far worse.</p>
<p>And just go back on topic, I added a new comment in the comments archive (link above in the main article) that highlighted how ICANN is going to waste millions of dollars on Rod Beckstrom&#8217;s new office space in Palo Alto. How many new gTLDs will ICANN have to approve in order to pay for his fancy new digs and entourage? With California&#8217;s unemployment rate above 10%, and firms like AOL and Adobe cutting staff, ICANN is going in the opposite direction and increasing their profligate spending.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BullS</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2009/11/22/comment-period-on-new-gtld-guidebook-v3-closes-today/comment-page-1/#comment-22655</link>
		<dc:creator>BullS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 22:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=6265#comment-22655</guid>
		<description>My Goodness George...calm down....

Enjoy as much &quot;capitalism &quot; you want, but I think the mood is swinging towards Obama&#039;s socialism.

Rise to Marxism!!!

&quot;Marx argued that capitalism, like previous socioeconomic systems, will inevitably produce internal tensions which will lead to its destruction&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My Goodness George&#8230;calm down&#8230;.</p>
<p>Enjoy as much &#8220;capitalism &#8221; you want, but I think the mood is swinging towards Obama&#8217;s socialism.</p>
<p>Rise to Marxism!!!</p>
<p>&#8220;Marx argued that capitalism, like previous socioeconomic systems, will inevitably produce internal tensions which will lead to its destruction&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Kirikos</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2009/11/22/comment-period-on-new-gtld-guidebook-v3-closes-today/comment-page-1/#comment-22653</link>
		<dc:creator>George Kirikos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 22:02:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=6265#comment-22653</guid>
		<description>BullS: Why not do the same with parking lots? Or, perhaps you think that your neighbour&#039;s house isn&#039;t big enough, and you&#039;d like to tear it down and replace it with a McMansion?

As long as folks are paying their renewal fees, they can use their domain names any which way they please. Take a look at where Juice.com goes, for example. If you don&#039;t like how Microsoft is using it, there&#039;s a solution --- go buy it from. The market will dictate its value.

Private property is just that -- private. People feeling that they have entitlement to someone else&#039;s assets because they feel they know better how to use them are advocates of communism, where private ownership doesn&#039;t exist, but instead assets are owned by the community. History has demonstrated that&#039;s a far less efficient mechanism of allocating scarce economic resources than the capitalist society we live in.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BullS: Why not do the same with parking lots? Or, perhaps you think that your neighbour&#8217;s house isn&#8217;t big enough, and you&#8217;d like to tear it down and replace it with a McMansion?</p>
<p>As long as folks are paying their renewal fees, they can use their domain names any which way they please. Take a look at where Juice.com goes, for example. If you don&#8217;t like how Microsoft is using it, there&#8217;s a solution &#8212; go buy it from. The market will dictate its value.</p>
<p>Private property is just that &#8212; private. People feeling that they have entitlement to someone else&#8217;s assets because they feel they know better how to use them are advocates of communism, where private ownership doesn&#8217;t exist, but instead assets are owned by the community. History has demonstrated that&#8217;s a far less efficient mechanism of allocating scarce economic resources than the capitalist society we live in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BullS</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2009/11/22/comment-period-on-new-gtld-guidebook-v3-closes-today/comment-page-1/#comment-22652</link>
		<dc:creator>BullS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 21:07:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=6265#comment-22652</guid>
		<description>I would love to see a law that states that if you do not develop your domain within 3 yrs, then your domains will just died.

Get rid of parking companies- they just take your money anyway.

Register the domains-develop them or you  lose them!!

The site got to be up and running for 3 yrs.

Good idea?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would love to see a law that states that if you do not develop your domain within 3 yrs, then your domains will just died.</p>
<p>Get rid of parking companies- they just take your money anyway.</p>
<p>Register the domains-develop them or you  lose them!!</p>
<p>The site got to be up and running for 3 yrs.</p>
<p>Good idea?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MHB</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2009/11/22/comment-period-on-new-gtld-guidebook-v3-closes-today/comment-page-1/#comment-22649</link>
		<dc:creator>MHB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 19:01:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=6265#comment-22649</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think those at ICANN are a sleep at the wheel.

I think ICANN has a plan to increase their revenue by many fold and are continuing to implement it.

Registries and those seeking to become registries are pushing for their interests as hard as possible through this process.

The only ones a sleep at the wheel are domain holders who have been by in large silent on the issue although they have the most to lose if some of these provisions are finalized.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think those at ICANN are a sleep at the wheel.</p>
<p>I think ICANN has a plan to increase their revenue by many fold and are continuing to implement it.</p>
<p>Registries and those seeking to become registries are pushing for their interests as hard as possible through this process.</p>
<p>The only ones a sleep at the wheel are domain holders who have been by in large silent on the issue although they have the most to lose if some of these provisions are finalized.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jeff</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2009/11/22/comment-period-on-new-gtld-guidebook-v3-closes-today/comment-page-1/#comment-22646</link>
		<dc:creator>jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 18:21:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=6265#comment-22646</guid>
		<description>Thank goodness we have George always helping us out... Too bad everyone at ICANN is asleep at the wheel and traveling while claiming to be non profit.. ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank goodness we have George always helping us out&#8230; Too bad everyone at ICANN is asleep at the wheel and traveling while claiming to be non profit.. <img src='http://www.thedomains.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
