<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Broadway Blog: No One Will Buy BroadwayShows.com At The TRAFFIC Auction</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thedomains.com/2009/10/16/broadway-blog-no-one-will-buy-broadwayshows-com-at-the-traffic-auction/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2009/10/16/broadway-blog-no-one-will-buy-broadwayshows-com-at-the-traffic-auction/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 20:38:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Snoopy</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2009/10/16/broadway-blog-no-one-will-buy-broadwayshows-com-at-the-traffic-auction/comment-page-1/#comment-20855</link>
		<dc:creator>Snoopy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 10:56:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=5758#comment-20855</guid>
		<description>&quot;I’d take $100K for BroadwayShows.com.&quot;

I don&#039;t doubt it (things like that have happened alot in the past) but I think it would be a huge mistake, it would be 10-12 years revenue. Would go well beyond 100k that at any decent auction house. 800k is absurd but at 100k people would be all over it ike a rash.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I’d take $100K for BroadwayShows.com.&#8221;</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t doubt it (things like that have happened alot in the past) but I think it would be a huge mistake, it would be 10-12 years revenue. Would go well beyond 100k that at any decent auction house. 800k is absurd but at 100k people would be all over it ike a rash.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Snoopy</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2009/10/16/broadway-blog-no-one-will-buy-broadwayshows-com-at-the-traffic-auction/comment-page-1/#comment-20854</link>
		<dc:creator>Snoopy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 10:48:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=5758#comment-20854</guid>
		<description>&quot;No way is BroadwayShows.com worth more than Shows.com or Broadway.com. Shows.com sold for $105K this year which in retrospect was a STEAL. Looking at search stats and CPC, I’d say $100K would be a fair price for BroadwayShows.com. That, to me, means Shows.com is worth $1+M at the least.&quot;

If you are comparing broadwayshows.com and shows.com using &quot;search stats and CPC&quot; how do you conclude shows.com is worth ten times the price?

Traffic for the term &quot;shows&quot; looks to be worth 10%-20% the value of traffic on &quot;broadway shows&quot;. Secondly &quot;broadway shows&quot; is more popular as a term. 

Shows.com is a real mix bag, selling broadway tickets is a possiblity but the name isn&#039;t obviously targeted to it. Ranking well for a term like &quot;shows&quot; wouldn&#039;t be the obvious boon that ranking well on &quot;broadway shows&quot; would be.

Agree about broadway.com though, that name is the big domain for the area, ultra high value, popular and has a huge amount of crediblity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;No way is BroadwayShows.com worth more than Shows.com or Broadway.com. Shows.com sold for $105K this year which in retrospect was a STEAL. Looking at search stats and CPC, I’d say $100K would be a fair price for BroadwayShows.com. That, to me, means Shows.com is worth $1+M at the least.&#8221;</p>
<p>If you are comparing broadwayshows.com and shows.com using &#8220;search stats and CPC&#8221; how do you conclude shows.com is worth ten times the price?</p>
<p>Traffic for the term &#8220;shows&#8221; looks to be worth 10%-20% the value of traffic on &#8220;broadway shows&#8221;. Secondly &#8220;broadway shows&#8221; is more popular as a term. </p>
<p>Shows.com is a real mix bag, selling broadway tickets is a possiblity but the name isn&#8217;t obviously targeted to it. Ranking well for a term like &#8220;shows&#8221; wouldn&#8217;t be the obvious boon that ranking well on &#8220;broadway shows&#8221; would be.</p>
<p>Agree about broadway.com though, that name is the big domain for the area, ultra high value, popular and has a huge amount of crediblity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: M. Menius</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2009/10/16/broadway-blog-no-one-will-buy-broadwayshows-com-at-the-traffic-auction/comment-page-1/#comment-20853</link>
		<dc:creator>M. Menius</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 10:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=5758#comment-20853</guid>
		<description>Factor in too that many financially comfortable folks weren&#039;t affected by the recession. So they buy if they want to buy. 

I assume most readers here would agree that the U.S. economy will re-establish itself and that the next wave of economic activity will resume. Look at how sales have continued almost regardless of the &quot;recession&quot;. Once general business resets &amp; restarts, there will be a notable increase in internet/domain related projects &amp; expenditures.

The major drag on future growth will be lack of jobs and the ongoing welfare costs enacted and multiplied en masse ... payed for by American business. The crankstart for fixing this is legislation which passes domestic oil drilling &amp; Energy Alternatives. If the administration will do this (stop dawdling Obama!), watch the economy spring forward. Mark those words.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Factor in too that many financially comfortable folks weren&#8217;t affected by the recession. So they buy if they want to buy. </p>
<p>I assume most readers here would agree that the U.S. economy will re-establish itself and that the next wave of economic activity will resume. Look at how sales have continued almost regardless of the &#8220;recession&#8221;. Once general business resets &amp; restarts, there will be a notable increase in internet/domain related projects &amp; expenditures.</p>
<p>The major drag on future growth will be lack of jobs and the ongoing welfare costs enacted and multiplied en masse &#8230; payed for by American business. The crankstart for fixing this is legislation which passes domestic oil drilling &amp; Energy Alternatives. If the administration will do this (stop dawdling Obama!), watch the economy spring forward. Mark those words.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Everything.tv</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2009/10/16/broadway-blog-no-one-will-buy-broadwayshows-com-at-the-traffic-auction/comment-page-1/#comment-20851</link>
		<dc:creator>Everything.tv</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 21:54:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=5758#comment-20851</guid>
		<description>Agree Tony, Maybe someone should look at the financial crisis Broadway is in, Just about anyone would take $100,000.  The name is nowhere close to Brazil.com not in the same universe and in these economic times it got $500,000.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agree Tony, Maybe someone should look at the financial crisis Broadway is in, Just about anyone would take $100,000.  The name is nowhere close to Brazil.com not in the same universe and in these economic times it got $500,000.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2009/10/16/broadway-blog-no-one-will-buy-broadwayshows-com-at-the-traffic-auction/comment-page-1/#comment-20848</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 18:44:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=5758#comment-20848</guid>
		<description>Domain,

I&#039;d take $100K for BroadwayShows.com.

I&#039;m not Rick Schwartz and don&#039;t have his leverage.

I&#039;d take the $100K because I believe I can get a better domain.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Domain,</p>
<p>I&#8217;d take $100K for BroadwayShows.com.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not Rick Schwartz and don&#8217;t have his leverage.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d take the $100K because I believe I can get a better domain.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: M. Menius</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2009/10/16/broadway-blog-no-one-will-buy-broadwayshows-com-at-the-traffic-auction/comment-page-1/#comment-20846</link>
		<dc:creator>M. Menius</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 16:53:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=5758#comment-20846</guid>
		<description>Ditto MHB and Castello&#039;s comments above. The insinuation &quot;has no intrinsic value&quot; discredits &amp; nullifies everything the critic said. 

In fact, he likely wants the domain ... but cannot afford it. Yes, the price may be too high for the current market. But trying to convince others it has no intrinsic value is a truly moronic statement.

I might add that while Broadway.com would be ultimate ... it is developed, unavailable &amp; out of reach (unless you&#039;re extremely wealthy). Consequently, BroadwayShows.com is a very close second and arguably provides a desired specificity. So the owner is in the driver&#039;s seat ... and likely knows it. If he&#039;s not in a hurry to sell, then it makes no sense to underprice the domain. This lesson trumps all other considerations (assuming under no pressure to sell).

Put another way, if the price for Broadway.com is $8 million, then BroadwayShows.com at 800k looks really, really good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ditto MHB and Castello&#8217;s comments above. The insinuation &#8220;has no intrinsic value&#8221; discredits &amp; nullifies everything the critic said. </p>
<p>In fact, he likely wants the domain &#8230; but cannot afford it. Yes, the price may be too high for the current market. But trying to convince others it has no intrinsic value is a truly moronic statement.</p>
<p>I might add that while Broadway.com would be ultimate &#8230; it is developed, unavailable &amp; out of reach (unless you&#8217;re extremely wealthy). Consequently, BroadwayShows.com is a very close second and arguably provides a desired specificity. So the owner is in the driver&#8217;s seat &#8230; and likely knows it. If he&#8217;s not in a hurry to sell, then it makes no sense to underprice the domain. This lesson trumps all other considerations (assuming under no pressure to sell).</p>
<p>Put another way, if the price for Broadway.com is $8 million, then BroadwayShows.com at 800k looks really, really good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Domain Investor</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2009/10/16/broadway-blog-no-one-will-buy-broadwayshows-com-at-the-traffic-auction/comment-page-1/#comment-20844</link>
		<dc:creator>Domain Investor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 16:38:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=5758#comment-20844</guid>
		<description>Tony,
If you owned the domain, would you sell it for $ 100K ??
I doubt it.

If Rick Schwartz owned the domain, what do you think he would get for it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tony,<br />
If you owned the domain, would you sell it for $ 100K ??<br />
I doubt it.</p>
<p>If Rick Schwartz owned the domain, what do you think he would get for it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2009/10/16/broadway-blog-no-one-will-buy-broadwayshows-com-at-the-traffic-auction/comment-page-1/#comment-20843</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 16:11:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=5758#comment-20843</guid>
		<description>Please do  not compare broadway.com to broadwayshows.com, that´s a huge difference between them. The show biz is one of the most affected sectors by these times and so it is no wonder why it didn´t sell for the asked price, too high level imo. Maybe 100k does well but not more.
Regards</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please do  not compare broadway.com to broadwayshows.com, that´s a huge difference between them. The show biz is one of the most affected sectors by these times and so it is no wonder why it didn´t sell for the asked price, too high level imo. Maybe 100k does well but not more.<br />
Regards</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2009/10/16/broadway-blog-no-one-will-buy-broadwayshows-com-at-the-traffic-auction/comment-page-1/#comment-20842</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 16:10:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=5758#comment-20842</guid>
		<description>No way is BroadwayShows.com worth more than Shows.com or Broadway.com.  Shows.com sold for $105K this year which in retrospect was a STEAL.  Looking at search stats and CPC, I&#039;d say $100K would be a fair price for BroadwayShows.com.  That, to me, means Shows.com is worth $1+M at the least.  

I officially am flipflopping my vote from AreaRugs.com to Shows.com as the best mid-xxxK deal of the year so far.

:)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No way is BroadwayShows.com worth more than Shows.com or Broadway.com.  Shows.com sold for $105K this year which in retrospect was a STEAL.  Looking at search stats and CPC, I&#8217;d say $100K would be a fair price for BroadwayShows.com.  That, to me, means Shows.com is worth $1+M at the least.  </p>
<p>I officially am flipflopping my vote from AreaRugs.com to Shows.com as the best mid-xxxK deal of the year so far.</p>
<p> <img src='http://www.thedomains.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BroadwayShows.com Overpriced &#8211; Food for Thought Or Something Else? &#124; Domain Name News &#124; Domain News &#124; Expired Domains</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2009/10/16/broadway-blog-no-one-will-buy-broadwayshows-com-at-the-traffic-auction/comment-page-1/#comment-20841</link>
		<dc:creator>BroadwayShows.com Overpriced &#8211; Food for Thought Or Something Else? &#124; Domain Name News &#124; Domain News &#124; Expired Domains</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 15:42:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=5758#comment-20841</guid>
		<description>[...] at thedomains.com domainers have gone over the blogger&#8217;s comments and have given their thoughts on the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] at thedomains.com domainers have gone over the blogger&#8217;s comments and have given their thoughts on the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

