<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Attempted Domain Theft By Trademark Fails In WIPO: Project.me</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thedomains.com/2009/11/13/attempted-domain-theft-by-trademark-fails-in-wipo-project-me/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2009/11/13/attempted-domain-theft-by-trademark-fails-in-wipo-project-me/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 20:38:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: MHB</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2009/11/13/attempted-domain-theft-by-trademark-fails-in-wipo-project-me/comment-page-1/#comment-23663</link>
		<dc:creator>MHB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 01:29:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=6171#comment-23663</guid>
		<description>Kia

I do not know of any jurisdiction that granted the winner attorney fees automatically by right.

You need to consult with an attorney to figure out your rights</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kia</p>
<p>I do not know of any jurisdiction that granted the winner attorney fees automatically by right.</p>
<p>You need to consult with an attorney to figure out your rights</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kia Foster</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2009/11/13/attempted-domain-theft-by-trademark-fails-in-wipo-project-me/comment-page-1/#comment-23652</link>
		<dc:creator>Kia Foster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 21:23:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=6171#comment-23652</guid>
		<description>Does anyone know a Jurisdiction where each party bear their own costs,win or lose ?.  I want to find a Jurisdiction where I can issue an injunction as soon as someone issues a UDRP and then have the matter heard outside of WIPO rules .  Anyone know ?.

Thanks

Kia</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does anyone know a Jurisdiction where each party bear their own costs,win or lose ?.  I want to find a Jurisdiction where I can issue an injunction as soon as someone issues a UDRP and then have the matter heard outside of WIPO rules .  Anyone know ?.</p>
<p>Thanks</p>
<p>Kia</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anmue</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2009/11/13/attempted-domain-theft-by-trademark-fails-in-wipo-project-me/comment-page-1/#comment-22752</link>
		<dc:creator>anmue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 16:43:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=6171#comment-22752</guid>
		<description>MHB

Thanks, that you point this out. Some of the previous speakers were talking about stealing a domain.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MHB</p>
<p>Thanks, that you point this out. Some of the previous speakers were talking about stealing a domain.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MHB</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2009/11/13/attempted-domain-theft-by-trademark-fails-in-wipo-project-me/comment-page-1/#comment-22751</link>
		<dc:creator>MHB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 16:13:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=6171#comment-22751</guid>
		<description>Anmue


&quot;&quot;&quot;
Mr. Howard was not able to contend an yrights or legitimate interests in the domain name. Due to the fact that Mr. Howards argumentation was almost completely focussed on attesting the legal rights it is incomprehensible what you guys congratulate about.&quot;&quot;&quot;


Of course we are talking about each parties legal rights, its a legal proceeding.

Forming a company anywhere is the world does not give that company the right to a domain name plain and simple.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anmue</p>
<p>&#8220;&#8221;"<br />
Mr. Howard was not able to contend an yrights or legitimate interests in the domain name. Due to the fact that Mr. Howards argumentation was almost completely focussed on attesting the legal rights it is incomprehensible what you guys congratulate about.&#8221;"&#8221;</p>
<p>Of course we are talking about each parties legal rights, its a legal proceeding.</p>
<p>Forming a company anywhere is the world does not give that company the right to a domain name plain and simple.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anmue</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2009/11/13/attempted-domain-theft-by-trademark-fails-in-wipo-project-me/comment-page-1/#comment-22747</link>
		<dc:creator>anmue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 15:38:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=6171#comment-22747</guid>
		<description>Unfortunately you guys do only read the facts you want to read. The company project.me was founded BEFORE the domain has been registered. The purpose of registering the trademark project.me was to protect the name of the company. Also if you&#039;d read carefully and unbiassed the panel&#039;s decision you should have taken notice of two things:
A. The domain name is similar to the project.me trademark (and the company name)
B. Mr. Howard was not able to contend an yrights or legitimate interests in the domain name. Due to the fact that Mr. Howards argumentation was almost completely focussed on attesting the legal rights it is incomprehensible what you guys congratulate about.

Unfortunately the panel did not follow the complainant&#039;s argumentation that registering a domain for the purpose of making money IS bad faith per se. 

Think about it… or continue celebrating yourself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unfortunately you guys do only read the facts you want to read. The company project.me was founded BEFORE the domain has been registered. The purpose of registering the trademark project.me was to protect the name of the company. Also if you&#8217;d read carefully and unbiassed the panel&#8217;s decision you should have taken notice of two things:<br />
A. The domain name is similar to the project.me trademark (and the company name)<br />
B. Mr. Howard was not able to contend an yrights or legitimate interests in the domain name. Due to the fact that Mr. Howards argumentation was almost completely focussed on attesting the legal rights it is incomprehensible what you guys congratulate about.</p>
<p>Unfortunately the panel did not follow the complainant&#8217;s argumentation that registering a domain for the purpose of making money IS bad faith per se. </p>
<p>Think about it… or continue celebrating yourself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brands-and-Jingles</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2009/11/13/attempted-domain-theft-by-trademark-fails-in-wipo-project-me/comment-page-1/#comment-22437</link>
		<dc:creator>Brands-and-Jingles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 23:15:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=6171#comment-22437</guid>
		<description>Funny enough, sometimes there are dozens of the same trademarks registered in the same country. It is such a mess. That idea of &quot;stealing&quot; the domain is not new. Some people pay big bucks for silly domains [0], some pay big bucks for silly trademarks.

[0] http://dot-me.of-cour.se/2008/10/24/porsche/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Funny enough, sometimes there are dozens of the same trademarks registered in the same country. It is such a mess. That idea of &#8220;stealing&#8221; the domain is not new. Some people pay big bucks for silly domains [0], some pay big bucks for silly trademarks.</p>
<p>[0] <a href="http://dot-me.of-cour.se/2008/10/24/porsche/" rel="nofollow">http://dot-me.of-cour.se/2008/10/24/porsche/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Attempted Domain Theft By Trademark Fails In WIPO: Project.me - DNForum - Domain Sales, Domain Forum, Domain Appraisals, Domain Registrars</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2009/11/13/attempted-domain-theft-by-trademark-fails-in-wipo-project-me/comment-page-1/#comment-22390</link>
		<dc:creator>Attempted Domain Theft By Trademark Fails In WIPO: Project.me - DNForum - Domain Sales, Domain Forum, Domain Appraisals, Domain Registrars</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 23:20:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=6171#comment-22390</guid>
		<description>[...] Domain Theft By Trademark Fails In WIPO: Project.me   http://www.thedomains.com/2009/11/13...omment-page-1/  .Me Domains are [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Domain Theft By Trademark Fails In WIPO: Project.me   <a href="http://www.thedomains.com/2009/11/13...omment-page-1/" rel="nofollow">http://www.thedomains.com/2009/11/13&#8230;omment-page-1/</a>  .Me Domains are [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Attempted Domain Theft By Trademark Fails In WIPO: Project.me - DNForum - Domain Sales, Domain Forum, Domain Appraisals, Domain Registrars</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2009/11/13/attempted-domain-theft-by-trademark-fails-in-wipo-project-me/comment-page-1/#comment-22389</link>
		<dc:creator>Attempted Domain Theft By Trademark Fails In WIPO: Project.me - DNForum - Domain Sales, Domain Forum, Domain Appraisals, Domain Registrars</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 23:18:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=6171#comment-22389</guid>
		<description>[...] Attempted Domain Theft By Trademark Fails In WIPO: Project.me   http://www.thedomains.com/2009/11/13...omment-page-1/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Attempted Domain Theft By Trademark Fails In WIPO: Project.me   <a href="http://www.thedomains.com/2009/11/13...omment-page-1/" rel="nofollow">http://www.thedomains.com/2009/11/13&#8230;omment-page-1/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: .ME The .ME Discussion and Showcase - Page 174 - NamePros.com</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2009/11/13/attempted-domain-theft-by-trademark-fails-in-wipo-project-me/comment-page-1/#comment-22388</link>
		<dc:creator>.ME The .ME Discussion and Showcase - Page 174 - NamePros.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 23:16:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=6171#comment-22388</guid>
		<description>[...] Attempted Domain Theft By Trademark Fails In WIPO: Project.me &#124; The Domains [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Attempted Domain Theft By Trademark Fails In WIPO: Project.me | The Domains [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2009/11/13/attempted-domain-theft-by-trademark-fails-in-wipo-project-me/comment-page-1/#comment-22302</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 08:56:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=6171#comment-22302</guid>
		<description>Way to go Howard! Nice work!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Way to go Howard! Nice work!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

