<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bing.com PPC Clicks Up 13% Since The Switch From Live.com</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thedomains.com/2009/06/23/bingcom-ppc-clicks-up-13-since-the-switch-from-livecom/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2009/06/23/bingcom-ppc-clicks-up-13-since-the-switch-from-livecom/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 22:59:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Arsento</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2009/06/23/bingcom-ppc-clicks-up-13-since-the-switch-from-livecom/comment-page-1/#comment-17344</link>
		<dc:creator>Arsento</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 13:58:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=3895#comment-17344</guid>
		<description>Very interesting and amusing subject. I read with great pleasure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very interesting and amusing subject. I read with great pleasure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Domain Investor</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2009/06/23/bingcom-ppc-clicks-up-13-since-the-switch-from-livecom/comment-page-1/#comment-15650</link>
		<dc:creator>Domain Investor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 17:05:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=3895#comment-15650</guid>
		<description>MS spent a lot money on bringing Bing to market.
I&#039;m not sure the traffic/searches are sustainable.

There have been a lot of discussion between MS and Yahoo about working together.

Wall St. stills think it was a mistake that MS did not buy Y.
But, that is a discussion for another day.

Yahoo stockholder meeting is tomorrow.  Maybe, we will learn tomorrow if MS/Bing and Yahoo are working together again.

MS confuses me.  ???</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MS spent a lot money on bringing Bing to market.<br />
I&#8217;m not sure the traffic/searches are sustainable.</p>
<p>There have been a lot of discussion between MS and Yahoo about working together.</p>
<p>Wall St. stills think it was a mistake that MS did not buy Y.<br />
But, that is a discussion for another day.</p>
<p>Yahoo stockholder meeting is tomorrow.  Maybe, we will learn tomorrow if MS/Bing and Yahoo are working together again.</p>
<p>MS confuses me.  ???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bing.com Says PPC Clicks Are Up 13%, Are You Capitalizing? &#124; Affiliate By Night</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2009/06/23/bingcom-ppc-clicks-up-13-since-the-switch-from-livecom/comment-page-1/#comment-15644</link>
		<dc:creator>Bing.com Says PPC Clicks Are Up 13%, Are You Capitalizing? &#124; Affiliate By Night</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 12:53:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=3895#comment-15644</guid>
		<description>[...] According to TheDomains.com, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] According to TheDomains.com, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kristin McLeod</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2009/06/23/bingcom-ppc-clicks-up-13-since-the-switch-from-livecom/comment-page-1/#comment-15637</link>
		<dc:creator>Kristin McLeod</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 06:14:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=3895#comment-15637</guid>
		<description>Three is a lot of speculation regarding how long this increased traffic will hold.  Hitwise has put out a few reports regarding the nature of the Bing traffic (sample here: http://tinyurl.com/nqu3ll), which seems to be a lot of curiosity clicks but not as many repeat users as I&#039;m sure they would like.  As a search marketer I&#039;m glad to see more attention being paid to engines other than Google, but I&#039;m extremely skeptical as to how long this will last.  I just don&#039;t think Bing is offering anything innovative that will truly increase their market share in the long term.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Three is a lot of speculation regarding how long this increased traffic will hold.  Hitwise has put out a few reports regarding the nature of the Bing traffic (sample here: <a href="http://tinyurl.com/nqu3ll)" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/nqu3ll)</a>, which seems to be a lot of curiosity clicks but not as many repeat users as I&#8217;m sure they would like.  As a search marketer I&#8217;m glad to see more attention being paid to engines other than Google, but I&#8217;m extremely skeptical as to how long this will last.  I just don&#8217;t think Bing is offering anything innovative that will truly increase their market share in the long term.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dnclips.com - Domain feeds and more</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2009/06/23/bingcom-ppc-clicks-up-13-since-the-switch-from-livecom/comment-page-1/#comment-15636</link>
		<dc:creator>dnclips.com - Domain feeds and more</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 05:35:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=3895#comment-15636</guid>
		<description>Microsoft might have learned their lesson with rebranding hotmail, which turned out to be a big flop. So this time they started something fresh. So I think what they did with bing is a good strategy, than rebranding live.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Microsoft might have learned their lesson with rebranding hotmail, which turned out to be a big flop. So this time they started something fresh. So I think what they did with bing is a good strategy, than rebranding live.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sara</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2009/06/23/bingcom-ppc-clicks-up-13-since-the-switch-from-livecom/comment-page-1/#comment-15633</link>
		<dc:creator>Sara</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 23:29:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=3895#comment-15633</guid>
		<description>Pretty cool post. I just found your site and wanted to say 
that I have really liked browsing your posts. Anyway 
I&#039;ll be subscribing to your feed and I hope you write again soon!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pretty cool post. I just found your site and wanted to say<br />
that I have really liked browsing your posts. Anyway<br />
I&#8217;ll be subscribing to your feed and I hope you write again soon!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank Bo</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2009/06/23/bingcom-ppc-clicks-up-13-since-the-switch-from-livecom/comment-page-1/#comment-15632</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank Bo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 23:20:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=3895#comment-15632</guid>
		<description>@Classifieds Theme

No, Live.com isn&#039;t a category killer name b/c &quot;Live&quot; is not a category.  A good category killing domain name must be specific and unambiguous (e.g. Cars.com or Furniture.com).  The term &quot;Live&quot; is ubiquitous in our culture, and therefore could mean anything.  At least &quot;Bing&quot; is somewhat unique and with proper branding will come to have its own meaning (see Google).   It&#039;s not a strategy I&#039;d recommend for non-mega corporations, but for Microsoft, I don&#039;t think it&#039;s a bad choice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Classifieds Theme</p>
<p>No, Live.com isn&#8217;t a category killer name b/c &#8220;Live&#8221; is not a category.  A good category killing domain name must be specific and unambiguous (e.g. Cars.com or Furniture.com).  The term &#8220;Live&#8221; is ubiquitous in our culture, and therefore could mean anything.  At least &#8220;Bing&#8221; is somewhat unique and with proper branding will come to have its own meaning (see Google).   It&#8217;s not a strategy I&#8217;d recommend for non-mega corporations, but for Microsoft, I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s a bad choice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David J Castello</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2009/06/23/bingcom-ppc-clicks-up-13-since-the-switch-from-livecom/comment-page-1/#comment-15631</link>
		<dc:creator>David J Castello</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 22:48:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=3895#comment-15631</guid>
		<description>Live.com is a better name.  On the other hand,  I&#039;ve never seen a TV ad for Live.com and have seen continuous ads for Bing.com here in Southern CA.  It appears that Microsoft has undertaken a powerful media campaign for Bing.com and it remains to be seen if the search engine will continue on an upward trajectory after the campaign stops.  13% improvement is not that impressive to me considering how hard they&#039;re currently pushing it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Live.com is a better name.  On the other hand,  I&#8217;ve never seen a TV ad for Live.com and have seen continuous ads for Bing.com here in Southern CA.  It appears that Microsoft has undertaken a powerful media campaign for Bing.com and it remains to be seen if the search engine will continue on an upward trajectory after the campaign stops.  13% improvement is not that impressive to me considering how hard they&#8217;re currently pushing it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Classifieds Theme</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2009/06/23/bingcom-ppc-clicks-up-13-since-the-switch-from-livecom/comment-page-1/#comment-15629</link>
		<dc:creator>Classifieds Theme</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 22:01:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=3895#comment-15629</guid>
		<description>isn&#039;t Live.com a category Killer domain name,  so why is Microsoft more successful with  name like bing.com? Why did they rebrand and what lessons can we learn from this, and apply to the domain industry?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>isn&#8217;t Live.com a category Killer domain name,  so why is Microsoft more successful with  name like bing.com? Why did they rebrand and what lessons can we learn from this, and apply to the domain industry?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
