<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 3 Three Letter .Com&#8217;s To Drop Sunday</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thedomains.com/2009/10/17/3-three-letter-coms-to-drop-sunday/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2009/10/17/3-three-letter-coms-to-drop-sunday/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 20:38:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Short And Quick Domain News Video: Episode 1 &#124; ygrab.com</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2009/10/17/3-three-letter-coms-to-drop-sunday/comment-page-1/#comment-21194</link>
		<dc:creator>Short And Quick Domain News Video: Episode 1 &#124; ygrab.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 14:15:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=5770#comment-21194</guid>
		<description>[...] 3 Three Letter .Com’s To Drop Sunday &#8211; TheDomains.com [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 3 Three Letter .Com’s To Drop Sunday &#8211; TheDomains.com [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MHB</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2009/10/17/3-three-letter-coms-to-drop-sunday/comment-page-1/#comment-20922</link>
		<dc:creator>MHB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2009 21:04:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=5770#comment-20922</guid>
		<description>UPDATE

All three 3 letter.com discussed in the post did in fact drop today and all 3 were picked up by snapnames.

The auctions close on Wed at 3:15pm EST

Here are the current high prices:

icz.com		        $4,500.00

mcu.com		$3,606.00

wdy.com		$2,766.00</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>UPDATE</p>
<p>All three 3 letter.com discussed in the post did in fact drop today and all 3 were picked up by snapnames.</p>
<p>The auctions close on Wed at 3:15pm EST</p>
<p>Here are the current high prices:</p>
<p>icz.com		        $4,500.00</p>
<p>mcu.com		$3,606.00</p>
<p>wdy.com		$2,766.00</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MHB</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2009/10/17/3-three-letter-coms-to-drop-sunday/comment-page-1/#comment-20908</link>
		<dc:creator>MHB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2009 15:48:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=5770#comment-20908</guid>
		<description>&quot;&quot;&quot;Pool, Snapnames, Moniker, Network Solutions, Enom, Tucows, Godaddy, Dotster, etc are making millions from auctioning off something they really don’t own 35-40 days before the auction.&quot;&quot;

They have been doing this for years, and we have been writing about it for the 2 years we have been blogging.

Its because ICANN has refused to issue any uniform rules or regulations to mandate how expired domains should be handled and now believe that the money registrars  make off of expired domains are part of the &quot;secret sauce&quot; that keeps them very profitable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;&#8221;"Pool, Snapnames, Moniker, Network Solutions, Enom, Tucows, Godaddy, Dotster, etc are making millions from auctioning off something they really don’t own 35-40 days before the auction.&#8221;"</p>
<p>They have been doing this for years, and we have been writing about it for the 2 years we have been blogging.</p>
<p>Its because ICANN has refused to issue any uniform rules or regulations to mandate how expired domains should be handled and now believe that the money registrars  make off of expired domains are part of the &#8220;secret sauce&#8221; that keeps them very profitable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Domain Investor</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2009/10/17/3-three-letter-coms-to-drop-sunday/comment-page-1/#comment-20907</link>
		<dc:creator>Domain Investor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2009 15:08:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=5770#comment-20907</guid>
		<description>Incidently, this was suppose to be the correct cycle of deletion until the registrars figured out that they could &quot;grossly&quot; profit from the expiration of domains. 

Now, when a registrar auction offs a domain, their return on investment is off the charts.  The only cost is the $ 7. renewal fee.
Multiple that gross profit by 100&#039;s a day, 365 days a year.  

Pool, Snapnames, Moniker, Network Solutions, Enom, Tucows, Godaddy, Dotster, etc are making millions from auctioning off something they really don&#039;t own 35-40 days before the auction.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Incidently, this was suppose to be the correct cycle of deletion until the registrars figured out that they could &#8220;grossly&#8221; profit from the expiration of domains. </p>
<p>Now, when a registrar auction offs a domain, their return on investment is off the charts.  The only cost is the $ 7. renewal fee.<br />
Multiple that gross profit by 100&#8242;s a day, 365 days a year.  </p>
<p>Pool, Snapnames, Moniker, Network Solutions, Enom, Tucows, Godaddy, Dotster, etc are making millions from auctioning off something they really don&#8217;t own 35-40 days before the auction.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Domain Investor</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2009/10/17/3-three-letter-coms-to-drop-sunday/comment-page-1/#comment-20906</link>
		<dc:creator>Domain Investor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2009 14:57:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=5770#comment-20906</guid>
		<description>A registrar receives a refund of an automatic renewal payment if the domain is pushed into the delete cycle within 45 days of payment.

I don&#039;t believe these met that requirement.

Since, the 3 domains are with Netsol, why didn&#039;t they go thru Namejet where they would profit from the deletion?
There is more to this story that we don&#039;t know.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A registrar receives a refund of an automatic renewal payment if the domain is pushed into the delete cycle within 45 days of payment.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t believe these met that requirement.</p>
<p>Since, the 3 domains are with Netsol, why didn&#8217;t they go thru Namejet where they would profit from the deletion?<br />
There is more to this story that we don&#8217;t know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MHB</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2009/10/17/3-three-letter-coms-to-drop-sunday/comment-page-1/#comment-20905</link>
		<dc:creator>MHB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2009 14:39:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=5770#comment-20905</guid>
		<description>Domain

Also sometime the registrar itself just &quot;renews&quot; the domain internally but I agree once it hits pending delete you can no longer renew the domain or redeem the domain, these should drop</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Domain</p>
<p>Also sometime the registrar itself just &#8220;renews&#8221; the domain internally but I agree once it hits pending delete you can no longer renew the domain or redeem the domain, these should drop</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Domain Investor</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2009/10/17/3-three-letter-coms-to-drop-sunday/comment-page-1/#comment-20904</link>
		<dc:creator>Domain Investor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2009 14:20:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=5770#comment-20904</guid>
		<description>I believe once it says &quot;pending delete&quot; it can&#039;t be stopped by the registrar.  A registry can do whatever they want.

A registrar can delete a domain even if it has a renewal date in the future.

Some of the possible reasons -
Fraudulent renewal payment.
Domain owner request.
Incorrect whois.
Clerical error by registrar.
UDRP order.
and more.

I don&#039;t know about the 3 domains.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe once it says &#8220;pending delete&#8221; it can&#8217;t be stopped by the registrar.  A registry can do whatever they want.</p>
<p>A registrar can delete a domain even if it has a renewal date in the future.</p>
<p>Some of the possible reasons -<br />
Fraudulent renewal payment.<br />
Domain owner request.<br />
Incorrect whois.<br />
Clerical error by registrar.<br />
UDRP order.<br />
and more.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know about the 3 domains.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: marko</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2009/10/17/3-three-letter-coms-to-drop-sunday/comment-page-1/#comment-20901</link>
		<dc:creator>marko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2009 09:23:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=5770#comment-20901</guid>
		<description>a quick whois seems to show most have been renewed</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>a quick whois seems to show most have been renewed</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bugui</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2009/10/17/3-three-letter-coms-to-drop-sunday/comment-page-1/#comment-20900</link>
		<dc:creator>bugui</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2009 07:34:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=5770#comment-20900</guid>
		<description>All the three letter .com .net domains were renewed，so they can&#039;t be delete.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All the three letter .com .net domains were renewed，so they can&#8217;t be delete.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Fox</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2009/10/17/3-three-letter-coms-to-drop-sunday/comment-page-1/#comment-20899</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Fox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2009 07:14:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=5770#comment-20899</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve already wrapped up all 3.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve already wrapped up all 3.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

