<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ICANN Not Enforcing Rules Against Registrar Warehousing Because There Are No Rules</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thedomains.com/2008/07/06/icann-not-enforcing-rules-against-registrar-warehousing-because-there-are-no-rules/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2008/07/06/icann-not-enforcing-rules-against-registrar-warehousing-because-there-are-no-rules/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 05:44:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Frog Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Registrars can legally Warehouse</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2008/07/06/icann-not-enforcing-rules-against-registrar-warehousing-because-there-are-no-rules/comment-page-1/#comment-18508</link>
		<dc:creator>Frog Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Registrars can legally Warehouse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 21:02:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=741#comment-18508</guid>
		<description>[...] theDomains.com article is fairly amusing (if a bit [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] theDomains.com article is fairly amusing (if a bit [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2008/07/06/icann-not-enforcing-rules-against-registrar-warehousing-because-there-are-no-rules/comment-page-1/#comment-6540</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 06:12:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=741#comment-6540</guid>
		<description>more control and more rules. yea that&#039;s what we need.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>more control and more rules. yea that&#8217;s what we need.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MHB</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2008/07/06/icann-not-enforcing-rules-against-registrar-warehousing-because-there-are-no-rules/comment-page-1/#comment-6537</link>
		<dc:creator>MHB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 02:51:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=741#comment-6537</guid>
		<description>Guys

I&#039;m disappointed too.

I don&#039;t see how warehousing domains help anyone other than the registrars.

And I still say if NetSol did this for one day you would hear the outrage from all corners

On the other hand we cannot expect the ICA or any organization to represent our views 100% of the time.

We all disagree sometimes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Guys</p>
<p>I&#8217;m disappointed too.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t see how warehousing domains help anyone other than the registrars.</p>
<p>And I still say if NetSol did this for one day you would hear the outrage from all corners</p>
<p>On the other hand we cannot expect the ICA or any organization to represent our views 100% of the time.</p>
<p>We all disagree sometimes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yaron</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2008/07/06/icann-not-enforcing-rules-against-registrar-warehousing-because-there-are-no-rules/comment-page-1/#comment-6524</link>
		<dc:creator>Yaron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 16:08:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=741#comment-6524</guid>
		<description>Cartoonz,
I agree. For me this case was a great opportunity to see if I want to reconsider and join the ICA...
Very disappointing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cartoonz,<br />
I agree. For me this case was a great opportunity to see if I want to reconsider and join the ICA&#8230;<br />
Very disappointing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cartoonz</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2008/07/06/icann-not-enforcing-rules-against-registrar-warehousing-because-there-are-no-rules/comment-page-1/#comment-6521</link>
		<dc:creator>Cartoonz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 05:58:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=741#comment-6521</guid>
		<description>Yaron, 
I got that email too.  Frankly, I was deeply disappointed in the entire message.  Especially the part about him wanting us to shutup about this kind of thing on public forums such as this!

Of course, he is also involved with that same company that saw nothing wrong with 3 &quot;Do Overs&quot; on the .mobi auctions - talk about unethical.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yaron,<br />
I got that email too.  Frankly, I was deeply disappointed in the entire message.  Especially the part about him wanting us to shutup about this kind of thing on public forums such as this!</p>
<p>Of course, he is also involved with that same company that saw nothing wrong with 3 &#8220;Do Overs&#8221; on the .mobi auctions &#8211; talk about unethical.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Sequin</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2008/07/06/icann-not-enforcing-rules-against-registrar-warehousing-because-there-are-no-rules/comment-page-1/#comment-6520</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Sequin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 22:58:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=741#comment-6520</guid>
		<description>I think warehousing refers to domains that are expired and not released by the registrar&#039;s customers. 

I don&#039;t think it applies to individuals or companies that set up or buy a registrar for their own use. 

Still, the dreaded unpaid names department at Register.com and Moniker are a bit unethical to me. 

Can the previous registrant pay back renewal fees and get the domain back?

If the answer is no then the title of the &quot;unpaid names department&quot; seems to be fraudulently misleading.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think warehousing refers to domains that are expired and not released by the registrar&#8217;s customers. </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think it applies to individuals or companies that set up or buy a registrar for their own use. </p>
<p>Still, the dreaded unpaid names department at Register.com and Moniker are a bit unethical to me. </p>
<p>Can the previous registrant pay back renewal fees and get the domain back?</p>
<p>If the answer is no then the title of the &#8220;unpaid names department&#8221; seems to be fraudulently misleading.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yaron</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2008/07/06/icann-not-enforcing-rules-against-registrar-warehousing-because-there-are-no-rules/comment-page-1/#comment-6518</link>
		<dc:creator>Yaron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 19:41:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=741#comment-6518</guid>
		<description>Just got a letter for ICA president.
I guess ICA doesn&#039;t see any problem with the way Tucows, Inc. conduct business (including warehousing expiring domains).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just got a letter for ICA president.<br />
I guess ICA doesn&#8217;t see any problem with the way Tucows, Inc. conduct business (including warehousing expiring domains).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Castello</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2008/07/06/icann-not-enforcing-rules-against-registrar-warehousing-because-there-are-no-rules/comment-page-1/#comment-6516</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Castello</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 07:39:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=741#comment-6516</guid>
		<description>Very relevant post Michael. Since David and I have become members of the Business User Constituency I can tell you that a lot of work is done behind the scenes in email and phone correspondence relating to issues that relate to your concerns. You voice DOES matter and I encourage everyone to make yourself heard by contacting ICANN through email, phone and their contact form at:

http://www.icann.org/cgi/contact

It does take time to filter through but ICANN has a mandate to take these issues seriously and find the best outcome for everyone. The recent Domain tasting resolution is a good example of its progress.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very relevant post Michael. Since David and I have become members of the Business User Constituency I can tell you that a lot of work is done behind the scenes in email and phone correspondence relating to issues that relate to your concerns. You voice DOES matter and I encourage everyone to make yourself heard by contacting ICANN through email, phone and their contact form at:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.icann.org/cgi/contact" rel="nofollow">http://www.icann.org/cgi/contact</a></p>
<p>It does take time to filter through but ICANN has a mandate to take these issues seriously and find the best outcome for everyone. The recent Domain tasting resolution is a good example of its progress.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Damir</title>
		<link>http://www.thedomains.com/2008/07/06/icann-not-enforcing-rules-against-registrar-warehousing-because-there-are-no-rules/comment-page-1/#comment-6514</link>
		<dc:creator>Damir</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 18:28:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedomains.com/?p=741#comment-6514</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the honest post - you are right there 100%.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the honest post &#8211; you are right there 100%.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
