<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Really Good News Numbers Behind The Mint.com Sale: Valuations Are Back Up</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thedomains.com/2009/09/14/the-really-good-news-numbers-behind-the-mint-com-sale-valuations-are-back-up/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2009/09/14/the-really-good-news-numbers-behind-the-mint-com-sale-valuations-are-back-up/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 20:38:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: pttugas ultimate</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2009/09/14/the-really-good-news-numbers-behind-the-mint-com-sale-valuations-are-back-up/comment-page-1/#comment-34236</link>
		<dc:creator>pttugas ultimate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Apr 2010 22:23:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=5370#comment-34236</guid>
		<description>Thats a good post!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thats a good post!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: What We Can Learn About Intuit’s Purchase of Mint.com for $170 Million &#124; DNyap.com - the best of the domaining blogs</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2009/09/14/the-really-good-news-numbers-behind-the-mint-com-sale-valuations-are-back-up/comment-page-1/#comment-20203</link>
		<dc:creator>What We Can Learn About Intuit’s Purchase of Mint.com for $170 Million &#124; DNyap.com - the best of the domaining blogs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2009 10:44:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=5370#comment-20203</guid>
		<description>[...] QuickBooks, MyCorporation.com, etc) at the WSJ Online as well as the synopsis by Chef Patrick and Michael Berkens and I was struck by something that I think is very applicable to all domainers, developers, and web [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] QuickBooks, MyCorporation.com, etc) at the WSJ Online as well as the synopsis by Chef Patrick and Michael Berkens and I was struck by something that I think is very applicable to all domainers, developers, and web [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Free Domain Newsletter</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2009/09/14/the-really-good-news-numbers-behind-the-mint-com-sale-valuations-are-back-up/comment-page-1/#comment-19580</link>
		<dc:creator>Free Domain Newsletter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 22:28:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=5370#comment-19580</guid>
		<description>&quot;One that comes to mind is RATE.com owned by the Castello’s. Bankrate would do well to invest in that one, imo.&quot;

While Rate.com certainly has some serious value, when it comes to making some serious money with financial development (Like BankAHolic.com) the value comes in great content and services. Bankaholic.com could have just as easily been BankMatter.com, BankMan.com, or JankyBanky.com, the value was in what was done with the property.

It seems that this is a major point that many domainers miss, yes, domains do have some serious value, but a good domain will not &quot;make&quot; a business. To say that the Castillos should make rate.com a priority might be good advice, but the truth of the matter is that making rate.com a priority would be a HUGE business development and in the end, having Rate.com as the website would probably not make that much of a difference. The value would be in what they put at it.

Many domainers don&#039;t seem to understand that a domain is not the only thing required for a killer business. (I am not saying this is you).

Many business people don&#039;t understand just how much a killer domain can help.=)

The real money will be found by the people the understand the importance of a legitimate business, as well as the value of a quality domain. 

Domainers should be endusers, it would revolutionize the industry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;One that comes to mind is RATE.com owned by the Castello’s. Bankrate would do well to invest in that one, imo.&#8221;</p>
<p>While Rate.com certainly has some serious value, when it comes to making some serious money with financial development (Like BankAHolic.com) the value comes in great content and services. Bankaholic.com could have just as easily been BankMatter.com, BankMan.com, or JankyBanky.com, the value was in what was done with the property.</p>
<p>It seems that this is a major point that many domainers miss, yes, domains do have some serious value, but a good domain will not &#8220;make&#8221; a business. To say that the Castillos should make rate.com a priority might be good advice, but the truth of the matter is that making rate.com a priority would be a HUGE business development and in the end, having Rate.com as the website would probably not make that much of a difference. The value would be in what they put at it.</p>
<p>Many domainers don&#8217;t seem to understand that a domain is not the only thing required for a killer business. (I am not saying this is you).</p>
<p>Many business people don&#8217;t understand just how much a killer domain can help.=)</p>
<p>The real money will be found by the people the understand the importance of a legitimate business, as well as the value of a quality domain. </p>
<p>Domainers should be endusers, it would revolutionize the industry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: M. Menius</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2009/09/14/the-really-good-news-numbers-behind-the-mint-com-sale-valuations-are-back-up/comment-page-1/#comment-19579</link>
		<dc:creator>M. Menius</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 22:19:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=5370#comment-19579</guid>
		<description>@Harpeet = &quot;bankaholic blog sold for $15 million awhile back to bankrate.com&quot;

I was not aware of this. $15 million could buy some high level accretive domains. One that comes to mind is RATE.com owned by the Castello&#039;s. Bankrate would do well to invest in that one, imo.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Harpeet = &#8220;bankaholic blog sold for $15 million awhile back to bankrate.com&#8221;</p>
<p>I was not aware of this. $15 million could buy some high level accretive domains. One that comes to mind is RATE.com owned by the Castello&#8217;s. Bankrate would do well to invest in that one, imo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mint.com’s Former Owner Makes Millions In Sale Of Mint To Intuit</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2009/09/14/the-really-good-news-numbers-behind-the-mint-com-sale-valuations-are-back-up/comment-page-1/#comment-19565</link>
		<dc:creator>Mint.com’s Former Owner Makes Millions In Sale Of Mint To Intuit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 14:06:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=5370#comment-19565</guid>
		<description>[...] Last week we told you about the sale of Mint.com, the financial site to Intuit for $170 million. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Last week we told you about the sale of Mint.com, the financial site to Intuit for $170 million. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harpeet Sanjay</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2009/09/14/the-really-good-news-numbers-behind-the-mint-com-sale-valuations-are-back-up/comment-page-1/#comment-19467</link>
		<dc:creator>Harpeet Sanjay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 23:58:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=5370#comment-19467</guid>
		<description>bankaholic blog sold for $15 million awhile back to bankrate.com

there are rumors on a forum that the price was 30 times his annual revenue from affiliate commisions</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>bankaholic blog sold for $15 million awhile back to bankrate.com</p>
<p>there are rumors on a forum that the price was 30 times his annual revenue from affiliate commisions</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Schneider</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2009/09/14/the-really-good-news-numbers-behind-the-mint-com-sale-valuations-are-back-up/comment-page-1/#comment-19449</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Schneider</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 17:57:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=5370#comment-19449</guid>
		<description>Hello Mike,

Here we go again. Its the age old argument of the non owners of premium domain addresses dissing the completely detached importance of a key root domain name  address in the success of a businesses that gets the importance of using them. Yes I know that it eats you alive that you missed out on the best names that are the foundation to success on the  alphabet controlled reference world on the web. 

The fact is that to be accessed on the web you need a call letter identified address. Without a good identifying address a company is unrecognizable, if it cannot be easily remembered and have some source of identification. You have to locate a company through its address. You can argue all you want how unimportant a web address is , but without its foundation you will not be located. KISS , location,location,location or Locate,Locate,Locate.

Gratefully ,  Jeff</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Mike,</p>
<p>Here we go again. Its the age old argument of the non owners of premium domain addresses dissing the completely detached importance of a key root domain name  address in the success of a businesses that gets the importance of using them. Yes I know that it eats you alive that you missed out on the best names that are the foundation to success on the  alphabet controlled reference world on the web. </p>
<p>The fact is that to be accessed on the web you need a call letter identified address. Without a good identifying address a company is unrecognizable, if it cannot be easily remembered and have some source of identification. You have to locate a company through its address. You can argue all you want how unimportant a web address is , but without its foundation you will not be located. KISS , location,location,location or Locate,Locate,Locate.</p>
<p>Gratefully ,  Jeff</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MHB</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2009/09/14/the-really-good-news-numbers-behind-the-mint-com-sale-valuations-are-back-up/comment-page-1/#comment-19444</link>
		<dc:creator>MHB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 16:42:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=5370#comment-19444</guid>
		<description>Ameen

We understand this but the price being paid 17X revenue is nice to see and would the company have gotten in 2 years to this point without a great domain?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ameen</p>
<p>We understand this but the price being paid 17X revenue is nice to see and would the company have gotten in 2 years to this point without a great domain?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ameen Aliyar</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2009/09/14/the-really-good-news-numbers-behind-the-mint-com-sale-valuations-are-back-up/comment-page-1/#comment-19442</link>
		<dc:creator>Ameen Aliyar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 16:36:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=5370#comment-19442</guid>
		<description>The price is not for the domain name alone. 
It is for the business. So the whole business built around mint.com is evaluated at $170 million.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The price is not for the domain name alone.<br />
It is for the business. So the whole business built around mint.com is evaluated at $170 million.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: D</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2009/09/14/the-really-good-news-numbers-behind-the-mint-com-sale-valuations-are-back-up/comment-page-1/#comment-19414</link>
		<dc:creator>D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 03:09:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=5370#comment-19414</guid>
		<description>My average generic portfolio acquiring price is now at 15 years revenue (used to be 11 but PPC falling) and only because many of them I park in TM way, otherwise I would be looking at 30-40 years. Never heard of anyone selling bellow 10 years, I am talking here pure type-in traffic parked not some scrap lucky enough to be indexed at the moment or some expired, both of which will lose the traffic eventually...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My average generic portfolio acquiring price is now at 15 years revenue (used to be 11 but PPC falling) and only because many of them I park in TM way, otherwise I would be looking at 30-40 years. Never heard of anyone selling bellow 10 years, I am talking here pure type-in traffic parked not some scrap lucky enough to be indexed at the moment or some expired, both of which will lose the traffic eventually&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

