<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mark Cuban: Free=Failure</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thedomains.com/2009/07/07/mark-cuban-freefailure/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2009/07/07/mark-cuban-freefailure/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 18:49:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: adult merchant account</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2009/07/07/mark-cuban-freefailure/comment-page-1/#comment-17394</link>
		<dc:creator>adult merchant account</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 15:30:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=4133#comment-17394</guid>
		<description>I also added your site in my rss reader great post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I also added your site in my rss reader great post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J.R. Jackson (Internet's $8-Million Man)</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2009/07/07/mark-cuban-freefailure/comment-page-1/#comment-16199</link>
		<dc:creator>J.R. Jackson (Internet's $8-Million Man)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 16:36:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=4133#comment-16199</guid>
		<description>Very good article.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very good article.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DOmainer</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2009/07/07/mark-cuban-freefailure/comment-page-1/#comment-16188</link>
		<dc:creator>DOmainer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 09:50:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=4133#comment-16188</guid>
		<description>I think SOME of you are missing the point of what Mark Cuban means. I have often wondered how Twitter stays in business. Give it time it will be operating just like a Google.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think SOME of you are missing the point of what Mark Cuban means. I have often wondered how Twitter stays in business. Give it time it will be operating just like a Google.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MHB</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2009/07/07/mark-cuban-freefailure/comment-page-1/#comment-16168</link>
		<dc:creator>MHB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 01:11:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=4133#comment-16168</guid>
		<description>FX

Adult sites have been doing this for 10 years or more.

Adult always leads the way on the net.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FX</p>
<p>Adult sites have been doing this for 10 years or more.</p>
<p>Adult always leads the way on the net.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FX</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2009/07/07/mark-cuban-freefailure/comment-page-1/#comment-16160</link>
		<dc:creator>FX</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 23:42:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=4133#comment-16160</guid>
		<description>i wish more sites would offer free trial option slamming it into a recurring + cross sells.   freeCreditreport.com is the second most successful free site after AOL.com software.   Like i said earlier we&#039;re off topic here and this has nothing to do with Cuban.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i wish more sites would offer free trial option slamming it into a recurring + cross sells.   freeCreditreport.com is the second most successful free site after AOL.com software.   Like i said earlier we&#8217;re off topic here and this has nothing to do with Cuban.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cartoonz</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2009/07/07/mark-cuban-freefailure/comment-page-1/#comment-16154</link>
		<dc:creator>Cartoonz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 21:25:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=4133#comment-16154</guid>
		<description>&quot;FreeCreditReport.com has done just fine over the years...&quot;
... by not being &quot;free&quot; at all! 
Those &quot;credit watcher&quot; charges add  up... they make a mint off those monthly billings and you must sign  up for that to get your report.  Sure, you can cancel it before the  first billing cycle but it is amazing how high the percentage is of  folks that don&#039;t.

Google doesn&#039;t really belong on the &quot;freemium&quot; list, it has done  quite well charging advertisers.  And, unlike the social networking  sites mentioned - people click those ads.  If they didn&#039;t, most of  us would be in another line of work.... however much Google has  
degraded our payments.

But as to the basic premise - the social networking &quot;freemium&quot; (I  love that word.. haha) sites like MyFace, Twaddle, Mugbook...  what  Cuban&#039;s saying really does ring true.  Ad revenue sucks big time in  comparison to their user base because none of the users are there  for any other reason than their own - to use the &quot;free&quot; service.

Facebook will fall out of fashion soon enough, that cycle has been  demonstrated many times.

Some newer, more feature rich, hipper, slicker, cooler platform will  come out and folks will then flock to that.

Problem is... it will need to be free also in order to get the user  base... and around the wheel the hamsters go again...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;FreeCreditReport.com has done just fine over the years&#8230;&#8221;<br />
&#8230; by not being &#8220;free&#8221; at all!<br />
Those &#8220;credit watcher&#8221; charges add  up&#8230; they make a mint off those monthly billings and you must sign  up for that to get your report.  Sure, you can cancel it before the  first billing cycle but it is amazing how high the percentage is of  folks that don&#8217;t.</p>
<p>Google doesn&#8217;t really belong on the &#8220;freemium&#8221; list, it has done  quite well charging advertisers.  And, unlike the social networking  sites mentioned &#8211; people click those ads.  If they didn&#8217;t, most of  us would be in another line of work&#8230;. however much Google has<br />
degraded our payments.</p>
<p>But as to the basic premise &#8211; the social networking &#8220;freemium&#8221; (I  love that word.. haha) sites like MyFace, Twaddle, Mugbook&#8230;  what  Cuban&#8217;s saying really does ring true.  Ad revenue sucks big time in  comparison to their user base because none of the users are there  for any other reason than their own &#8211; to use the &#8220;free&#8221; service.</p>
<p>Facebook will fall out of fashion soon enough, that cycle has been  demonstrated many times.</p>
<p>Some newer, more feature rich, hipper, slicker, cooler platform will  come out and folks will then flock to that.</p>
<p>Problem is&#8230; it will need to be free also in order to get the user  base&#8230; and around the wheel the hamsters go again&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DotWTF.com</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2009/07/07/mark-cuban-freefailure/comment-page-1/#comment-16152</link>
		<dc:creator>DotWTF.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 20:24:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=4133#comment-16152</guid>
		<description>I agree with that, I think he is focused on Social Media don&#039;t you ? Maybe he is looking at investing and trying to bring the valuation down, never know with Cuban a lot of disinformation in what he blogs a lot of the time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with that, I think he is focused on Social Media don&#8217;t you ? Maybe he is looking at investing and trying to bring the valuation down, never know with Cuban a lot of disinformation in what he blogs a lot of the time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MHB</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2009/07/07/mark-cuban-freefailure/comment-page-1/#comment-16151</link>
		<dc:creator>MHB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 19:49:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=4133#comment-16151</guid>
		<description>Dot

A lot of free sites have gone away and plenty of companies that charged for their products have gone away as well.

That is way blanket statements don&#039;t work for business.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dot</p>
<p>A lot of free sites have gone away and plenty of companies that charged for their products have gone away as well.</p>
<p>That is way blanket statements don&#8217;t work for business.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DotWTF.com</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2009/07/07/mark-cuban-freefailure/comment-page-1/#comment-16150</link>
		<dc:creator>DotWTF.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 19:37:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=4133#comment-16150</guid>
		<description>Well Google is not Free they make a lot of money in a lot of areas to call Google free is naive IMO to search is free but they want that so you click on sponsored links that are not free, Now Twitter needs to find a way to make money or they will have problems IMO. 

IMO Michael you cannot say he is wrong in a blanket statement either, a lot of free cool sites have gone away and users get pissed each time. 

BrightCove ran a free version then did away with that, pissed a lot of people off.  Homestead which is still doing well and sold out to a bigger company took a lot of flack for doing away with free.  You see a lot of web 2.0 companies who are still around did away with the free component VideoEGG for one. 

I think you need to have some plan toward getting $$$.  Facebook has two large groups that are about &quot;We will never pay&quot; If I am Facebook with 200 million members I would rather have 50 million paying $4.99 a month and screw the other 150 million, bottom line if the site is such a big part of their life a good percentage will eventually pay the $4.99 rather than become a social outcast or affect their business. Again IMO</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well Google is not Free they make a lot of money in a lot of areas to call Google free is naive IMO to search is free but they want that so you click on sponsored links that are not free, Now Twitter needs to find a way to make money or they will have problems IMO. </p>
<p>IMO Michael you cannot say he is wrong in a blanket statement either, a lot of free cool sites have gone away and users get pissed each time. </p>
<p>BrightCove ran a free version then did away with that, pissed a lot of people off.  Homestead which is still doing well and sold out to a bigger company took a lot of flack for doing away with free.  You see a lot of web 2.0 companies who are still around did away with the free component VideoEGG for one. </p>
<p>I think you need to have some plan toward getting $$$.  Facebook has two large groups that are about &#8220;We will never pay&#8221; If I am Facebook with 200 million members I would rather have 50 million paying $4.99 a month and screw the other 150 million, bottom line if the site is such a big part of their life a good percentage will eventually pay the $4.99 rather than become a social outcast or affect their business. Again IMO</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jody</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2009/07/07/mark-cuban-freefailure/comment-page-1/#comment-16140</link>
		<dc:creator>Jody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 14:21:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=4133#comment-16140</guid>
		<description>Basic TV, AM/FM radio...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Basic TV, AM/FM radio&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
