<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Front Running On Proposed g&#8217;TLD&#8217;s: Companies Are Getting Trademarks On g&#8217;TLD&#8217;s</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thedomains.com/2009/07/30/front-running-on-proposed-gtlds-companies-are-getting-trademarks-on-gtlds/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2009/07/30/front-running-on-proposed-gtlds-companies-are-getting-trademarks-on-gtlds/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 20:38:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: cartoonz</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2009/07/30/front-running-on-proposed-gtlds-companies-are-getting-trademarks-on-gtlds/comment-page-1/#comment-17292</link>
		<dc:creator>cartoonz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2009 21:15:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=4601#comment-17292</guid>
		<description>I think JB did a writeup once on all the ICANN insiders&#039; attempts to TM the single letter .com names in anticipation of their eventual release.

Disgraceful, at best.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think JB did a writeup once on all the ICANN insiders&#8217; attempts to TM the single letter .com names in anticipation of their eventual release.</p>
<p>Disgraceful, at best.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 国取り合戦が世界規模で始まった・・・ &#124; DomainsNews.net</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2009/07/30/front-running-on-proposed-gtlds-companies-are-getting-trademarks-on-gtlds/comment-page-1/#comment-17251</link>
		<dc:creator>国取り合戦が世界規模で始まった・・・ &#124; DomainsNews.net</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 07:57:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=4601#comment-17251</guid>
		<description>[...] Front Running On Proposed g’TLD’s: Companies Are Getting Trademarks On g’TLD’s &#124; The Domains [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Front Running On Proposed g’TLD’s: Companies Are Getting Trademarks On g’TLD’s | The Domains [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jp</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2009/07/30/front-running-on-proposed-gtlds-companies-are-getting-trademarks-on-gtlds/comment-page-1/#comment-17242</link>
		<dc:creator>jp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 23:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=4601#comment-17242</guid>
		<description>I was under the impression that you cannot be granted a TM without supplying a specimen to the USPTO. They must have all just applied with an &quot;Intent To Use&quot;. I&#039;m not sure that these Intent To Use applications mean anything. If someone else actually gets the .tld instead of the Intent To Use applicant I don&#039;t believe you can use the Intent To Use as legal recourse to get the .tld. Furthermore if someone else gets the .tld, its going to be hard for the Intent To Use applicant to supply a specimen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was under the impression that you cannot be granted a TM without supplying a specimen to the USPTO. They must have all just applied with an &#8220;Intent To Use&#8221;. I&#8217;m not sure that these Intent To Use applications mean anything. If someone else actually gets the .tld instead of the Intent To Use applicant I don&#8217;t believe you can use the Intent To Use as legal recourse to get the .tld. Furthermore if someone else gets the .tld, its going to be hard for the Intent To Use applicant to supply a specimen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MHB</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2009/07/30/front-running-on-proposed-gtlds-companies-are-getting-trademarks-on-gtlds/comment-page-1/#comment-17237</link>
		<dc:creator>MHB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 21:24:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=4601#comment-17237</guid>
		<description>Andrew

Thanks for the link to Mr. Couvering&#039;s response.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andrew</p>
<p>Thanks for the link to Mr. Couvering&#8217;s response.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2009/07/30/front-running-on-proposed-gtlds-companies-are-getting-trademarks-on-gtlds/comment-page-1/#comment-17234</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 20:54:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=4601#comment-17234</guid>
		<description>Michael, the company he&#039;s referring to is parent company of Mind + Machines.  You can see their CEO Antony Van Couvering&#039;s response here:

http://domainnamewire.com/2009/06/29/companies-file-trademarks-for-new-top-level-domain-names/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael, the company he&#8217;s referring to is parent company of Mind + Machines.  You can see their CEO Antony Van Couvering&#8217;s response here:</p>
<p><a href="http://domainnamewire.com/2009/06/29/companies-file-trademarks-for-new-top-level-domain-names/" rel="nofollow">http://domainnamewire.com/2009/06/29/companies-file-trademarks-for-new-top-level-domain-names/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

