Comments on: “Its Deju Vu All Over Again” At NameJet.com http://www.thedomains.com/2009/07/18/its-deju-vu-all-over-again-at-namejetcom/ Mon, 15 Mar 2010 18:49:02 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1 hourly 1 By: domainfeeder.com http://www.thedomains.com/2009/07/18/its-deju-vu-all-over-again-at-namejetcom/comment-page-1/#comment-16773 domainfeeder.com Mon, 20 Jul 2009 16:24:50 +0000 http://www.thedomains.com/?p=4385#comment-16773 namejet should hold money in escrow to make sure these names are not pump and dump. namejet should hold money in escrow to make sure these names are not pump and dump.

]]> By: MHB http://www.thedomains.com/2009/07/18/its-deju-vu-all-over-again-at-namejetcom/comment-page-1/#comment-16739 MHB Sun, 19 Jul 2009 14:09:16 +0000 http://www.thedomains.com/?p=4385#comment-16739 Greg To be fair NameJet.com tightened up their deadbeat bidder rules last month and since then I haven't seen a domain go unpaid for yet, so maybe this policy is working. The 2 toxic auctions were before the changes were made To read about the changes to the NameJet.com bidder policy read this: http://www.thedomains.com/2009/06/25/namejetcom-toughens-its-dead-beat-bidder-policy-re-auction-policy-is-it-enough/ Greg

To be fair NameJet.com tightened up their deadbeat bidder rules last month and since then I haven’t seen a domain go unpaid for yet, so maybe this policy is working.

The 2 toxic auctions were before the changes were made

To read about the changes to the NameJet.com bidder policy read this:

http://www.thedomains.com/2009/06/25/namejetcom-toughens-its-dead-beat-bidder-policy-re-auction-policy-is-it-enough/

]]> By: stephen douglas http://www.thedomains.com/2009/07/18/its-deju-vu-all-over-again-at-namejetcom/comment-page-1/#comment-16738 stephen douglas Sun, 19 Jul 2009 13:27:39 +0000 http://www.thedomains.com/?p=4385#comment-16738 hi mikey, Toxic.com for $9999 is a great start. However, the real "phrase" that the word "toxic' applies to for the consumer is "toys. So, I'd be looking to buy the domain name "toxictoys.com" for parents wanting to avoid buying dangerous toys for their little angels. I think ToxicToys.com can be had for about $4999. Check out the website: http://www.thedailygreen.com. This site has a segment of their homepage dedicated to specifically TOXIC TOYS! Which is the better "focused" investment? I'm not sure, but I'd like some input to that question! cheers bro hi mikey,

Toxic.com for $9999 is a great start. However, the real “phrase” that the word “toxic’ applies to for the consumer is “toys. So, I’d be looking to buy the domain name “toxictoys.com” for parents wanting to avoid buying dangerous toys for their little angels.

I think ToxicToys.com can be had for about $4999. Check out the website: http://www.thedailygreen.com. This site has a segment of their homepage dedicated to specifically TOXIC TOYS!

Which is the better “focused” investment?

I’m not sure, but I’d like some input to that question!

cheers bro

]]> By: Greg http://www.thedomains.com/2009/07/18/its-deju-vu-all-over-again-at-namejetcom/comment-page-1/#comment-16730 Greg Sun, 19 Jul 2009 06:17:29 +0000 http://www.thedomains.com/?p=4385#comment-16730 You never know when bidding on on namejet if you are getting bid up by someone who wouldn't pay if they won. Its kind of frustrating in a sense You never know when bidding on on namejet if you are getting bid up by someone who wouldn’t pay if they won. Its kind of frustrating in a sense

]]> By: Reece Berg http://www.thedomains.com/2009/07/18/its-deju-vu-all-over-again-at-namejetcom/comment-page-1/#comment-16722 Reece Berg Sat, 18 Jul 2009 22:11:03 +0000 http://www.thedomains.com/?p=4385#comment-16722 Maybe NameJet should sell it on Sedo lol Maybe NameJet should sell it on Sedo lol

]]> By: Ron W. http://www.thedomains.com/2009/07/18/its-deju-vu-all-over-again-at-namejetcom/comment-page-1/#comment-16713 Ron W. Sat, 18 Jul 2009 17:36:20 +0000 http://www.thedomains.com/?p=4385#comment-16713 ...or maybe that name is "toxic"! :-) Just kidding...but on a serious note, hopefully it goes to a person who pays this time. …or maybe that name is “toxic”! :-) Just kidding…but on a serious note, hopefully it goes to a person who pays this time.

]]>