Comments on: Bloggers Need To Respect Domain Buyers Privacy Requests http://www.thedomains.com/2009/10/12/bloggers-need-to-respect-domain-buyers-privacy-requests/ Sun, 12 Feb 2012 20:38:46 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Afternic Removes Recently Sold Domains Page And 302 Redirects Old URL To Search Page - Product Domains http://www.thedomains.com/2009/10/12/bloggers-need-to-respect-domain-buyers-privacy-requests/comment-page-1/#comment-21018 Afternic Removes Recently Sold Domains Page And 302 Redirects Old URL To Search Page - Product Domains Wed, 21 Oct 2009 20:28:58 +0000 http://www.thedomains.com/?p=5692#comment-21018 [...] 302 redirected to http://www.afternic.com/search.php. Could this be because of all the comments on this post from The Domains about bloggers needing to respect domain buyers privacy requests or is it a [...] [...] 302 redirected to http://www.afternic.com/search.php. Could this be because of all the comments on this post from The Domains about bloggers needing to respect domain buyers privacy requests or is it a [...]

]]> By: Jon http://www.thedomains.com/2009/10/12/bloggers-need-to-respect-domain-buyers-privacy-requests/comment-page-1/#comment-20822 Jon Fri, 16 Oct 2009 03:42:58 +0000 http://www.thedomains.com/?p=5692#comment-20822 I think some of Pete Lamson's comments on ChefPatrick's blog last week may have unwittingly led to disclosure. (http://tr.im/BXnA) I know I was a bit perplexed by what seemed like a non-denial denial, and then the non sequitur about "additional (private) sales." I have no problem with Pete or NameMedia; just thought the whole commentary was a confusing at the very least. I think some of Pete Lamson’s comments on ChefPatrick’s blog last week may have unwittingly led to disclosure. (http://tr.im/BXnA) I know I was a bit perplexed by what seemed like a non-denial denial, and then the non sequitur about “additional (private) sales.” I have no problem with Pete or NameMedia; just thought the whole commentary was a confusing at the very least.

]]> By: Adam http://www.thedomains.com/2009/10/12/bloggers-need-to-respect-domain-buyers-privacy-requests/comment-page-1/#comment-20759 Adam Wed, 14 Oct 2009 04:21:20 +0000 http://www.thedomains.com/?p=5692#comment-20759 I've seen this mistake routinely made at the larger venues. It should be noted that if you are going to make deals that you want private to have the T's crossed and I's dotted in those contracts. I’ve seen this mistake routinely made at the larger venues. It should be noted that if you are going to make deals that you want private to have the T’s crossed and I’s dotted in those contracts.

]]> By: Andrew http://www.thedomains.com/2009/10/12/bloggers-need-to-respect-domain-buyers-privacy-requests/comment-page-1/#comment-20719 Andrew Tue, 13 Oct 2009 17:06:17 +0000 http://www.thedomains.com/?p=5692#comment-20719 I don't think this was ever a secret. The broker sent it out on their sales feed last week. I wouldn't blame anyone for writing about it. I wouldn't expect anyone who sees a publicly listed sale to then confirm with the broker whether or not they wanted it to be public. I don’t think this was ever a secret. The broker sent it out on their sales feed last week. I wouldn’t blame anyone for writing about it. I wouldn’t expect anyone who sees a publicly listed sale to then confirm with the broker whether or not they wanted it to be public.

]]> By: MHB http://www.thedomains.com/2009/10/12/bloggers-need-to-respect-domain-buyers-privacy-requests/comment-page-1/#comment-20718 MHB Tue, 13 Oct 2009 17:02:40 +0000 http://www.thedomains.com/?p=5692#comment-20718 Luck.com is the domain and the broker has now listed it since the news is out. Luck.com is the domain and the broker has now listed it since the news is out.

]]> By: Andrew http://www.thedomains.com/2009/10/12/bloggers-need-to-respect-domain-buyers-privacy-requests/comment-page-1/#comment-20717 Andrew Tue, 13 Oct 2009 16:58:06 +0000 http://www.thedomains.com/?p=5692#comment-20717 Look, are we talking about Luck.com or not? If it's Luck.com, the broker isn't keeping this secret at all -- it's on their web site. If it's not, then what are we talking about? Look, are we talking about Luck.com or not? If it’s Luck.com, the broker isn’t keeping this secret at all — it’s on their web site. If it’s not, then what are we talking about?

]]> By: Cartoonz http://www.thedomains.com/2009/10/12/bloggers-need-to-respect-domain-buyers-privacy-requests/comment-page-1/#comment-20714 Cartoonz Tue, 13 Oct 2009 16:46:47 +0000 http://www.thedomains.com/?p=5692#comment-20714 The Broker is yet again today spreading this "news" on FB... The Broker is yet again today spreading this “news” on FB…

]]> By: john http://www.thedomains.com/2009/10/12/bloggers-need-to-respect-domain-buyers-privacy-requests/comment-page-1/#comment-20705 john Tue, 13 Oct 2009 14:50:58 +0000 http://www.thedomains.com/?p=5692#comment-20705 Bloggers and/or reporters do not need to respect a damn thing in this regard. If someone wants the sale private then sign NDAs and put the necessary legal paperwork in place. Don't bitch and moan later about it because it was leaked when there was nothing protecting the details of the transaction in the first place. Bloggers and/or reporters do not need to respect a damn thing in this regard.

If someone wants the sale private then sign NDAs and put the necessary legal paperwork in place. Don’t bitch and moan later about it because it was leaked when there was nothing protecting the details of the transaction in the first place.

]]> By: Andrew http://www.thedomains.com/2009/10/12/bloggers-need-to-respect-domain-buyers-privacy-requests/comment-page-1/#comment-20698 Andrew Tue, 13 Oct 2009 02:08:44 +0000 http://www.thedomains.com/?p=5692#comment-20698 MHB - if we're talking about the same domain, the broker posted it to their publicly available sales feed, which gets syndicated through RSS. Once you get something out on RSS, it's a little late to call it back in. MHB – if we’re talking about the same domain, the broker posted it to their publicly available sales feed, which gets syndicated through RSS. Once you get something out on RSS, it’s a little late to call it back in.

]]> By: Jamie http://www.thedomains.com/2009/10/12/bloggers-need-to-respect-domain-buyers-privacy-requests/comment-page-1/#comment-20696 Jamie Tue, 13 Oct 2009 00:39:22 +0000 http://www.thedomains.com/?p=5692#comment-20696 To help further explain my first comment above, I had visited this link on Afternic https://www.afternic.com/names.php?c=0&sold=1 which they post sold domains on each week day. I happened to see a domain on the list and I reported it that day on my blog after confirming the domain changed ownership via Whois, but I was tipped off from seeing the domain listed on the sold page via the link above on Afternic. A little while after I wrote about it, somebody posted a comment that asked where I got the info, which made me go back to the link above and I noticed the domain I reported was gone from the list. Since the domain was removed from the list, makes me think the domain was listed by Afternic by mistake publicly and the buyer or seller wanted to keep that specific domain private. I was never contacted to remove my posting about the domain I wrote about, so I think this is a different domain then what I wrote about. To help further explain my first comment above, I had visited this link on Afternic https://www.afternic.com/names.php?c=0&sold=1 which they post sold domains on each week day. I happened to see a domain on the list and I reported it that day on my blog after confirming the domain changed ownership via Whois, but I was tipped off from seeing the domain listed on the sold page via the link above on Afternic. A little while after I wrote about it, somebody posted a comment that asked where I got the info, which made me go back to the link above and I noticed the domain I reported was gone from the list. Since the domain was removed from the list, makes me think the domain was listed by Afternic by mistake publicly and the buyer or seller wanted to keep that specific domain private. I was never contacted to remove my posting about the domain I wrote about, so I think this is a different domain then what I wrote about.

]]>