<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Our Picks,  Pans and Predictions For The Rick Latona TRAFFIC Auction &amp; Why SmartPhones.com Is NOT &#8220;The Deal Of The Century&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thedomains.com/2009/04/27/our-picks-pans-and-predictions-for-the-rick-latona-traffic-auction/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2009/04/27/our-picks-pans-and-predictions-for-the-rick-latona-traffic-auction/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 20:38:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: MHB</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2009/04/27/our-picks-pans-and-predictions-for-the-rick-latona-traffic-auction/comment-page-1/#comment-13450</link>
		<dc:creator>MHB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 14:28:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=3119#comment-13450</guid>
		<description>D

I think those in the industry that love this domain, may bid on it, so I wouldn&#039;t expect it to go unsold</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>D</p>
<p>I think those in the industry that love this domain, may bid on it, so I wouldn&#8217;t expect it to go unsold</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: D</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2009/04/27/our-picks-pans-and-predictions-for-the-rick-latona-traffic-auction/comment-page-1/#comment-13408</link>
		<dc:creator>D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 04:09:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=3119#comment-13408</guid>
		<description>Smartphones.com will not sell even for $50K imho</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Smartphones.com will not sell even for $50K imho</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: owen frager</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2009/04/27/our-picks-pans-and-predictions-for-the-rick-latona-traffic-auction/comment-page-1/#comment-13381</link>
		<dc:creator>owen frager</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 23:58:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=3119#comment-13381</guid>
		<description>Forget smartphones- the bigger money is in the domains as names for iPhone apps. Example of what MLL could be:
http://fragerfactor.blogspot.com/2009/04/mlb-app-is-nearing-1-million-revenue.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Forget smartphones- the bigger money is in the domains as names for iPhone apps. Example of what MLL could be:<br />
<a href="http://fragerfactor.blogspot.com/2009/04/mlb-app-is-nearing-1-million-revenue.html" rel="nofollow">http://fragerfactor.blogspot.com/2009/04/mlb-app-is-nearing-1-million-revenue.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jp</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2009/04/27/our-picks-pans-and-predictions-for-the-rick-latona-traffic-auction/comment-page-1/#comment-13358</link>
		<dc:creator>jp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 20:19:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=3119#comment-13358</guid>
		<description>One of my biggest concearns for SmartPhones.com is the longevity of the name. Smart Phones is a term right now, but will they still be called that in 5 more years, or will there be a new term coined? When I buy names I think about &quot;how many years&quot; am I buying the name at. Wouldn&#039;t want to buy a name at 10 years if the world 5 years from now dosen&#039;t have room for my domain name.

In general I avoid technology domains for just this reason. SmartPhones.com is a great name though if you&#039;ve got a good plan on how to get in, make $$$$, and then get out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of my biggest concearns for SmartPhones.com is the longevity of the name. Smart Phones is a term right now, but will they still be called that in 5 more years, or will there be a new term coined? When I buy names I think about &#8220;how many years&#8221; am I buying the name at. Wouldn&#8217;t want to buy a name at 10 years if the world 5 years from now dosen&#8217;t have room for my domain name.</p>
<p>In general I avoid technology domains for just this reason. SmartPhones.com is a great name though if you&#8217;ve got a good plan on how to get in, make $$$$, and then get out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2009/04/27/our-picks-pans-and-predictions-for-the-rick-latona-traffic-auction/comment-page-1/#comment-13338</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 15:55:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=3119#comment-13338</guid>
		<description>There is a reason why smartphones.com is priced at 50K and you&#039;ve just pointed out.  The manufacturers and cell providers are very good at branding.  They don&#039;t brand by the generic term smartphone.  Smartphone is a geek term, not a consumer term. I don&#039;t think the name is worth even that much and believe the buyer will be stuck with a very expensive, under performing domain.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is a reason why smartphones.com is priced at 50K and you&#8217;ve just pointed out.  The manufacturers and cell providers are very good at branding.  They don&#8217;t brand by the generic term smartphone.  Smartphone is a geek term, not a consumer term. I don&#8217;t think the name is worth even that much and believe the buyer will be stuck with a very expensive, under performing domain.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

