Comments on: New Study: Bing.com Ads More Likely To Clicked Than Google Ads http://www.thedomains.com/2009/07/28/new-study-bingcom-users-more-likely-to-click-on-ads-than-google-users/ Sun, 12 Feb 2012 20:38:46 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: seo http://www.thedomains.com/2009/07/28/new-study-bingcom-users-more-likely-to-click-on-ads-than-google-users/comment-page-1/#comment-18077 seo Wed, 19 Aug 2009 11:26:44 +0000 http://www.thedomains.com/?p=4564#comment-18077 yeah i have also read it.i think the reason may depend on various things. yeah i have also read it.i think the reason may depend on various things.

]]> By: runescape gold http://www.thedomains.com/2009/07/28/new-study-bingcom-users-more-likely-to-click-on-ads-than-google-users/comment-page-1/#comment-17254 runescape gold Fri, 31 Jul 2009 09:48:53 +0000 http://www.thedomains.com/?p=4564#comment-17254 Its sad that Yahoo gave up on search a long time ago when it partnered originally with google. They just started focusing on becoming a media company instead of a search company. <a href="http://www.rs4items.com" rel="nofollow">runescape money</a> Its sad that Yahoo gave up on search a long time ago when it partnered originally with google. They just started focusing on becoming a media company instead of a search company.
runescape money

]]> By: Brian Carr http://www.thedomains.com/2009/07/28/new-study-bingcom-users-more-likely-to-click-on-ads-than-google-users/comment-page-1/#comment-17170 Brian Carr Wed, 29 Jul 2009 13:50:35 +0000 http://www.thedomains.com/?p=4564#comment-17170 This may also speak to the efficacy of Google Algo results vs. competitors. This may also speak to the efficacy of Google Algo results vs. competitors.

]]> By: FX http://www.thedomains.com/2009/07/28/new-study-bingcom-users-more-likely-to-click-on-ads-than-google-users/comment-page-1/#comment-17165 FX Wed, 29 Jul 2009 07:50:58 +0000 http://www.thedomains.com/?p=4564#comment-17165 here is proof from our sites traffic sources and adsense ctr google - 4.9% CTR bing - 5.8 CTR yahoo - 5.7 CTR aol - 11.2 % ask - 10.5% here is proof from our sites
traffic sources and adsense ctr

google – 4.9% CTR
bing – 5.8 CTR
yahoo – 5.7 CTR
aol – 11.2 %
ask – 10.5%

]]> By: Don http://www.thedomains.com/2009/07/28/new-study-bingcom-users-more-likely-to-click-on-ads-than-google-users/comment-page-1/#comment-17133 Don Tue, 28 Jul 2009 19:35:01 +0000 http://www.thedomains.com/?p=4564#comment-17133 Not much of it matters, what they should be counting is cost per transaction, or cost per sale. That is the end result period. Click thru rates , percentages and impressions mean nothing. I will take a site that gets me 10 clicks a month and 5 sales over a campaign that gets 5000 hits 2% ctr which would be 100 hits and 3 sales. If your paying $70 per transaction opposed to 5 bucks a click then you have you answer. Its all about quality not quantity. Don Not much of it matters, what they should be counting is cost per transaction, or cost per sale. That is the end result period. Click thru rates , percentages and impressions mean nothing. I will take a site that gets me 10 clicks a month and 5 sales over a campaign that gets 5000 hits 2% ctr which would be 100 hits and 3 sales.

If your paying $70 per transaction opposed to 5 bucks a click then you have you answer.

Its all about quality not quantity.

Don

]]> By: jp http://www.thedomains.com/2009/07/28/new-study-bingcom-users-more-likely-to-click-on-ads-than-google-users/comment-page-1/#comment-17129 jp Tue, 28 Jul 2009 18:18:23 +0000 http://www.thedomains.com/?p=4564#comment-17129 Most importanly, how about the Conversion Rate on these clicks? Which converts better for the advertiser? G or B? Of course you can't even have conversions without clicks. Most importanly, how about the Conversion Rate on these clicks? Which converts better for the advertiser? G or B? Of course you can’t even have conversions without clicks.

]]> By: Domain Investor http://www.thedomains.com/2009/07/28/new-study-bingcom-users-more-likely-to-click-on-ads-than-google-users/comment-page-1/#comment-17128 Domain Investor Tue, 28 Jul 2009 17:21:21 +0000 http://www.thedomains.com/?p=4564#comment-17128 It just dawned on me, what type of sites are they counting? 1. Made for google sites. 2. Fully developed sites like WSJ, Forbes. 3. PPC sites. 4. Sites like LuxuryBedding.com, cooking.com, We already know that Google and Bing go out of their way to not list any ppc sites in searches. It just dawned on me, what type of sites are they counting?

1. Made for google sites.
2. Fully developed sites like WSJ, Forbes.
3. PPC sites.
4. Sites like LuxuryBedding.com, cooking.com,

We already know that Google and Bing go out of their way to not list any ppc sites in searches.

]]> By: Domain Investor http://www.thedomains.com/2009/07/28/new-study-bingcom-users-more-likely-to-click-on-ads-than-google-users/comment-page-1/#comment-17127 Domain Investor Tue, 28 Jul 2009 17:11:47 +0000 http://www.thedomains.com/?p=4564#comment-17127 It is impressive Bing has a better click thru. However, G still delivers 8 times more clicks than B. And, we make our pennies from clicks. :( impressions __clicks __CTR G _26,929,367 __260,518 __0.97% Y __3,157,648 ___39,008 __1.24% B __2,236,366 ___33,558 __1.50% total _32,323,381 _333,084 __1.03% It is impressive Bing has a better click thru.
However, G still delivers 8 times more clicks than B.
And, we make our pennies from clicks.
:(

impressions __clicks __CTR
G _26,929,367 __260,518 __0.97%
Y __3,157,648 ___39,008 __1.24%
B __2,236,366 ___33,558 __1.50%

total _32,323,381 _333,084 __1.03%

]]> By: MHB http://www.thedomains.com/2009/07/28/new-study-bingcom-users-more-likely-to-click-on-ads-than-google-users/comment-page-1/#comment-17125 MHB Tue, 28 Jul 2009 16:54:05 +0000 http://www.thedomains.com/?p=4564#comment-17125 Troy Thanks very much. Troy

Thanks very much.

]]> By: Troy http://www.thedomains.com/2009/07/28/new-study-bingcom-users-more-likely-to-click-on-ads-than-google-users/comment-page-1/#comment-17124 Troy Tue, 28 Jul 2009 16:46:45 +0000 http://www.thedomains.com/?p=4564#comment-17124 By the way, saw your write up today on DNJournal. It was real nice. Congrats on everything. By the way, saw your write up today on DNJournal. It was real nice. Congrats on everything.

]]>