<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Type of Lawsuit is Brewing Against Domainers and Advertisers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thedomains.com/2008/08/05/new-type-of-lawsuit-is-brewing-against-domainers-and-advertisers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2008/08/05/new-type-of-lawsuit-is-brewing-against-domainers-and-advertisers/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 02:22:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Websites tagged "starwood" on Postsaver</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2008/08/05/new-type-of-lawsuit-is-brewing-against-domainers-and-advertisers/comment-page-1/#comment-7420</link>
		<dc:creator>Websites tagged "starwood" on Postsaver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Aug 2008 05:45:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=851#comment-7420</guid>
		<description>[...] - New Type of Lawsuit is Brewing Against Domainers and Advertisers saved by HAO2Darts2008-08-10 - Announcing An Unrivaled Dimension of Luxury :: The St. Regis Dubai [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &#8211; New Type of Lawsuit is Brewing Against Domainers and Advertisers saved by HAO2Darts2008-08-10 &#8211; Announcing An Unrivaled Dimension of Luxury :: The St. Regis Dubai [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: My Choices: Targeted Traffic Award Nominations at Conceptualist.com, By Sahar Sarid</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2008/08/05/new-type-of-lawsuit-is-brewing-against-domainers-and-advertisers/comment-page-1/#comment-7296</link>
		<dc:creator>My Choices: Targeted Traffic Award Nominations at Conceptualist.com, By Sahar Sarid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 14:42:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=851#comment-7296</guid>
		<description>[...] all year long on his blog, from auction ethics, standing strong behind the ICA, to discussing many issues no other domainer would talk [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] all year long on his blog, from auction ethics, standing strong behind the ICA, to discussing many issues no other domainer would talk [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2008/08/05/new-type-of-lawsuit-is-brewing-against-domainers-and-advertisers/comment-page-1/#comment-7227</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 09:33:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=851#comment-7227</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;The group is attempting to stop what they call “scads”, scam ads that confuse consumers. And while the group’s target goes beyond trademark bidding, it does count such tactics as confusing to consumers.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

In one internet marketing forum I know, one  member said he&#039;s looking into filing a class-action lawsuit against Google precisely for that reason. Turns out some people have advertised in Adwords  things like &quot;name cheated me!&quot; or &quot;name scam&quot; promoting products of the member&#039;s competitors, though there&#039;s few that promote &lt;i&gt;his&lt;/i&gt; products.

Already some internet marketers (including the one I talked about above) started warning their affiliates of losing their accounts if they continued doing that. Of course, they can hardly do anything against non-affiliates using that tactic with Adwords.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>The group is attempting to stop what they call “scads”, scam ads that confuse consumers. And while the group’s target goes beyond trademark bidding, it does count such tactics as confusing to consumers.</p></blockquote>
<p>In one internet marketing forum I know, one  member said he&#8217;s looking into filing a class-action lawsuit against Google precisely for that reason. Turns out some people have advertised in Adwords  things like &#8220;name cheated me!&#8221; or &#8220;name scam&#8221; promoting products of the member&#8217;s competitors, though there&#8217;s few that promote <i>his</i> products.</p>
<p>Already some internet marketers (including the one I talked about above) started warning their affiliates of losing their accounts if they continued doing that. Of course, they can hardly do anything against non-affiliates using that tactic with Adwords.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Damir</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2008/08/05/new-type-of-lawsuit-is-brewing-against-domainers-and-advertisers/comment-page-1/#comment-7186</link>
		<dc:creator>Damir</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 14:08:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=851#comment-7186</guid>
		<description>Nice post - good luck there.

Domain names and business trademark - SHOULD be a separate issue.

Looking forward when ICANN approves all the different domain name extensions - that will be a legal nightmare.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice post &#8211; good luck there.</p>
<p>Domain names and business trademark &#8211; SHOULD be a separate issue.</p>
<p>Looking forward when ICANN approves all the different domain name extensions &#8211; that will be a legal nightmare.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
