<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Your May Not To Get To Use Your .CM Domains Until 2010</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thedomains.com/2009/07/18/your-may-not-to-get-to-use-your-cm-domains-until-2010/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2009/07/18/your-may-not-to-get-to-use-your-cm-domains-until-2010/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 20:38:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bryan</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2009/07/18/your-may-not-to-get-to-use-your-cm-domains-until-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-17422</link>
		<dc:creator>Bryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 14:57:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=4313#comment-17422</guid>
		<description>I won&#039;t be bidding on the handful of names I preordered through NameJet.  Although I am not a fan of the dotCM extension, I did hope to get a couple of names I could use for my business...  now after reading all this,  and not being able to get any answers why the auctions haven&#039;t started yet (they were scheduled to start 8-4) I will bow out and let others have the names.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I won&#8217;t be bidding on the handful of names I preordered through NameJet.  Although I am not a fan of the dotCM extension, I did hope to get a couple of names I could use for my business&#8230;  now after reading all this,  and not being able to get any answers why the auctions haven&#8217;t started yet (they were scheduled to start 8-4) I will bow out and let others have the names.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: snicksnack</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2009/07/18/your-may-not-to-get-to-use-your-cm-domains-until-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-16760</link>
		<dc:creator>snicksnack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 08:52:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=4313#comment-16760</guid>
		<description>Your headline is misleading. Just because a fully automated service to change the DNS isn&#039;t in place does not mean you cannot change it. Take a look at .COM.VN for example and how much they charge for DNS update, and it is also not instant. Also .NL charges for DNS updates and many more...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your headline is misleading. Just because a fully automated service to change the DNS isn&#8217;t in place does not mean you cannot change it. Take a look at .COM.VN for example and how much they charge for DNS update, and it is also not instant. Also .NL charges for DNS updates and many more&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MHB</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2009/07/18/your-may-not-to-get-to-use-your-cm-domains-until-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-16740</link>
		<dc:creator>MHB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 14:14:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=4313#comment-16740</guid>
		<description>Rob

Can&#039;t argue with you there.

Country codes are governed by local law.

Just wrote a piece on what ICANN can and can&#039;t do regarding country codes that you guys should all check out:

http://www.thedomains.com/2009/07/19/icann-has-little-power-on-cctlds/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rob</p>
<p>Can&#8217;t argue with you there.</p>
<p>Country codes are governed by local law.</p>
<p>Just wrote a piece on what ICANN can and can&#8217;t do regarding country codes that you guys should all check out:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.thedomains.com/2009/07/19/icann-has-little-power-on-cctlds/" rel="nofollow">http://www.thedomains.com/2009/07/19/icann-has-little-power-on-cctlds/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Sequin</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2009/07/18/your-may-not-to-get-to-use-your-cm-domains-until-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-16724</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Sequin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2009 22:45:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=4313#comment-16724</guid>
		<description>Ah. Cameroon. What a great place to do business. 

After they sell off all the TM infringing and scummy typo traffic domains for big bucks, they will nationalize all the domains and take them from the registrants.

You can file for a refund with the government of Cameroon. Of course you will have to appear in person and file some papers... 

Think it can&#039;t happen? 

Good luck with your investment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah. Cameroon. What a great place to do business. </p>
<p>After they sell off all the TM infringing and scummy typo traffic domains for big bucks, they will nationalize all the domains and take them from the registrants.</p>
<p>You can file for a refund with the government of Cameroon. Of course you will have to appear in person and file some papers&#8230; </p>
<p>Think it can&#8217;t happen? </p>
<p>Good luck with your investment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Domain Investor</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2009/07/18/your-may-not-to-get-to-use-your-cm-domains-until-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-16717</link>
		<dc:creator>Domain Investor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2009 18:42:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=4313#comment-16717</guid>
		<description>This is not brain surgery.  Managing a registry dns operation should not be that difficult.

And, since the domains are going for more than a few dollars, I don&#039;t think the registry is losing money.

If I&#039;m buying a new car, I really don&#039;t want to accept a few flaws like turning on the wiper blades so the head lights turn on.
The registry operations has a major flaw.

What is wrong when the registry is not cooperative?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is not brain surgery.  Managing a registry dns operation should not be that difficult.</p>
<p>And, since the domains are going for more than a few dollars, I don&#8217;t think the registry is losing money.</p>
<p>If I&#8217;m buying a new car, I really don&#8217;t want to accept a few flaws like turning on the wiper blades so the head lights turn on.<br />
The registry operations has a major flaw.</p>
<p>What is wrong when the registry is not cooperative?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jp</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2009/07/18/your-may-not-to-get-to-use-your-cm-domains-until-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-16714</link>
		<dc:creator>jp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2009 17:37:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=4313#comment-16714</guid>
		<description>.cm has always been like this. Its nice they are going to make a system where you can change the DNS yourself soon. This is one of the reasons why they never fully launched the tld. I had never gotten a .cm before but I had applied for a few in the past at times when It seemed like I could get one. On the application you had to list your nameservers. Back then I listed the DNS servers of XPertDNS.com, which allowed me to make most of the changes neccessray there. Funny thing is I never actually got awarded a .cm on any of my applications, and now that I could go for one and probably get it, I&#039;m not really interested after all that. Whenever I sent in the apps it would cost about double what they are charging now, and I would always be put into some sort of holding/waiting period. After like 6 months of waiting I would usually just get a refund for my fee and give up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>.cm has always been like this. Its nice they are going to make a system where you can change the DNS yourself soon. This is one of the reasons why they never fully launched the tld. I had never gotten a .cm before but I had applied for a few in the past at times when It seemed like I could get one. On the application you had to list your nameservers. Back then I listed the DNS servers of XPertDNS.com, which allowed me to make most of the changes neccessray there. Funny thing is I never actually got awarded a .cm on any of my applications, and now that I could go for one and probably get it, I&#8217;m not really interested after all that. Whenever I sent in the apps it would cost about double what they are charging now, and I would always be put into some sort of holding/waiting period. After like 6 months of waiting I would usually just get a refund for my fee and give up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: D</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2009/07/18/your-may-not-to-get-to-use-your-cm-domains-until-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-16712</link>
		<dc:creator>D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2009 16:24:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=4313#comment-16712</guid>
		<description>&quot;You should also realize that if the registry will not allow direct server changes then you can forget about transfers and sales until they get their act together as well&quot;

HUH ?
Enom push, new owner can keep using default Enom DNS
DUHHH !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;You should also realize that if the registry will not allow direct server changes then you can forget about transfers and sales until they get their act together as well&#8221;</p>
<p>HUH ?<br />
Enom push, new owner can keep using default Enom DNS<br />
DUHHH !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Domain Investor</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2009/07/18/your-may-not-to-get-to-use-your-cm-domains-until-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-16711</link>
		<dc:creator>Domain Investor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2009 16:18:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=4313#comment-16711</guid>
		<description>Quote -
&quot;you can forget about transfers and sales until they get their act together as well&quot;

That is a good point.  I didn&#039;t even consider that.

Is .cm registry accountable to Icann?
I would think the whois and dns obstacles would violate Icann rules.
??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quote -<br />
&#8220;you can forget about transfers and sales until they get their act together as well&#8221;</p>
<p>That is a good point.  I didn&#8217;t even consider that.</p>
<p>Is .cm registry accountable to Icann?<br />
I would think the whois and dns obstacles would violate Icann rules.<br />
??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MHB</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2009/07/18/your-may-not-to-get-to-use-your-cm-domains-until-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-16709</link>
		<dc:creator>MHB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2009 14:57:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=4313#comment-16709</guid>
		<description>Guys

You should also realize that if the registry will not allow direct server changes then you can forget about transfers and sales until they get their act together as well</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Guys</p>
<p>You should also realize that if the registry will not allow direct server changes then you can forget about transfers and sales until they get their act together as well</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: C.T</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2009/07/18/your-may-not-to-get-to-use-your-cm-domains-until-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-16708</link>
		<dc:creator>C.T</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2009 14:55:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=4313#comment-16708</guid>
		<description>Enom.com states the following from it&#039;s Dot CM Faqs:

&quot; Due to registry restrictions, .CM domains will have eNom name servers added to them at the time of registration. You will not be able to change the name servers until Early 2010 (as indicated by the registry). Meanwhile, you will be able to adjust your host records as you see fit, e.g. C NAME, A Record, URL Forwarding, TXT. &quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Enom.com states the following from it&#8217;s Dot CM Faqs:</p>
<p>&#8221; Due to registry restrictions, .CM domains will have eNom name servers added to them at the time of registration. You will not be able to change the name servers until Early 2010 (as indicated by the registry). Meanwhile, you will be able to adjust your host records as you see fit, e.g. C NAME, A Record, URL Forwarding, TXT. &#8220;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

