http://www.thedomains.com/2008/08/09/google-loses-1-billion-on-aol/ Fri, 12 Mar 2010 22:23:50 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1 hourly 1 http://www.thedomains.com/2008/08/09/google-loses-1-billion-on-aol/comment-page-1/#comment-7270 Google Loses $1 Billion On AOL? Sun, 10 Aug 2008 19:32:21 +0000 http://www.thedomains.com/?p=872#comment-7270 [...] Original Right Pundits [...] [...] Original Right Pundits [...]

]]> http://www.thedomains.com/2008/08/09/google-loses-1-billion-on-aol/comment-page-1/#comment-7268 Google Loses $1 Billion On AOL? Sun, 10 Aug 2008 19:30:04 +0000 http://www.thedomains.com/?p=872#comment-7268 [...] Indian Stock Market Copyright © stock sc_project=3641399; sc_invisible=1; [...] [...] Indian Stock Market Copyright © stock sc_project=3641399; sc_invisible=1; [...]

]]> http://www.thedomains.com/2008/08/09/google-loses-1-billion-on-aol/comment-page-1/#comment-7267 Google Loses $1 Billion On AOL? Sun, 10 Aug 2008 19:17:45 +0000 http://www.thedomains.com/?p=872#comment-7267 [...] Original JVoices: your jewish wakeup call [...] [...] Original JVoices: your jewish wakeup call [...]

]]> http://www.thedomains.com/2008/08/09/google-loses-1-billion-on-aol/comment-page-1/#comment-7262 Damir Sun, 10 Aug 2008 10:14:29 +0000 http://www.thedomains.com/?p=872#comment-7262 Great info - the respons posted by Tony is straight to the point - sometimes you have to lose on one side (money or something else) to gain on the other (money or competative advantage). Great info – the respons posted by Tony is straight to the point – sometimes you have to lose on one side (money or something else) to gain on the other (money or competative advantage).

]]> http://www.thedomains.com/2008/08/09/google-loses-1-billion-on-aol/comment-page-1/#comment-7259 Tony Lam, DMD Sun, 10 Aug 2008 05:07:11 +0000 http://www.thedomains.com/?p=872#comment-7259 A big part of the reason they made that investment in AOL was to prevent AOL from doing an ad deal with MSFT or Yahoo at that time. It was more a strategic move than an investment per se. So yes they may have lost some on their investment on paper but they gained a strategic advantage so I won't feel too bad for Googs. A big part of the reason they made that investment in AOL was to prevent AOL from doing an ad deal with MSFT or Yahoo at that time. It was more a strategic move than an investment per se. So yes they may have lost some on their investment on paper but they gained a strategic advantage so I won’t feel too bad for Googs.

]]>