<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: TechCrunch: &#8220;Pre-Order Your .CM Domain Now, Start Making Money Off Domain Typos Soon&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thedomains.com/2009/07/08/techcrunch-cm-start-making-money-off-domain-typos-soon/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2009/07/08/techcrunch-cm-start-making-money-off-domain-typos-soon/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 18:49:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: BuGs</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2009/07/08/techcrunch-cm-start-making-money-off-domain-typos-soon/comment-page-1/#comment-24781</link>
		<dc:creator>BuGs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 18:46:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=4175#comment-24781</guid>
		<description>Take a look at this. :) There has already been tons of .cm orders, PLUS &quot;.cmo&quot; order. from www.yoursitecan.be they&#039;re capitalizing on the pre-registering.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Take a look at this. <img src='http://www.thedomains.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  There has already been tons of .cm orders, PLUS &#8220;.cmo&#8221; order. from <a href="http://www.yoursitecan.be" rel="nofollow">http://www.yoursitecan.be</a> they&#8217;re capitalizing on the pre-registering.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MHB</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2009/07/08/techcrunch-cm-start-making-money-off-domain-typos-soon/comment-page-1/#comment-17218</link>
		<dc:creator>MHB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 12:00:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=4175#comment-17218</guid>
		<description>Anthony

Just to be clear it was the Bush administration that killed the .xxx extension.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anthony</p>
<p>Just to be clear it was the Bush administration that killed the .xxx extension.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anthony</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2009/07/08/techcrunch-cm-start-making-money-off-domain-typos-soon/comment-page-1/#comment-17217</link>
		<dc:creator>Anthony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 11:30:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=4175#comment-17217</guid>
		<description>Marv .sex should have been implemented along time ago and transition the adult

.coms to it ... imho ... the government is too busy with other things instead of 

protecting our children.

Anthony</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Marv .sex should have been implemented along time ago and transition the adult</p>
<p>.coms to it &#8230; imho &#8230; the government is too busy with other things instead of </p>
<p>protecting our children.</p>
<p>Anthony</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MHB</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2009/07/08/techcrunch-cm-start-making-money-off-domain-typos-soon/comment-page-1/#comment-17214</link>
		<dc:creator>MHB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 10:41:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=4175#comment-17214</guid>
		<description>Marv

You will see applications for .sex and .xxx next year when ICANN starts accepting the new g&#039;TLD&#039;s, however its questionable if any will be approved:

http://www.thedomains.com/2008/06/28/how-can-xxxsex-extension-be-ok-now/


Of course there is still litigation over the reject .xxx application from several years ago:

http://www.thedomains.com/2009/06/15/xxx-extension-heading-to-arbitration/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Marv</p>
<p>You will see applications for .sex and .xxx next year when ICANN starts accepting the new g&#8217;TLD&#8217;s, however its questionable if any will be approved:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.thedomains.com/2008/06/28/how-can-xxxsex-extension-be-ok-now/" rel="nofollow">http://www.thedomains.com/2008/06/28/how-can-xxxsex-extension-be-ok-now/</a></p>
<p>Of course there is still litigation over the reject .xxx application from several years ago:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.thedomains.com/2009/06/15/xxx-extension-heading-to-arbitration/" rel="nofollow">http://www.thedomains.com/2009/06/15/xxx-extension-heading-to-arbitration/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: marv</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2009/07/08/techcrunch-cm-start-making-money-off-domain-typos-soon/comment-page-1/#comment-17206</link>
		<dc:creator>marv</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 03:48:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=4175#comment-17206</guid>
		<description>When do we see .sex TLD ? This would be a great way to filter out all the nasty shit that our kids get exposed to.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When do we see .sex TLD ? This would be a great way to filter out all the nasty shit that our kids get exposed to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JL</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2009/07/08/techcrunch-cm-start-making-money-off-domain-typos-soon/comment-page-1/#comment-17086</link>
		<dc:creator>JL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 17:18:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=4175#comment-17086</guid>
		<description>Bait and Switch, a classical scam.

I&#039;ve contacted BBB and complained for both eNom and NameJet.
Last resort would be to call my credit card company and put those two to be under illegal company..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bait and Switch, a classical scam.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve contacted BBB and complained for both eNom and NameJet.<br />
Last resort would be to call my credit card company and put those two to be under illegal company..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Comments on the .CM Landrush &#124; Hosting and domain names</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2009/07/08/techcrunch-cm-start-making-money-off-domain-typos-soon/comment-page-1/#comment-16252</link>
		<dc:creator>Comments on the .CM Landrush &#124; Hosting and domain names</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 14:59:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=4175#comment-16252</guid>
		<description>[...] response to TechCrunch and Mike Berkens, I&#8217;d like to comment on the .CM landrush. Enom together with NameJet is now offering .CM [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] response to TechCrunch and Mike Berkens, I&#8217;d like to comment on the .CM landrush. Enom together with NameJet is now offering .CM [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reece Berg</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2009/07/08/techcrunch-cm-start-making-money-off-domain-typos-soon/comment-page-1/#comment-16251</link>
		<dc:creator>Reece Berg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 14:54:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=4175#comment-16251</guid>
		<description>I should have done this when I first read the article but anyway, just posted a link on the TC article to TheDomains -- hopefully at least a few of their readers will see the opinion of real domainers is quite different from that of cybersquatters.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I should have done this when I first read the article but anyway, just posted a link on the TC article to TheDomains &#8212; hopefully at least a few of their readers will see the opinion of real domainers is quite different from that of cybersquatters.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anthony</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2009/07/08/techcrunch-cm-start-making-money-off-domain-typos-soon/comment-page-1/#comment-16249</link>
		<dc:creator>Anthony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 14:48:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=4175#comment-16249</guid>
		<description>Tim Davids ... remember the owner of God.com also has Satan.com :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tim Davids &#8230; remember the owner of God.com also has Satan.com <img src='http://www.thedomains.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Comments on the .CM Landrush &#124; Dominik Mueller</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2009/07/08/techcrunch-cm-start-making-money-off-domain-typos-soon/comment-page-1/#comment-16247</link>
		<dc:creator>Comments on the .CM Landrush &#124; Dominik Mueller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 13:59:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=4175#comment-16247</guid>
		<description>[...] While at it, why not follow me on Twitter, too? Thanks for visiting!In response to TechCrunch and Mike Berkens, I&#8217;d like to comment on the .CM landrush. Enom together with NameJet is now offering .CM [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] While at it, why not follow me on Twitter, too? Thanks for visiting!In response to TechCrunch and Mike Berkens, I&#8217;d like to comment on the .CM landrush. Enom together with NameJet is now offering .CM [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
