<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Yellowstone.org Sells For $13K on NameJet.com</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thedomains.com/2009/11/01/yellowstone-org-sells-for-13k-on-namejet-com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2009/11/01/yellowstone-org-sells-for-13k-on-namejet-com/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 23:30:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Free Domain Newsletter</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2009/11/01/yellowstone-org-sells-for-13k-on-namejet-com/comment-page-1/#comment-21642</link>
		<dc:creator>Free Domain Newsletter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 15:02:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=5954#comment-21642</guid>
		<description>&quot;the Yellowstone Park isn’t Las Vegas and there aren’t as many “Yellowstone Parks” as insurance companies, so, two sites for one park, are more than enough for this niche market&quot;

You have got to be kidding me. This park gets over 3 million visitors a year.
3300 searches a day according to Keyword Discovery is quite a niche. If you know of any other &quot;niches&quot; with 100,000 searches per month and only two main sites please let me know as obviously it will be of no good to you.=)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;the Yellowstone Park isn’t Las Vegas and there aren’t as many “Yellowstone Parks” as insurance companies, so, two sites for one park, are more than enough for this niche market&#8221;</p>
<p>You have got to be kidding me. This park gets over 3 million visitors a year.<br />
3300 searches a day according to Keyword Discovery is quite a niche. If you know of any other &#8220;niches&#8221; with 100,000 searches per month and only two main sites please let me know as obviously it will be of no good to you.=)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 100 Domains Club</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2009/11/01/yellowstone-org-sells-for-13k-on-namejet-com/comment-page-1/#comment-21636</link>
		<dc:creator>100 Domains Club</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 04:05:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=5954#comment-21636</guid>
		<description>the Yellowstone Park isn&#039;t Las Vegas and there aren&#039;t as many &quot;Yellowstone Parks&quot; as insurance companies, so, two sites for one park, are more than enough for this niche market</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the Yellowstone Park isn&#8217;t Las Vegas and there aren&#8217;t as many &#8220;Yellowstone Parks&#8221; as insurance companies, so, two sites for one park, are more than enough for this niche market</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hosting Offers</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2009/11/01/yellowstone-org-sells-for-13k-on-namejet-com/comment-page-1/#comment-21635</link>
		<dc:creator>Hosting Offers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 04:03:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=5954#comment-21635</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s nice to see a .org fetch a healthy sum like that, 
.org&#039;s have been selling like hotcakes recently

i believe the reasons for it are

1.  people are getting smarter, 
2. they realize that .org is a recognized and respected extension
3. they see more value in a short &amp; easy to remember .org domains 
4. who wants to type in a 3-4 word .com domain or some gibberish just to reach a website, especially on an iphone or blackberry

5. oh yes and SEO value for exact matches
6.  much more affordable,
7.   people selling .org domains are more open to do businessman</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s nice to see a .org fetch a healthy sum like that,<br />
.org&#8217;s have been selling like hotcakes recently</p>
<p>i believe the reasons for it are</p>
<p>1.  people are getting smarter,<br />
2. they realize that .org is a recognized and respected extension<br />
3. they see more value in a short &amp; easy to remember .org domains<br />
4. who wants to type in a 3-4 word .com domain or some gibberish just to reach a website, especially on an iphone or blackberry</p>
<p>5. oh yes and SEO value for exact matches<br />
6.  much more affordable,<br />
7.   people selling .org domains are more open to do businessman</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Free Domain Newsletter</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2009/11/01/yellowstone-org-sells-for-13k-on-namejet-com/comment-page-1/#comment-21623</link>
		<dc:creator>Free Domain Newsletter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 15:04:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=5954#comment-21623</guid>
		<description>Sorry for calling you Miki, that was a typo Mike.

&quot;with two active sites for one park there is no need for a third site&quot;

???

Could you also say regarding Las Vegas:

&quot;with two active sites for one city there is no need for a third site&quot;

How about regarding insurance:

&quot;with two active sites for one industry there is no need for a third site&quot;

If I went by your logic I would still be waiting to make money online=)

With 150,000 searches a month for &quot;Yellowstone National Park&quot; someone can make some good money with a front page listing no matter how many competitors there are.

Your logic is very, very flawed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry for calling you Miki, that was a typo Mike.</p>
<p>&#8220;with two active sites for one park there is no need for a third site&#8221;</p>
<p>???</p>
<p>Could you also say regarding Las Vegas:</p>
<p>&#8220;with two active sites for one city there is no need for a third site&#8221;</p>
<p>How about regarding insurance:</p>
<p>&#8220;with two active sites for one industry there is no need for a third site&#8221;</p>
<p>If I went by your logic I would still be waiting to make money online=)</p>
<p>With 150,000 searches a month for &#8220;Yellowstone National Park&#8221; someone can make some good money with a front page listing no matter how many competitors there are.</p>
<p>Your logic is very, very flawed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 100 Domains Club</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2009/11/01/yellowstone-org-sells-for-13k-on-namejet-com/comment-page-1/#comment-21618</link>
		<dc:creator>100 Domains Club</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 06:25:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=5954#comment-21618</guid>
		<description>.

with two active sites for one park there is no need for a third site

.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>.</p>
<p>with two active sites for one park there is no need for a third site</p>
<p>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Troy</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2009/11/01/yellowstone-org-sells-for-13k-on-namejet-com/comment-page-1/#comment-21616</link>
		<dc:creator>Troy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 04:59:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=5954#comment-21616</guid>
		<description>This is not all that related or applicapable so forgive me for abousing your quality blog Miki but &quot;Yellowstone National Park&quot; gets about 50% more search engine searches than &quot;Yellowstone&quot; all alone and therefore in my somewhat limited opinion is a better domain.

I only say so because I recently bought YellowstoneNationalPark.net... lucky me, lucky me=)

Troy Hallewell</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is not all that related or applicapable so forgive me for abousing your quality blog Miki but &#8220;Yellowstone National Park&#8221; gets about 50% more search engine searches than &#8220;Yellowstone&#8221; all alone and therefore in my somewhat limited opinion is a better domain.</p>
<p>I only say so because I recently bought YellowstoneNationalPark.net&#8230; lucky me, lucky me=)</p>
<p>Troy Hallewell</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
