Comments on: Is Third Time The Charm? Toxic Sells For $27,600 On NameJet.com http://www.thedomains.com/2009/07/24/is-third-time-the-charm-toxic-sells-for-on-namejetcom/ Sun, 12 Feb 2012 20:38:46 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: MHB http://www.thedomains.com/2009/07/24/is-third-time-the-charm-toxic-sells-for-on-namejetcom/comment-page-1/#comment-16989 MHB Sat, 25 Jul 2009 14:24:05 +0000 http://www.thedomains.com/?p=4518#comment-16989 Ed At Namejet.com the domains are either controlled by the registrar in case of a drop and if an owned domain, NJ makes you transfer it to Enom in an account under their control. Snapnames.com, if its a privately owned domain, I believe makes you have the domain in an account with moniker.com so that the domain can be transferred from your account automatically upon sale and payment Ed

At Namejet.com the domains are either controlled by the registrar in case of a drop and if an owned domain, NJ makes you transfer it to Enom in an account under their control.

Snapnames.com, if its a privately owned domain, I believe makes you have the domain in an account with moniker.com so that the domain can be transferred from your account automatically upon sale and payment

]]> By: Ed - Michigan http://www.thedomains.com/2009/07/24/is-third-time-the-charm-toxic-sells-for-on-namejetcom/comment-page-1/#comment-16988 Ed - Michigan Sat, 25 Jul 2009 14:11:49 +0000 http://www.thedomains.com/?p=4518#comment-16988 Mike, Do the T.O.S. at these auction houses mandate the SELLER do their part and transfer the domain name ??? How can the buyers make sure that little part of the equation occurs ?? Ed - Michigan Mike,

Do the T.O.S. at these auction houses
mandate the SELLER do their part and
transfer the domain name ???

How can the buyers make sure that little
part of the equation occurs ??

Ed – Michigan

]]> By: D http://www.thedomains.com/2009/07/24/is-third-time-the-charm-toxic-sells-for-on-namejetcom/comment-page-1/#comment-16981 D Sat, 25 Jul 2009 03:35:14 +0000 http://www.thedomains.com/?p=4518#comment-16981 I have bid both times around 35K now this third time I did not bother, glad it sold for less at least these namejet cnuts got a lesson I have bid both times around 35K now this third time I did not bother, glad it sold for less at least these namejet cnuts got a lesson

]]> By: MHB http://www.thedomains.com/2009/07/24/is-third-time-the-charm-toxic-sells-for-on-namejetcom/comment-page-1/#comment-16975 MHB Sat, 25 Jul 2009 00:56:38 +0000 http://www.thedomains.com/?p=4518#comment-16975 Jamie So based on the .net being worth 5% of the .com value based on sales of sex and porn, .com and .net in the same year and the price of the original auction you could draw the conclusion that Tony got the Toxic.com for 1/2 price. Good for him. As to NJ it took a long time and lots of deadbeat bidders to devalue the auction and it will take time to rebuild the brand and the values Jamie

So based on the .net being worth 5% of the .com value based on sales of sex and porn, .com and .net in the same year and the price of the original auction you could draw the conclusion that Tony got the Toxic.com for 1/2 price.

Good for him.

As to NJ it took a long time and lots of deadbeat bidders to devalue the auction and it will take time to rebuild the brand and the values

]]> By: Jamie Zoch http://www.thedomains.com/2009/07/24/is-third-time-the-charm-toxic-sells-for-on-namejetcom/comment-page-1/#comment-16960 Jamie Zoch Fri, 24 Jul 2009 21:15:45 +0000 http://www.thedomains.com/?p=4518#comment-16960 I just did a little research... and taking a quote from one of your last posts: "The domain Toxic.net, which also was available for backorder on the same day, sold to a different bidder, “nimbus” for $2,900" Well, bidder "nimbus" was the high bidder on Toxic.com Today. According to whois records for Toxic.net, Timothy Reid is the new owner of Toxic.net after that auction ended . So it appears Tim paid for the .net, and it would be likely Toxic.com will be paid for this time as well. I just did a little research… and taking a quote from one of your last posts:

“The domain Toxic.net, which also was available for backorder on the same day, sold to a different bidder, “nimbus” for $2,900″

Well, bidder “nimbus” was the high bidder on Toxic.com Today.

According to whois records for Toxic.net, Timothy Reid is the new owner of Toxic.net after that auction ended .

So it appears Tim paid for the .net, and it would be likely Toxic.com will be paid for this time as well.

]]> By: Jamie Zoch http://www.thedomains.com/2009/07/24/is-third-time-the-charm-toxic-sells-for-on-namejetcom/comment-page-1/#comment-16959 Jamie Zoch Fri, 24 Jul 2009 21:08:59 +0000 http://www.thedomains.com/?p=4518#comment-16959 I am sure all these NPB's have effected this auction in a negative way, that has hurt it's value. I see YSE.com and Alike.com had non paying bidders as well and were resent to auction yesterday. Bidders dropping like flies over at NJ. :) I am sure all these NPB’s have effected this auction in a negative way, that has hurt it’s value.

I see YSE.com and Alike.com had non paying bidders as well and were resent to auction yesterday.

Bidders dropping like flies over at NJ. :)

]]>