<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: HitWise: Bing Up 7% In October: Long Searches Up 4%</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thedomains.com/2009/11/11/hitwise-bing-up-7-in-october-long-searches-up-4/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2009/11/11/hitwise-bing-up-7-in-october-long-searches-up-4/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 20:38:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Davids</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2009/11/11/hitwise-bing-up-7-in-october-long-searches-up-4/comment-page-1/#comment-22168</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Davids</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 14:40:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=6130#comment-22168</guid>
		<description>LSM... Or they will just go to zappos :)

The smart peeps in the next ten years will make zappos type sites out of their great domains</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LSM&#8230; Or they will just go to zappos <img src='http://www.thedomains.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>The smart peeps in the next ten years will make zappos type sites out of their great domains</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HitWise: Bing Up 7% In October: Long Searches Up 4% &#124; The Domains &#124; ArtykułyNet</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2009/11/11/hitwise-bing-up-7-in-october-long-searches-up-4/comment-page-1/#comment-22163</link>
		<dc:creator>HitWise: Bing Up 7% In October: Long Searches Up 4% &#124; The Domains &#124; ArtykułyNet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 09:32:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=6130#comment-22163</guid>
		<description>[...] the original post here: HitWise: Bing Up 7% In October: Long Searches Up 4% &#124; The Domains    Kontynuuj czytanie &#187; &#124;&#124; Napisał dnia: 12.11.09. &#124;&#124; Tagi:auctions, Domains, parking-stock, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the original post here: HitWise: Bing Up 7% In October: Long Searches Up 4% | The Domains    Kontynuuj czytanie &#187; || Napisał dnia: 12.11.09. || Tagi:auctions, Domains, parking-stock, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LS Morgan</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2009/11/11/hitwise-bing-up-7-in-october-long-searches-up-4/comment-page-1/#comment-22159</link>
		<dc:creator>LS Morgan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 06:44:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=6130#comment-22159</guid>
		<description>As web users grow more and more sophisticated, utilization of longtail will increase right with them.

In another decade, we will have a generation of people entering their earning years who haven&#039;t lived a single day of their lives without internet. When these people search for shoes, they don&#039;t search for &quot;shoes&quot; like folks did in 1999. 

Succinctness has fantastic branding gravity and works great in non-web based promo campaigns, but as long as SE algos continue to weigh relative keyword purity in the domain, it&#039;s entirely possible that longer-tail keyword names and their built-in &#039;filtering&#039; capacity might be better- in some circumstances- than shorter, more generic strings.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As web users grow more and more sophisticated, utilization of longtail will increase right with them.</p>
<p>In another decade, we will have a generation of people entering their earning years who haven&#8217;t lived a single day of their lives without internet. When these people search for shoes, they don&#8217;t search for &#8220;shoes&#8221; like folks did in 1999. </p>
<p>Succinctness has fantastic branding gravity and works great in non-web based promo campaigns, but as long as SE algos continue to weigh relative keyword purity in the domain, it&#8217;s entirely possible that longer-tail keyword names and their built-in &#8216;filtering&#8217; capacity might be better- in some circumstances- than shorter, more generic strings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2009/11/11/hitwise-bing-up-7-in-october-long-searches-up-4/comment-page-1/#comment-22157</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 03:36:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=6130#comment-22157</guid>
		<description>The chart I think should show % gain / loss from 1 month compared to the other, not on a whole. That&#039;s why it got me confused.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The chart I think should show % gain / loss from 1 month compared to the other, not on a whole. That&#8217;s why it got me confused.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2009/11/11/hitwise-bing-up-7-in-october-long-searches-up-4/comment-page-1/#comment-22156</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 03:33:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=6130#comment-22156</guid>
		<description>Durrrr lol</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Durrrr lol</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2009/11/11/hitwise-bing-up-7-in-october-long-searches-up-4/comment-page-1/#comment-22155</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 03:32:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=6130#comment-22155</guid>
		<description>Oh right snicksnack. ;) That makes sense now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh right snicksnack. <img src='http://www.thedomains.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' />  That makes sense now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: snicksnack</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2009/11/11/hitwise-bing-up-7-in-october-long-searches-up-4/comment-page-1/#comment-22154</link>
		<dc:creator>snicksnack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 03:25:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=6130#comment-22154</guid>
		<description>The change percentage in each row is calculated on a different base.

-1% of 24.32 is different from +1% of 13.69</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The change percentage in each row is calculated on a different base.</p>
<p>-1% of 24.32 is different from +1% of 13.69</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MHB</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2009/11/11/hitwise-bing-up-7-in-october-long-searches-up-4/comment-page-1/#comment-22152</link>
		<dc:creator>MHB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 03:07:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=6130#comment-22152</guid>
		<description>Matt

These don&#039;t have to even out

Some categories gained others lost but they don&#039;t have to equal out</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Matt</p>
<p>These don&#8217;t have to even out</p>
<p>Some categories gained others lost but they don&#8217;t have to equal out</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2009/11/11/hitwise-bing-up-7-in-october-long-searches-up-4/comment-page-1/#comment-22151</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 03:01:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=6130#comment-22151</guid>
		<description>It might be me, but I do not understand this chart. It could be just late here and my brain not functioning, but how do you have 14% gain on the different word lengths, and only 3% loss? Where is the other 11% coming from?

Am I reading this wrong?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It might be me, but I do not understand this chart. It could be just late here and my brain not functioning, but how do you have 14% gain on the different word lengths, and only 3% loss? Where is the other 11% coming from?</p>
<p>Am I reading this wrong?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

