<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SnapNames Get Patent for &#8220;Domain Acquistion and Management&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thedomains.com/2008/08/27/snapnames-get-patent-for-domain-acquistion-and-management/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2008/08/27/snapnames-get-patent-for-domain-acquistion-and-management/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 20:38:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: t2</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2008/08/27/snapnames-get-patent-for-domain-acquistion-and-management/comment-page-1/#comment-11286</link>
		<dc:creator>t2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 00:15:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=940#comment-11286</guid>
		<description>so what about the silly unenforceable patent... but Snapnames on the other hand is so stupid I&#039;ll be able to easily avoid them like the plague for being so morally and mentally bankrupt.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>so what about the silly unenforceable patent&#8230; but Snapnames on the other hand is so stupid I&#8217;ll be able to easily avoid them like the plague for being so morally and mentally bankrupt.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cartoonz</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2008/08/27/snapnames-get-patent-for-domain-acquistion-and-management/comment-page-1/#comment-7703</link>
		<dc:creator>Cartoonz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 02:05:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=940#comment-7703</guid>
		<description>2 words on this -  PRIOR ART

Dotser has it, so do I.

unenforceable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>2 words on this &#8211;  PRIOR ART</p>
<p>Dotser has it, so do I.</p>
<p>unenforceable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2008/08/27/snapnames-get-patent-for-domain-acquistion-and-management/comment-page-1/#comment-7684</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 05:38:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=940#comment-7684</guid>
		<description>&quot;A patent is a set of exclusive rights granted by a state to an inventor or his assignee for a fixed period of time in exchange for a disclosure of an invention.&quot; Wikipedia

What exactly is the invention here? Some software that pings registrars and checks if a certain domain is available at a specific time preset for deletion by ICANN and the registrar? Maybe it&#039;s on the uniqueness of the software? You can pick any platform or any computer language and build the same application.

I can tell you it&#039;s not much of a patent if i just figured it out and owned similar software long ago.

I agree with David. I think the staff at USPTO is as tech savvy as my grandma and that&#039;s why they gave them the patent. It should be worthless.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;A patent is a set of exclusive rights granted by a state to an inventor or his assignee for a fixed period of time in exchange for a disclosure of an invention.&#8221; Wikipedia</p>
<p>What exactly is the invention here? Some software that pings registrars and checks if a certain domain is available at a specific time preset for deletion by ICANN and the registrar? Maybe it&#8217;s on the uniqueness of the software? You can pick any platform or any computer language and build the same application.</p>
<p>I can tell you it&#8217;s not much of a patent if i just figured it out and owned similar software long ago.</p>
<p>I agree with David. I think the staff at USPTO is as tech savvy as my grandma and that&#8217;s why they gave them the patent. It should be worthless.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Damir</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2008/08/27/snapnames-get-patent-for-domain-acquistion-and-management/comment-page-1/#comment-7679</link>
		<dc:creator>Damir</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 00:27:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=940#comment-7679</guid>
		<description>What a patent - thinks that make you go W.T.F.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a patent &#8211; thinks that make you go W.T.F.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pure</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2008/08/27/snapnames-get-patent-for-domain-acquistion-and-management/comment-page-1/#comment-7675</link>
		<dc:creator>Pure</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 17:00:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=940#comment-7675</guid>
		<description>This patent is bunk. Go ask the people that Amazon has sued for the totally original idea of a &quot;1 click checkout&quot; just how likely it is these guys will act like good corporate citizens in their stewardship of a baseless patent. You&#039;re right David, this patent is as absurd as you think it is. It only highlights the woefully inadequate job the USPTO has been doing to protect the public from unfair patents which is as much their job (actually more) as it is to protect the intellectual property of actual inventors.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This patent is bunk. Go ask the people that Amazon has sued for the totally original idea of a &#8220;1 click checkout&#8221; just how likely it is these guys will act like good corporate citizens in their stewardship of a baseless patent. You&#8217;re right David, this patent is as absurd as you think it is. It only highlights the woefully inadequate job the USPTO has been doing to protect the public from unfair patents which is as much their job (actually more) as it is to protect the intellectual property of actual inventors.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MHB</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2008/08/27/snapnames-get-patent-for-domain-acquistion-and-management/comment-page-1/#comment-7674</link>
		<dc:creator>MHB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 15:26:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=940#comment-7674</guid>
		<description>Tony

I don&#039;t know about that.

I don&#039;t think it would effect those registrar that drop domains to certain services by contract.

However, they might be able to get all the normal drop domains or sue for licensing fees for their patent</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tony</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know about that.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think it would effect those registrar that drop domains to certain services by contract.</p>
<p>However, they might be able to get all the normal drop domains or sue for licensing fees for their patent</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony Lam, DMD</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2008/08/27/snapnames-get-patent-for-domain-acquistion-and-management/comment-page-1/#comment-7673</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony Lam, DMD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 15:14:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=940#comment-7673</guid>
		<description>It&#039;d be easier for domainers if Snapnames could force all expired domain auctions to go through them with this patent.  Looking through one auction house is better than FIVE (Pool, Snapnames, Namejet, Tucows/Afternic, TDNAM).  

Just wishful thinking on my part...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;d be easier for domainers if Snapnames could force all expired domain auctions to go through them with this patent.  Looking through one auction house is better than FIVE (Pool, Snapnames, Namejet, Tucows/Afternic, TDNAM).  </p>
<p>Just wishful thinking on my part&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MHB</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2008/08/27/snapnames-get-patent-for-domain-acquistion-and-management/comment-page-1/#comment-7672</link>
		<dc:creator>MHB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 15:06:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=940#comment-7672</guid>
		<description>David

I think i&#039;ll pass on the .pro even at $25.

waiting for .lawyer or .attorney or when the new extensions come out</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David</p>
<p>I think i&#8217;ll pass on the .pro even at $25.</p>
<p>waiting for .lawyer or .attorney or when the new extensions come out</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: david</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2008/08/27/snapnames-get-patent-for-domain-acquistion-and-management/comment-page-1/#comment-7671</link>
		<dc:creator>david</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 14:59:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=940#comment-7671</guid>
		<description>how bout changing that name to MHB.JD?

even better, how bout MHB.JD.PRO?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>how bout changing that name to MHB.JD?</p>
<p>even better, how bout MHB.JD.PRO?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MHB</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2008/08/27/snapnames-get-patent-for-domain-acquistion-and-management/comment-page-1/#comment-7670</link>
		<dc:creator>MHB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 14:58:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=940#comment-7670</guid>
		<description>Patent law is a very big specialty and an area of law in which I did not practice.

This is what I can tell you.

Its a costly process.

Its a time consuming process.  The fact that the old owners filed for it and it just got granted will tell you it took a while.

Like a trademark application there is a period in the process where company or individuals can object to dispute the patent.

There are companies whose only business is to get patents granted then sue those that they deem infringe on the patent.  Some of these companies own tens of thousands of patents and make substantial income from licensing its patents and in damages through lawsuits</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Patent law is a very big specialty and an area of law in which I did not practice.</p>
<p>This is what I can tell you.</p>
<p>Its a costly process.</p>
<p>Its a time consuming process.  The fact that the old owners filed for it and it just got granted will tell you it took a while.</p>
<p>Like a trademark application there is a period in the process where company or individuals can object to dispute the patent.</p>
<p>There are companies whose only business is to get patents granted then sue those that they deem infringe on the patent.  Some of these companies own tens of thousands of patents and make substantial income from licensing its patents and in damages through lawsuits</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

