<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Kentucky Seizes 141 Gambling Domains</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thedomains.com/2008/09/22/kentucky-seizes-gambling-domains/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2008/09/22/kentucky-seizes-gambling-domains/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 03:05:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: pitbullstew</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2008/09/22/kentucky-seizes-gambling-domains/comment-page-3/#comment-22744</link>
		<dc:creator>pitbullstew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 14:45:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=1031#comment-22744</guid>
		<description>I guess some of you guys dont get it? gvt has an interest in keeping society sfae from your industries conduct&gt; be that inter net gambling, gambling by the way is highlky regulated all across the land you know? Why even the FDA has gotten in on the act over PHARMA issues, if BIG PHARMA has to play by the regulatory rules why, pray tell does any one ever think that the rest of you arent under the same pervue as the rest of us?
Now I do understand that many are operating under some sort of personal ethics standards, though its hard to tell whois-who? 
(pun unitended)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess some of you guys dont get it? gvt has an interest in keeping society sfae from your industries conduct&gt; be that inter net gambling, gambling by the way is highlky regulated all across the land you know? Why even the FDA has gotten in on the act over PHARMA issues, if BIG PHARMA has to play by the regulatory rules why, pray tell does any one ever think that the rest of you arent under the same pervue as the rest of us?<br />
Now I do understand that many are operating under some sort of personal ethics standards, though its hard to tell whois-who?<br />
(pun unitended)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kentucky Domain Seizure Update: Oral Arguments Scheduled For October</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2008/09/22/kentucky-seizes-gambling-domains/comment-page-3/#comment-18970</link>
		<dc:creator>Kentucky Domain Seizure Update: Oral Arguments Scheduled For October</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 18:05:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=1031#comment-18970</guid>
		<description>[...] It was just about a year ago, last September 22nd, that the Governor of Kentucky ordered 141 gambling domains to be seized by the commonwealth. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] It was just about a year ago, last September 22nd, that the Governor of Kentucky ordered 141 gambling domains to be seized by the commonwealth. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2008/09/22/kentucky-seizes-gambling-domains/comment-page-3/#comment-15085</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2009 23:17:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=1031#comment-15085</guid>
		<description>Until now only the very popular USA casinos have been taken by the Kentucky government only to support their local gambling. Internet Freedom is in the hands of a local state?   


</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Until now only the very popular USA casinos have been taken by the Kentucky government only to support their local gambling. Internet Freedom is in the hands of a local state?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MHB</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2008/09/22/kentucky-seizes-gambling-domains/comment-page-3/#comment-11260</link>
		<dc:creator>MHB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 02:51:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=1031#comment-11260</guid>
		<description>UPDATE

The Kentucky Court of Appeals Overturned the Domain Seizure Order today

You can read more about it at:

http://www.thedomains.com/2009/01/20/kentucky-appeals-court-overturns-the-domain-seizure-order/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>UPDATE</p>
<p>The Kentucky Court of Appeals Overturned the Domain Seizure Order today</p>
<p>You can read more about it at:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.thedomains.com/2009/01/20/kentucky-appeals-court-overturns-the-domain-seizure-order/" rel="nofollow">http://www.thedomains.com/2009/01/20/kentucky-appeals-court-overturns-the-domain-seizure-order/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheDomains.com Turkeys Of The Year Award &#124; the domains &#124;</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2008/09/22/kentucky-seizes-gambling-domains/comment-page-3/#comment-10124</link>
		<dc:creator>TheDomains.com Turkeys Of The Year Award &#124; the domains &#124;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2008 14:36:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=1031#comment-10124</guid>
		<description>[...] The Governor of Kentucky, Steve Beshear for seizing domain names, he clearly had no jurisdiction over for purely political purposes and to support the states own [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Governor of Kentucky, Steve Beshear for seizing domain names, he clearly had no jurisdiction over for purely political purposes and to support the states own [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kentucky seizes gambling domains - DNXpert Domaining Forum</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2008/09/22/kentucky-seizes-gambling-domains/comment-page-3/#comment-9239</link>
		<dc:creator>Kentucky seizes gambling domains - DNXpert Domaining Forum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 11:21:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=1031#comment-9239</guid>
		<description>[...] seizes gambling domains     Have you heard this news might be a bit old?  Kentucky Seizes 141 Gambling Domains  Would like to know the validity of this action.  Your comments please.    __________________ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] seizes gambling domains     Have you heard this news might be a bit old?  Kentucky Seizes 141 Gambling Domains  Would like to know the validity of this action.  Your comments please.    __________________ [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FizWho &#187; ICA Responds to Kentucky Seizure of Gambling Domains</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2008/09/22/kentucky-seizes-gambling-domains/comment-page-3/#comment-8902</link>
		<dc:creator>FizWho &#187; ICA Responds to Kentucky Seizure of Gambling Domains</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2008 01:34:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=1031#comment-8902</guid>
		<description>[...] Commonwealth of Kentucky. Strangely enough, these two domains no longer resolve, going against the court order&#8217;s instructions which state the &#8220;domain configurations shall remain [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Commonwealth of Kentucky. Strangely enough, these two domains no longer resolve, going against the court order&#8217;s instructions which state the &#8220;domain configurations shall remain [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MHB</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2008/09/22/kentucky-seizes-gambling-domains/comment-page-3/#comment-8886</link>
		<dc:creator>MHB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 03:55:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=1031#comment-8886</guid>
		<description>Mad

We moved all our domains to a ICANN approved registry in the Bahamas.

We believe it is the only true &quot;offshore&quot; solution.

Check it out:

http://wwwNameVault.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mad</p>
<p>We moved all our domains to a ICANN approved registry in the Bahamas.</p>
<p>We believe it is the only true &#8220;offshore&#8221; solution.</p>
<p>Check it out:</p>
<p><a href="http://wwwNameVault.com" rel="nofollow">http://wwwNameVault.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mad Casino</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2008/09/22/kentucky-seizes-gambling-domains/comment-page-3/#comment-8883</link>
		<dc:creator>Mad Casino</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 03:26:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=1031#comment-8883</guid>
		<description>All US registrars are a waste of time and will not speak... wasz recomended this link by several IMEGA memebers, http://www.safenames.net/gamingwebsites.aspx, gave them a call, UK Registrar, governed by UK legislation, Fulltiltpoker, Bodog and many more use them and transferred to them all my domains that are not on the Kentucky list, Godaddy and Netsol have locked my domains so i am playing follow the leader here.  Got em all protected at Safenames and I see that eceryone is registering .eu domains with these guys with a proxy service. This is not the endbut the beginning, if several states get together then it will become a federal matter so good bye USA and hello England. Let me know if anyone comes up with any more suggestions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All US registrars are a waste of time and will not speak&#8230; wasz recomended this link by several IMEGA memebers, <a href="http://www.safenames.net/gamingwebsites.aspx" rel="nofollow">http://www.safenames.net/gamingwebsites.aspx</a>, gave them a call, UK Registrar, governed by UK legislation, Fulltiltpoker, Bodog and many more use them and transferred to them all my domains that are not on the Kentucky list, Godaddy and Netsol have locked my domains so i am playing follow the leader here.  Got em all protected at Safenames and I see that eceryone is registering .eu domains with these guys with a proxy service. This is not the endbut the beginning, if several states get together then it will become a federal matter so good bye USA and hello England. Let me know if anyone comes up with any more suggestions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FizWho &#187; Kentucks Seizes 141 Gambling Domain Names</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2008/09/22/kentucky-seizes-gambling-domains/comment-page-3/#comment-8866</link>
		<dc:creator>FizWho &#187; Kentucks Seizes 141 Gambling Domain Names</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 21:22:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=1031#comment-8866</guid>
		<description>[...] domains are simply parked websites with no recent history of taking any bets.  Head on over to The Domains for more information on the story and a full list of the seized [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] domains are simply parked websites with no recent history of taking any bets.  Head on over to The Domains for more information on the story and a full list of the seized [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
